guix deploy should have --skip-checks

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • Michael Rohleder
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Michael Rohleder
Severity
important
M
M
Michael Rohleder wrote on 24 Dec 2021 05:05
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
877dbubqal.fsf@rohleder.de
If a customized kernel is build with "non standard" (initrd) modules, one
needs --skip-checks for guix system reconfigure.
This can't be deployed, because guix deploy has no --skip-checks.

I came up with this issue in #irc and Ludo said, we should have a bug,
so we don't forget ;)


Love, Peace & Guix!

--
Q. What is the best prefix for global variables?
A: //
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFFBAEBCAAvFiEEdV4t5dDVhcUueCgwfHr/vv7yyyUFAmHFRyIRHG1pa2VAcm9o
bGVkZXIuZGUACgkQfHr/vv7yyyWXmwgAu3DYPZwXMLSP+Io1fxFb5hsab0DZaOTR
TCsfla6Jb4Hcs3nSnamZc31QGWZUcjryUqM2H/b+xEeaUh3Bg5V3tI+HCYQ4VzUj
6VxdXidwfFwjcFGIwruqz7QOLf2mBcqASjb6GxUTeYsAueEIy5TKhidsDLgQQ3yW
JlsRDvog5zFxsumC4lKiU8Sj+MgNm9nrG+QkQbXgmBHhdBV2zRhOfXtqCF/wR6tm
hpIWn2WAtZnHoh/8gvtd7SiD5cEtsGXAA9h72AOt/hoHNUqPyWiGN+vjlXSyXMwj
+DIg8tBwCFH1M9Vipy1JafSSaf1xQ9o53K4M0JcZrNjijC1U5183gQ==
=Wxax
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 14 Jan 2022 09:17
control message for bug #52766
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87ee5a6899.fsf@gnu.org
severity 52766 important
quit
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 17 Jan 2022 00:00
Re: bug#52766: guix deploy should have --skip-checks
(name . Michael Rohleder)(address . mike@rohleder.de)(address . 52766-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87czkrz3o5.fsf@gnu.org
Hello!

Michael Rohleder <mike@rohleder.de> skribis:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> If a customized kernel is build with "non standard" (initrd) modules, one
> needs --skip-checks for guix system reconfigure.
> This can't be deployed, because guix deploy has no --skip-checks.

I addressed that in 084b76a70a6b302529f3450e6d07f1d105a10f7d, not by
adding ‘--skip-checks’, but instead by adding a ‘safety-checks?’ field
to <machine-ssh-configuration>. This is consistent with the
‘allow-upgrades?’ field that was added to skip downgrade checks.

Let me know what you think!

Thanks,
Ludo’.
Closed
M
M
Michael Rohleder wrote on 17 Jan 2022 01:22
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 52766@debbugs.gnu.org)
87ilujw6rh.fsf@rohleder.de
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
Toggle quote (7 lines)
> I addressed that in 084b76a70a6b302529f3450e6d07f1d105a10f7d, not by
> adding ‘--skip-checks’, but instead by adding a ‘safety-checks?’ field
> to <machine-ssh-configuration>. This is consistent with the
> ‘allow-upgrades?’ field that was added to skip downgrade checks.
>
> Let me know what you think!

I love it! Thank you very much!
(Will test it soon/asap...)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFFBAEBCAAvFiEEdV4t5dDVhcUueCgwfHr/vv7yyyUFAmHktsMRHG1pa2VAcm9o
bGVkZXIuZGUACgkQfHr/vv7yyyWuKAgAvghOgUAhq/osDKG4m8c2kaHE0huNXcsg
4VEdLF45YyVjcUWAkk19eDKXhinUc0qsIfaz21amVPSA5Ee6Lrw6+m0TtFQprl6z
Bt30p9YWGVoztw6RxMQ5Y+JHOYXKo3se+YqRTfMt7GCd3qGKQqlJr6vJzboAUNKh
g/1Wb0fiO4e7P+IdxwOj9seFCzSZ69D2C3+eBLLxzh7OPNJcRxQY/IaFSY8byoxg
nvqjxrLR1lBHHlCBPHnPnJhNI5xOz/0vaWtN6cKN1EC3kGYkp0OAB/4J+KtNUz7E
xmudH2wbP4WYNYnd+NIQ2K277X9nD0o4288YWVRQgV+v0MzBU6tnqw==
=TQ+1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 52766@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 52766
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch