[PATCH] Optimise search-patch (reducing I/O)

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • Maxime Devos
  • zimoun
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Maxime Devos
Severity
normal
M
M
Maxime Devos wrote on 4 Sep 2021 23:17
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)
8900fa8c8eef7f72fc97adc2408be26c88de7803.camel@telenet.be
Hi guix!

The attached patch series optimises the G-exp compiler for
local-file, by avoiding interning the file if it's already
in the store, but only if the hash is known in advance.
To take advantage of this, 'search-patch' has been modified
to compute the hash at expansion time.

The cost of this optimisation is a little additional
complexity, and computing derivations theoretically becomes
a little more expensive when the patch isn't already in
the store (1 call to 'stat' per non-yet-interned patch).

If you want to test this patch series for performance,
do _not_ run ./pre-inst-env guix, instead use
"guix pull --url=$PWD --branch=...", because the guix
from the checkout performs more 'lstat' calls than
an ‘user’ guix from "guix pull".

I'll show the patch series decreases the number of syscalls
below, using the 'strace' command. Use 'strace -c' to gather
some statistics:

# Run it twice for a hot cache. Ignore the output of the first run.
$ strace -c ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix build -d pigx --no-grafts
$ strace -c ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix build -d pigx --no-grafts
#
$ strace -c guix build -d pigx --no-grafts
$ strace -c guix build -d pigx --no-grafts

I've selected some syscalls from the output that seemed relevant
and formatted the call count in a table

optimised unoptimised result of optimisation:
stat 3865 3712 + 4.1%
lstat 119 321 -62.9%
fstat 59 59 unchanged
read 17303 17688 - 2.2%
write 6741 6767 - 1.9%
openat 885 1076 -17.8%
readlink 14 16 -12.5%
-------
total 28886 32539 -11.2%

Almost all syscalls are now called less (-11.2% in total),
which is good. The exception is 'stat'.

Because 'search-path' is now being called less often
(only when the patch isn't in the store), the number
of 'stat' calls decreases. However, 'local-file-compiler'
now calls 'stat' more (one or two times per patch). I think
it's worth it though, because:

(1) the second 'stat' is on the same file as the first 'stat',
so presumably the kernel has cached the result, so no need
to wait for I/O to complete the second time (there's a context
switch though). So ignoring the context switch cost,
there are only ‘effectively’ +2.1% extra calls to 'stat'.

(2) the total decrease of -11.2% syscalls

Now, what about the actual "time to derivation"?
First, let's time "guix build -d pigx --no-grafts" to get some raw numbers
on guix before the optimisation:

time guix build -d pigx --no-grafts
# repeated four times, first output is discarded
# to eliminate hot/cold cache differences
/gnu/store/03vmq94ckxfx6c4rc9zh745yy63n5i5m-pigx-0.0.3.drv
real 0m13,470s
user 0m13,526s
sys 0m0,573s
/gnu/store/03vmq94ckxfx6c4rc9zh745yy63n5i5m-pigx-0.0.3.drv
real 0m13,582s
user 0m13,639s
sys 0m0,568s
/gnu/store/03vmq94ckxfx6c4rc9zh745yy63n5i5m-pigx-0.0.3.drv
real 0m13,834s
user 0m13,901s
sys 0m0,556s

Average numbers:
real 0m13,629s
user 0m13,689s
sys 0m0,566s

After the optimisation:
time ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix build -d pigx --no-grafts
/gnu/store/fq6x8d2vcm6sbjkimg7g8kcgb4c5xv1b-pigx-0.0.3.drv
real 0m14,150s
user 0m13,979s
sys 0m0,685s
/gnu/store/fq6x8d2vcm6sbjkimg7g8kcgb4c5xv1b-pigx-0.0.3.drv
real 0m13,781s
user 0m13,697s
sys 0m0,580s
/gnu/store/fq6x8d2vcm6sbjkimg7g8kcgb4c5xv1b-pigx-0.0.3.drv
real 0m14,247s
user 0m14,160s
sys 0m0,548s

The numbers are higher somehow after the optimisations?
Even the 'sys' time is higher, even though there are less syscalls?
I re-ran the time commands, and got a decrease in 'real' time this time.

