[PATCH] gnu: racket: Update to 8.14.

(racket)[inputs]<compatibility, db, drracket, gui, htdp, math>

<parser-tools, rackunit, redex, sribble, snip, typed-racket>

<string-constants, web-server>: Update hashes.

Change-Id: Id5a08e0e550cb8a2d5cd0920880ae19f9ac319c7

---

gnu/packages/racket.scm | 32 ++++++++++++++++----------------

1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

merge 72742 72582

quit

Hi Ashish,

On Tue, Aug 20, 2024, at 8:54 PM, ashish.is@lostca.se wrote:

Thanks for sending https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72742!

I had in fact sent essentially the same patch in https://issues.guix.gnu.org/72582; it's just waiting for someone to review and merge it. I'm CC'ing a few people who might be able to take a look.

In 72582 I also sent a commit reverting 0c96f7932de50c81f4b4714f287520699107c8bb, which merely masked an underlying problem on riscv64-linux, for reasons I explained in the cover letter there. If no one has time or hardware to look into the riscv situation, it's of course fine to just apply the commit with the update to 8.14 and address riscv in a separate issue (which arguably I should have done in the first place ...).

Thanks,

Philip McGrath

(The Guix "Racket team")

Hi Philip,

Am Dienstag, dem 20.08.2024 um 21:39 -0400 schrieb Philip McGrath:

Looking at CI, there appears to be no meaningful difference except that

previously unknown packages have since become blocked – for what

appears to be completely unrelated reasons, e.g. missing disk space[1].

So while the CI situation for riscv is "we don't know", at the very

least we could push the update that's already built.

Cheers

[1]