Ludovic Courtès writes: > I addressed that in 084b76a70a6b302529f3450e6d07f1d105a10f7d, not by > adding ‘--skip-checks’, but instead by adding a ‘safety-checks?’ field > to . This is consistent with the > ‘allow-upgrades?’ field that was added to skip downgrade checks. > > Let me know what you think! I love it! Thank you very much! (Will test it soon/asap...)