[PATCH] gnu: Add b2sum.

OpenSubmitted by Leo Famulari.
Details
4 participants
  • Nicolò Balzarotti
  • Leo Famulari
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • zimoun
Owner
unassigned
Severity
normal
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 14 Oct 06:28 +0200
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)
f0cc4fd9538ab9dd8c7649efbc457f26cf536b98.1634185715.git.leo@famulari.name
* gnu/packages/crypto.scm (b2sum): New variable.--- gnu/packages/crypto.scm | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Toggle diff (58 lines)diff --git a/gnu/packages/crypto.scm b/gnu/packages/crypto.scmindex 64cdf48d5d..9d16d64ed2 100644--- a/gnu/packages/crypto.scm+++ b/gnu/packages/crypto.scm@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ ;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU ;;; Copyright © 2014 David Thompson <davet@gnu.org> ;;; Copyright © 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>-;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>+;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2021 Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> ;;; Copyright © 2016 Lukas Gradl <lgradl@openmailbox> ;;; Copyright © 2016–2021 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017 Nikita <nikita@n0.is>@@ -838,6 +838,42 @@ (define-public libb2 BLAKE.") (license license:public-domain))) +(define-public b2sum+ ;; Upstream doesn't seem to use a versioned release workflow, so build from+ ;; a recent commit.+ (let ((commit "54f4faa4c16ea34bcd59d16e8da46a64b259fc07")+ (revision "0"))+ (package+ (name "b2sum")+ (version (git-version "20190724" revision commit))+ (source (origin+ (method git-fetch)+ (uri (git-reference+ (url "https://github.com/BLAKE2/BLAKE2")+ (commit commit)))+ (file-name (git-file-name name version))+ (sha256+ (base32 "04z631v0vzl52g73v390ask5fnzi5wg83lcjkjhpmmymaz0jn152"))))+ (build-system gnu-build-system)+ (arguments+ `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target))+ (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out")))+ #:tests? #f ; No test suite+ #:phases+ (modify-phases %standard-phases+ ;; XXX Can add-before and delete be expected to work like this?+ (add-before 'configure 'change-directory+ (lambda _+ (chdir "b2sum")))+ (delete 'configure))))+ (home-page "https://www.blake2.net/")+ (synopsis "BLAKE2 checksum tool")+ (description "BLAKE2 is a cryptographic hash function faster than MD5,+SHA-1, SHA-2, and SHA-3, yet is at least as secure as SHA-3.")+ ;; You may also choose to redistribute this program as Apache 2.0 or the+ ;; OpenSSL license. See 'b2sum/b2sum.c' in the source distribution.+ (license license:cc0))))+ (define-public rhash (package (name "rhash")-- 2.33.0
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 26 Oct 18:07 +0200
(address . 51198-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
YXgn3cHpZnNG/7TW@jasmine.lan
Pushed as 3d51fd19faee59d9455eebbb957cf6498ecc1220
Closed
N
N
Nicolò Balzarotti wrote on 27 Oct 00:26 +0200
Re: [bug#51198] [PATCH] gnu: Add b2sum.
878ryfjudi.fsf@guix.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
Toggle quote (2 lines)> * gnu/packages/crypto.scm (b2sum): New variable.
Hi, I guix pulled and wanted to try this, but I get
Toggle quote (3 lines)>> b2sum --help> Illegal instruction
(I'm on an old X200 thinkpad). Might it be that build is notdeterministic (and we should disable some optimization)?
Thanks, Nicolò
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 27 Oct 00:53 +0200
(name . Nicolò Balzarotti)(address . anothersms@gmail.com)(address . 51198@debbugs.gnu.org)
YXiHA4gg/S+WbaA2@jasmine.lan
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:26:01AM +0200, Nicol� Balzarotti wrote:
Toggle quote (12 lines)> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:> > > * gnu/packages/crypto.scm (b2sum): New variable.> > Hi, I guix pulled and wanted to try this, but I get> > >> b2sum --help> > Illegal instruction> > (I'm on an old X200 thinkpad). Might it be that build is not> deterministic (and we should disable some optimization)?
I guess it's because the package built with "-march=native".
What's the right choice for this parameter?
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/x86-Options.html
CC-ing Mark Weaver because he often has good advice on this subject.