/gnu/store/fq6x8d2vcm6sbjkimg7g8kcgb4c5xv1b-pigx-0.0.3.drv
real 0m13,304s
user 0m13,146s
sys 0m0,609s
/gnu/store/fq6x8d2vcm6sbjkimg7g8kcgb4c5xv1b-pigx-0.0.3.drv
real 0m12,132s
user 0m11,940s
sys 0m0,589s
/gnu/store/fq6x8d2vcm6sbjkimg7g8kcgb4c5xv1b-pigx-0.0.3.drv
real 0m13,716s
user 0m13,723s
sys 0m0,529s

The output of "time ..." seems inconclusive
(can possibly be attributed to things like CPU frequency changing?),
but the decrease in syscall counts seems quite nice to me.

Feel free to run your own tests!

Greetings,
Maxime.
From a8e24a5258aa05689bcafa70af071da5296f63a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 20:09:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] build-self: Implement basic 'hash-algorithm'.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The module (guix hash) used from 'search-patch' in a future
patch needs it to be properly defined when (guix hash) is being
compiled. 'search-patch' is used when the derivation of Guix is
being computed, so it is important to avoid the ‘wrong type to
apply: #<syntax-transformer hash-algorithm>’ error.

* build-aux/build-self.scm
(build-program)[fake-gcrypt-hash]: Define hash-algorithm for sha1
and sha256.
---
build-aux/build-self.scm | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (34 lines)
diff --git a/build-aux/build-self.scm b/build-aux/build-self.scm
index 3a2d13cc09..2c13d9d530 100644
--- a/build-aux/build-self.scm
+++ b/build-aux/build-self.scm
@@ -259,8 +259,17 @@ interface (FFI) of Guile.")
(define fake-gcrypt-hash
;; Fake (gcrypt hash) module; see below.
(scheme-file "hash.scm"
- #~(define-module (gcrypt hash)
- #:export (sha1 sha256))))
+ #~(begin
+ (define-module (gcrypt hash)
+ #:export (sha1 sha256 hash-algorithm))
+ ;; Avoid ‘Wrong type to apply:
+ ;; #<syntax-transformer hash-algorithm>’ errors.
+ (define sha1)
+ (define sha256)
+ (define-syntax hash-algorithm
+ (syntax-rules (sha1 sha256)
+ ((_ sha1) 2)
+ ((_ sha256) 8))))))
(define fake-git
(scheme-file "git.scm" #~(define-module (git))))

base-commit: b4d132f98e03fae559db832e88897f1e166c4d47
prerequisite-patch-id: 91a26ba19372112a11a0eea2b066d2f63641deb1
prerequisite-patch-id: a535c1ae2a1fbf75d7ac9a3118ed23bd4fa03ecc
prerequisite-patch-id: 29eba0cede1c1e7153a7c7b9a58b33b67f693a13
prerequisite-patch-id: 8dd2234fa0f867081c6cf614c7a22b00022702b4
prerequisite-patch-id: 2fe0e5c67a37ef3f0e22813c9808eaeec83bb552
prerequisite-patch-id: 91514568f1ef4870ad7ed7b3f685f04703f9c090
--
2.33.0
From cc54e1c5021119bfaba07849e83ea31f7099970e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 15:35:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] gexp: Allow computing the hash of the local file in
advance.

The new field is currently unused. The following patches will
populate and use the field to reduce the time-to-derivation
when the file is already interned in the store.

