guix deploy should have --skip-checks

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • Michael Rohleder
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Michael Rohleder
Severity
important
M
M
Michael Rohleder wrote on 24 Dec 2021 05:05
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
877dbubqal.fsf@rohleder.de
If a customized kernel is build with "non standard" (initrd) modules, one
needs --skip-checks for guix system reconfigure.
This can't be deployed, because guix deploy has no --skip-checks.

I came up with this issue in #irc and Ludo said, we should have a bug,
so we don't forget ;)


Love, Peace & Guix!

--
Q. What is the best prefix for global variables?
A: //
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFFBAEBCAAvFiEEdV4t5dDVhcUueCgwfHr/vv7yyyUFAmHFRyIRHG1pa2VAcm9o
bGVkZXIuZGUACgkQfHr/vv7yyyWXmwgAu3DYPZwXMLSP+Io1fxFb5hsab0DZaOTR
TCsfla6Jb4Hcs3nSnamZc31QGWZUcjryUqM2H/b+xEeaUh3Bg5V3tI+HCYQ4VzUj
6VxdXidwfFwjcFGIwruqz7QOLf2mBcqASjb6GxUTeYsAueEIy5TKhidsDLgQQ3yW
JlsRDvog5zFxsumC4lKiU8Sj+MgNm9nrG+QkQbXgmBHhdBV2zRhOfXtqCF/wR6tm
hpIWn2WAtZnHoh/8gvtd7SiD5cEtsGXAA9h72AOt/hoHNUqPyWiGN+vjlXSyXMwj
+DIg8tBwCFH1M9Vipy1JafSSaf1xQ9o53K4M0JcZrNjijC1U5183gQ==
=Wxax
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 14 Jan 2022 09:17
control message for bug #52766
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87ee5a6899.fsf@gnu.org
severity 52766 important
quit
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 17 Jan 2022 00:00
Re: bug#52766: guix deploy should have --skip-checks
(name . Michael Rohleder)(address . mike@rohleder.de)(address . 52766-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87czkrz3o5.fsf@gnu.org
Hello!

Michael Rohleder <mike@rohleder.de> skribis:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> If a customized kernel is build with "non standard" (initrd) modules, one
> needs --skip-checks for guix system reconfigure.
> This can't be deployed, because guix deploy has no --skip-checks.

I addressed that in 084b76a70a6b302529f3450e6d07f1d105a10f7d, not by
adding ‘--skip-checks’, but instead by adding a ‘safety-checks?’ field
to <machine-ssh-configuration>. This is consistent with the
‘allow-upgrades?’ field that was added to skip downgrade checks.

Let me know what you think!

Thanks,
Ludo’.
Closed
M
M
Michael Rohleder wrote on 17 Jan 2022 01:22
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 52766@debbugs.gnu.org)
87ilujw6rh.fsf@rohleder.de
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
Toggle quote (7 lines)
> I addressed that in 084b76a70a6b302529f3450e6d07f1d105a10f7d, not by
> adding ‘--skip-checks’, but instead by adding a ‘safety-checks?’ field
> to <machine-ssh-configuration>. This is consistent with the
> ‘allow-upgrades?’ field that was added to skip downgrade checks.
>
> Let me know what you think!

I love it! Thank you very much!
(Will test it soon/asap...)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQFFBAEBCAAvFiEEdV4t5dDVhcUueCgwfHr/vv7yyyUFAmHktsMRHG1pa2VAcm9o
bGVkZXIuZGUACgkQfHr/vv7yyyWuKAgAvghOgUAhq/osDKG4m8c2kaHE0huNXcsg
4VEdLF45YyVjcUWAkk19eDKXhinUc0qsIfaz21amVPSA5Ee6Lrw6+m0TtFQprl6z
Bt30p9YWGVoztw6RxMQ5Y+JHOYXKo3se+YqRTfMt7GCd3qGKQqlJr6vJzboAUNKh
g/1Wb0fiO4e7P+IdxwOj9seFCzSZ69D2C3+eBLLxzh7OPNJcRxQY/IaFSY8byoxg
nvqjxrLR1lBHHlCBPHnPnJhNI5xOz/0vaWtN6cKN1EC3kGYkp0OAB/4J+KtNUz7E
xmudH2wbP4WYNYnd+NIQ2K277X9nD0o4288YWVRQgV+v0MzBU6tnqw==
=TQ+1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

?