'gnu/packages' does include some "-march=" examples.
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 27 Oct 00:54 +0200
(name . Nicolò Balzarotti)(address . anothersms@gmail.com)
YXiHLANegtLJmb9r@jasmine.lan
On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 06:53:55PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
Toggle quote (10 lines)> I guess it's because the package built with "-march=native".> > What's the right choice for this parameter?> > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/x86-Options.html> > CC-ing Mark Weaver because he often has good advice on this subject.> > 'gnu/packages' does include some "-march=" examples.
Er, CC-ing for real now
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 27 Oct 01:16 +0200
(name . Nicolò Balzarotti)(address . anothersms@gmail.com)(address . 51198@debbugs.gnu.org)
YXiMRvAiHuTfIDU5@jasmine.lan
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:26:01AM +0200, Nicol� Balzarotti wrote:
Toggle quote (3 lines)> (I'm on an old X200 thinkpad). Might it be that build is not> deterministic (and we should disable some optimization)?
As a test, I replaced march=native with march=x86-64.
My benchmark is hashing a ~7GB tree of files [0].
Once the files are cached by the kernel:"march=native": ~13 seconds"march=x86-64": ~20 seconds
I wonder if some of the other values of -march are faster...
Or maybe the package could use #:substitutable #f, since b2sum is a veryquick build.
Although BLAKE3 / b3sum [1] is radically faster, b2sum is nice becauseit's not in Rust, which is still suboptimal on Guix. With b3sum, mybenchmark takes less than 2 seconds!
[0]`LC_ALL=C; find "$1" -type f -print0 | sort -z | xargs -0 b2sum | time b2sum`
[1] https://bugs.gnu.org/51289
N
N
Nicolò Balzarotti wrote on 27 Oct 10:44 +0200
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)(address . 51198@debbugs.gnu.org)
874k92kgaq.fsf@guix.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me
Hi Leo,
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
Toggle quote (11 lines)> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 12:26:01AM +0200, Nicolò Balzarotti wrote:>> (I'm on an old X200 thinkpad). Might it be that build is not>> deterministic (and we should disable some optimization)?>> As a test, I replaced march=native with march=x86-64.>> [...]>> Or maybe the package could use #:substitutable #f, since b2sum is a very> quick build.
This blog post [fn:1] on guix-hpc address the "Pre-built binariesvs. performance" dilemma.
I guess the easiest way is to provide a variant (b2sum-avx or somethinglike that) with avx enabled. Else, I'd just go with the unoptimizedversion as it happens for many other packages, but let's hear fromothers.
Thanks, Nicolò
[fn:1] https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2018/01/pre-built-binaries-vs-performance/
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 27 Oct 17:38 +0200
(name . Nicolò Balzarotti)(address . anothersms@gmail.com)(address . 51198@debbugs.gnu.org)
YXlyYGZAOg7GhC5m@jasmine.lan
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:44:45AM +0200, Nicol� Balzarotti wrote:
Toggle quote (5 lines)> This blog post [fn:1] on guix-hpc address the "Pre-built binaries> vs. performance" dilemma.>> [fn:1] https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2018/01/pre-built-binaries-vs-performance/
It's helpful, but it doesn't look like we are using that method in Guixanymore. It was removed in this commit:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=969adb235ee34decb65255e1ea821ff0e221ed3d
I guess it learned how to do runtime feature detection?
Toggle quote (5 lines)> I guess the easiest way is to provide a variant (b2sum-avx or something> like that) with avx enabled. Else, I'd just go with the unoptimized> version as it happens for many other packages, but let's hear from> others.
The easiest thing is require local building, since it's an extremelycheap build. Only 1.5 seconds on my laptop, total (not just the buildphase). With blis, one had to consider the lengthy build time.
Because performance is critical for a tool like this, and because it'scheap to build, I've attached a patch to require local building. This iseasier for me than creating a set of package variants that will need tobe expanded for each new generation of CPUs :)
From 8b862425310cf631c30c823eb0fa2bfd79d36823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:29:40 -0400Subject: [PATCH] gnu: b2sum: Build on the local machine.