* guix/gexp.scm
(<local-file>): Add sha256 field.
(%local-file): Add sha256 argument for populating the field.
(local-file-compiler): Adjust 'match' expression.
---
guix/gexp.scm | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (51 lines)
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm
index f3d278b3e6..a633984688 100644
--- a/guix/gexp.scm
+++ b/guix/gexp.scm
@@ -419,13 +419,16 @@ Here TARGET is bound to the cross-compilation triplet or #f."
;; A local file name. FILE is the file name the user entered, which can be a
;; relative file name, and ABSOLUTE is a promise that computes its canonical
;; absolute file name. We keep it in a promise to compute it lazily and avoid
-;; repeated 'stat' calls.
+;; repeated 'stat' calls. Allow computing the hash of the file in advance,
+;; to avoid having to send the file to the daemon when it is already interned
+;; in the store.
(define-record-type <local-file>
- (%%local-file file absolute name recursive? select?)
+ (%%local-file file absolute name sha256 recursive? select?)
local-file?
(file local-file-file) ;string
(absolute %local-file-absolute-file-name) ;promise string
(name local-file-name) ;string
+ (sha256 local-file-sha256) ;sha256 bytevector | #f
(recursive? local-file-recursive?) ;Boolean
(select? local-file-select?)) ;string stat -> Boolean
@@ -434,6 +437,7 @@ Here TARGET is bound to the cross-compilation triplet or #f."
(define* (%local-file file promise #:optional (name (basename file))
#:key
(literal? #t) location
+ sha256
recursive? (select? true))
;; This intermediate procedure is part of our ABI, but the underlying
;; %%LOCAL-FILE is not.
@@ -441,7 +445,7 @@ Here TARGET is bound to the cross-compilation triplet or #f."
(warning (and=> location source-properties->location)
(G_ "resolving '~a' relative to current directory~%")
file))
- (%%local-file file promise name recursive? select?))
+ (%%local-file file promise name sha256 recursive? select?))
(define (absolute-file-name file directory)
"Return the canonical absolute file name for FILE, which lives in the
@@ -517,7 +521,7 @@ appears."
(define-gexp-compiler (local-file-compiler (file <local-file>) system target)
;; "Compile" FILE by adding it to the store.
(match file
- (($ <local-file> file (= force absolute) name recursive? select?)
+ (($ <local-file> file (= force absolute) name sha256 recursive? select?)
;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved. Failing
;; to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating a dangling
;; symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f 'add-to-store' would
--
2.33.0
From 1937edd906b817dd15648fa682d55d3b3f779e45 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 16:25:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] gexp: Allow overriding the absolute file name.

This will be used by the next patch to implement search-patch in
terms of local-file.

* guix/gexp.scm
(precanonicalized-file-name): New macro.
(local-file): Use the absolute file name from precanonicalized-file-name
when available.
---
guix/gexp.scm | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Toggle diff (46 lines)
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm
index a633984688..c69e4aa299 100644
--- a/guix/gexp.scm
+++ b/guix/gexp.scm
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
gexp-input-output
gexp-input-native?
+ precanonicalized-file-name
assume-valid-file-name
local-file
local-file?
@@ -463,6 +464,12 @@ the given file name is valid, even if it's not a string literal, and thus not
warn about it."
file)
+(define-syntax-rule (precanonicalized-file-name file absolute)
+ "This is a syntactic keyword to tell 'local-file' that it can assume that
+the given file name FILE has ABSOLUTE as absolute file name and 'local-file'
+does not need to compute the absolute file name by itself."
+ absolute)
+
(define-syntax local-file
(lambda (s)
"Return an object representing local file FILE to add to the store; this
@@ -481,7 +488,7 @@ where FILE is the entry's absolute file name and STAT is the result of
This is the declarative counterpart of the 'interned-file' monadic procedure.
It is implemented as a macro to capture the current source directory where it
appears."
- (syntax-case s (assume-valid-file-name)
+ (syntax-case s (assume-valid-file-name precanonicalized-file-name)
((_ file rest ...)
(string? (syntax->datum #'file))
;; FILE is a literal, so resolve it relative to the source directory.
@@ -495,6 +502,9 @@ appears."
#'(%local-file file
(delay (absolute-file-name file (getcwd)))
rest ...))
+ ((_ (precanonicalized-file-name file absolute) rest ...)
+ ;; Use the given file name ABSOLUTE as absolute file name.
+ #'(%local-file file (delay absolute) rest ...))
((_ file rest ...)
;; Resolve FILE relative to the current directory.
(with-syntax ((location (datum->syntax s (syntax-source s))))
--
2.33.0
Attachment: file
From 0fc54bdd9ccc9729fff54f5935a552e5e608a1d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:10:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] gexp: Do not intern if the file is already in the store.