* gnu/packages/crypto.scm (b2sum)[arguments]: Set '#:substitutable? #f'.--- gnu/packages/crypto.scm | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Toggle diff (27 lines)diff --git a/gnu/packages/crypto.scm b/gnu/packages/crypto.scmindex 3acd147f25..de8bcf1d70 100644--- a/gnu/packages/crypto.scm+++ b/gnu/packages/crypto.scm@@ -858,9 +858,18 @@ (define-public b2sum (base32 "04z631v0vzl52g73v390ask5fnzi5wg83lcjkjhpmmymaz0jn152")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments- `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target))- (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out")))+ `(;; By default, b2sum uses the compiler to generate instructions+ ;; tailored to the CPU of the running machine, using "-march=native".+ ;; This gives a ~1.5x speedup on a Core i5-6300U with a large dataset+ ;; paged in, whereas compilation of b2sum takes ~1.5 seconds.+ ;; b2sum does not support run-time feature detection:+ ;; https://github.com/BLAKE2/BLAKE2/issues/1+ ;; For more information, see the discussion beginning here:+ ;; https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51198#13+ #:substitutable? #f #:tests? #f ; No test suite+ #:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target))+ (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out"))) #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases (add-before 'build 'change-directory-- 2.33.1
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 27 Oct 17:56 +0200
Re: bug#51198: [PATCH] gnu: Add b2sum.
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)
875ytifols.fsf_-_@gnu.org
Hi!
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
Toggle quote (13 lines)> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:44:45AM +0200, Nicolò Balzarotti wrote:>> This blog post [fn:1] on guix-hpc address the "Pre-built binaries>> vs. performance" dilemma.>>>> [fn:1] https://hpc.guix.info/blog/2018/01/pre-built-binaries-vs-performance/>> It's helpful, but it doesn't look like we are using that method in Guix> anymore. It was removed in this commit:>> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?id=969adb235ee34decb65255e1ea821ff0e221ed3d>> I guess it learned how to do runtime feature detection?
BLIS has run-time/load-time feature detection now (which is the mainapproach the blog argues for).
Toggle quote (44 lines)>> I guess the easiest way is to provide a variant (b2sum-avx or something>> like that) with avx enabled. Else, I'd just go with the unoptimized>> version as it happens for many other packages, but let's hear from>> others.>> The easiest thing is require local building, since it's an extremely> cheap build. Only 1.5 seconds on my laptop, total (not just the build> phase). With blis, one had to consider the lengthy build time.>> Because performance is critical for a tool like this, and because it's> cheap to build, I've attached a patch to require local building. This is> easier for me than creating a set of package variants that will need to> be expanded for each new generation of CPUs :)>>>From 8b862425310cf631c30c823eb0fa2bfd79d36823 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001> From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>> Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:29:40 -0400> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: b2sum: Build on the local machine.>> * gnu/packages/crypto.scm (b2sum)[arguments]: Set '#:substitutable? #f'.> ---> gnu/packages/crypto.scm | 13 +++++++++++--> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/crypto.scm b/gnu/packages/crypto.scm> index 3acd147f25..de8bcf1d70 100644> --- a/gnu/packages/crypto.scm> +++ b/gnu/packages/crypto.scm> @@ -858,9 +858,18 @@ (define-public b2sum> (base32 "04z631v0vzl52g73v390ask5fnzi5wg83lcjkjhpmmymaz0jn152"))))> (build-system gnu-build-system)> (arguments> - `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target))> - (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out")))> + `(;; By default, b2sum uses the compiler to generate instructions> + ;; tailored to the CPU of the running machine, using "-march=native".> + ;; This gives a ~1.5x speedup on a Core i5-6300U with a large dataset> + ;; paged in, whereas compilation of b2sum takes ~1.5 seconds.> + ;; b2sum does not support run-time feature detection:> + ;; https://github.com/BLAKE2/BLAKE2/issues/1> + ;; For more information, see the discussion beginning here:> + ;; https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51198#13> + #:substitutable? #f
It’s okay but not entirely sufficient: on a cluster setup, you typicallytalk to a daemon that’s on another machine, so the CPU features it’lldetect there may be different from those you’ll use. Likewise, asdiscussed on IRC, you’d also need #:local-build? #t.
Anyway, I’d suggest using ‘guix hash -H blake2s-256’ or similar (it useslibgcrypt, which does the right thing). I think the latest Coreutilsprovide a generic ‘cksum’, too, that probably does the right thing.
Ludo’.
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 3 Nov 18:32 +0100
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
YYLHs6Wx6EuaQuBR@jasmine.lan
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:56:31PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Toggle quote (5 lines)> It’s okay but not entirely sufficient: on a cluster setup, you typically> talk to a daemon that’s on another machine, so the CPU features it’ll> detect there may be different from those you’ll use. Likewise, as> discussed on IRC, you’d also need #:local-build? #t.
It seems that #:local-build? is not available in gnu-build-system. Isthat correct?
Using the attached patch, building fails with "Unrecognized keyword:#:local-build?".
Is there a way to turn it on for packages using gnu-build-system?
From 77a063e797849332b784decab32f29be3d13f031 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:29:40 -0400Subject: [PATCH] gnu: b2sum: Build on the local machine.
* gnu/packages/crypto.scm (b2sum)[arguments]: Set '#:substitutable? #f' and'#:local-build? #t'.--- gnu/packages/crypto.scm | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Toggle diff (28 lines)diff --git a/gnu/packages/crypto.scm b/gnu/packages/crypto.scmindex f48fc23c1f..7ef8504eb7 100644--- a/gnu/packages/crypto.scm+++ b/gnu/packages/crypto.scm@@ -858,9 +858,19 @@ (define-public b2sum (base32 "04z631v0vzl52g73v390ask5fnzi5wg83lcjkjhpmmymaz0jn152")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments- `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target))- (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out")))+ `(;; By default, b2sum uses the compiler to generate instructions+ ;; tailored to the CPU of the running machine, using "-march=native".+ ;; This gives a ~1.5x speedup on a Core i5-6300U with a large dataset+ ;; paged in, whereas compilation of b2sum takes ~1.5 seconds.+ ;; b2sum does not support run-time feature detection:+ ;; https://github.com/BLAKE2/BLAKE2/issues/1+ ;; For more information, see the discussion beginning here:+ ;; https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51198#13+ #:substitutable? #f+ #:local-build? #t #:tests? #f ; No test suite+ #:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target))+ (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out"))) #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases (add-before 'build 'change-directory-- 2.33.1
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 6 Nov 17:45 +0100
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)
87o86xmdwy.fsf@gnu.org
Hi,
Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
Toggle quote (9 lines)> On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 05:56:31PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:>> It’s okay but not entirely sufficient: on a cluster setup, you typically>> talk to a daemon that’s on another machine, so the CPU features it’ll>> detect there may be different from those you’ll use. Likewise, as>> discussed on IRC, you’d also need #:local-build? #t.>> It seems that #:local-build? is not available in gnu-build-system. Is> that correct?
Oh right, it’s missing from (guix build-system gnu). We could easilyadd it.
Though again, it would remain an approximation of what we really want.
HTH!
Ludo’.
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 28 Nov 00:32 +0100
[PATCH v2 1/2] build-system/gnu: Add #:local-build? parameter.
(address . 51198@debbugs.gnu.org)
f431dfb3f08a24a6d35bd378bccbf3043beae3db.1638055958.git.leo@famulari.name
* guix/build-system/gnu.scm (gnu-build, gnu-cross-build): Add #:local-build?parameter and pass it to 'build-expression->derivation'.--- guix/build-system/gnu.scm | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Toggle diff (38 lines)diff --git a/guix/build-system/gnu.scm b/guix/build-system/gnu.scmindex 6b481ad45c..fc923f0c5a 100644--- a/guix/build-system/gnu.scm+++ b/guix/build-system/gnu.scm@@ -349,6 +349,7 @@ (define* (gnu-build store name input-drvs (build (nix-system->gnu-triplet system)) (imported-modules %gnu-build-system-modules) (modules %default-modules)+ (local-build? #f) (substitutable? #t) allowed-references disallowed-references)@@ -429,6 +430,7 @@ (define guile-for-build #:inputs input-drvs #:outputs outputs #:modules imported-modules+ #:local-build? local-build? #:substitutable? substitutable? #:allowed-references@@ -504,6 +506,7 @@ (define* (gnu-cross-build store name (build (nix-system->gnu-triplet system)) (imported-modules %gnu-build-system-modules) (modules %default-modules)+ (local-build? #f) (substitutable? #t) allowed-references disallowed-references)@@ -595,6 +598,7 @@ (define guile-for-build #:inputs (append native-drvs target-drvs) #:outputs outputs #:modules imported-modules+ #:local-build? local-build? #:substitutable? substitutable? #:allowed-references-- 2.33.1
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 28 Nov 00:32 +0100
[PATCH v2 2/2] gnu: b2sum: Build on the local machine.
(address . 51198@debbugs.gnu.org)
0a0f14aab09280676f078f3df5eeef44b019760d.1638055958.git.leo@famulari.name
* gnu/packages/crypto.scm (b2sum)[arguments]: Set '#:substitutable? #f' and'#:local-build? #t'.--- gnu/packages/crypto.scm | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Toggle diff (28 lines)diff --git a/gnu/packages/crypto.scm b/gnu/packages/crypto.scmindex b6f2010a80..d4c6717eb5 100644--- a/gnu/packages/crypto.scm+++ b/gnu/packages/crypto.scm@@ -858,9 +858,19 @@ (define-public b2sum (base32 "04z631v0vzl52g73v390ask5fnzi5wg83lcjkjhpmmymaz0jn152")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments- `(#:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target))- (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out")))+ `(;; By default, b2sum uses the compiler to generate instructions+ ;; tailored to the CPU of the running machine, using "-march=native".+ ;; This gives a ~1.5x speedup on a Core i5-6300U with a large dataset+ ;; paged in, whereas compilation of b2sum takes ~1.5 seconds.+ ;; b2sum does not support run-time feature detection:+ ;; https://github.com/BLAKE2/BLAKE2/issues/1+ ;; For more information, see the discussion beginning here:+ ;; https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=51198#13+ #:substitutable? #f+ #:local-build? #t #:tests? #f ; No test suite+ #:make-flags (list (string-append "CC=" ,(cc-for-target))+ (string-append "PREFIX=" (assoc-ref %outputs "out"))) #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases (add-before 'build 'change-directory-- 2.33.1
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 28 Nov 00:36 +0100
Re: bug#51198: [PATCH] gnu: Add b2sum.
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
YaLBEFYe1cvBNQpz@jasmine.lan
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 05:45:01PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Toggle quote (7 lines)> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:> > It seems that #:local-build? is not available in gnu-build-system. Is> > that correct?> > Oh right, it’s missing from (guix build-system gnu). We could easily> add it.
I've sent patches to make this change. I checked that the derivation of'hello' is unchanged when building without cross-compilation.
https://issues.guix.gnu.org/51198#12
Z
Z
zimoun wrote 5 days ago
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)(address . 51198@debbugs.gnu.org)
87k0goqqz2.fsf_-_@gmail.com
Hi Leo,
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 at 18:32, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
Toggle quote (3 lines)> * guix/build-system/gnu.scm (gnu-build, gnu-cross-build): Add #:local-build?> parameter and pass it to 'build-expression->derivation'.
The manual needs to be updated, I guess. Something there:
https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#index-gnu_002dbuild_002dsystem

This gnu-build-system triggers a world rebuild, isn’t it? Maybe, itcould go to core-updates-frozen now, no? (Now = before merge :-))
Cheers,simon
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote 5 days ago
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)(address . 51198@debbugs.gnu.org)
Yae137sHQfI2rdk9@jasmine.lan
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:34:09PM +0100, zimoun wrote:
Toggle quote (8 lines)> On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 at 18:32, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:> > * guix/build-system/gnu.scm (gnu-build, gnu-cross-build): Add #:local-build?> > parameter and pass it to 'build-expression->derivation'.> > The manual needs to be updated, I guess. Something there:> > <https://guix.gnu.org/manual/devel/en/guix.html#index-gnu_002dbuild_002dsystem>
Good idea, I'll send a revised patch series.
Toggle quote (3 lines)> This gnu-build-system triggers a world rebuild, isn’t it? Maybe, it> could go to core-updates-frozen now, no? (Now = before merge :-))
As far as I can tell, this does not change any derivations, except ofcourse if a package definition uses the new #:local-build? option. So itshould be okay for the master branch, if it's a change that we want tomake.
?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send email to 51198@debbugs.gnu.org