* guix/gexp.scm (local-file-compiler): When the file is already in the
store, re-use the fixed output path instead of interning the file
again.
---
guix/gexp.scm | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (51 lines)
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm
index c69e4aa299..da1e918801 100644
--- a/guix/gexp.scm
+++ b/guix/gexp.scm
@@ -531,13 +531,37 @@ appears."
(define-gexp-compiler (local-file-compiler (file <local-file>) system target)
;; "Compile" FILE by adding it to the store.
(match file
- (($ <local-file> file (= force absolute) name sha256 recursive? select?)
- ;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved. Failing
- ;; to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating a dangling
- ;; symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f 'add-to-store' would
- ;; just throw an error, both of which are inconvenient.
- (interned-file absolute name
- #:recursive? recursive? #:select? select?))))
+ ;; Delay computing the absolute file name until 'intern', as this
+ ;; might be a relatively expensive computation (e.g. if search-patch
+ ;; is used), especially on a spinning disk.
+ (($ <local-file> file absolute-promise name sha256 recursive? select?)
+ (let ()
+ (define (intern)
+ ;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved.
+ ;; Failing to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating
+ ;; a dangling symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f
+ ;; 'add-to-store' would just throw an error, both of which are
+ ;; inconvenient.
+ (interned-file (force absolute-promise) name
+ #:recursive? recursive? #:select? select?))
+ (if sha256
+ (let ((path (fixed-output-path name sha256 #:recursive? recursive?)))
+ ;; If the hash is known in advance and the store already has the
+ ;; item, there is no need to intern the file.
+ (if (file-exists? path)
+ (mbegin %store-monad
+ ;; Tell the GC that PATH will be used, such that it won't
+ ;; be deleted.
+ ((store-lift add-temp-root) path)
+ ;; The GC could have deleted the item before add-temp-root
+ ;; completed, so check again if PATH exists.
+ (if (file-exists? path)
+ (return path)
+ ;; If it has been removed, fall-back interning.
+ (intern)))
+ ;; If PATH does not yet exist, fall back to interning.
+ (intern)))
+ (intern))))))
(define-record-type <plain-file>
(%plain-file name content references)
--
2.33.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYTPiVhccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7mUPAP9Tp6RrxYBG01bX5pGGZjhkUVxB
VlrLlALonb/bUSqfwgEA2ICKcwCwWq6gd7PZCTO2sGhtcgFlksT1MzyoNH+KHw0=
=D7ID
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 4 Sep 2021 23:47
(name . Maxime Devos)(address . maximedevos@telenet.be)(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
877dfwypvo.fsf@gnu.org
Hi!

Some initial comments…

Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:

Toggle quote (44 lines)
> +++ b/guix/gexp.scm
> @@ -531,13 +531,37 @@ appears."
> (define-gexp-compiler (local-file-compiler (file <local-file>) system target)
> ;; "Compile" FILE by adding it to the store.
> (match file
> - (($ <local-file> file (= force absolute) name sha256 recursive? select?)
> - ;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved. Failing
> - ;; to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating a dangling
> - ;; symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f 'add-to-store' would
> - ;; just throw an error, both of which are inconvenient.
> - (interned-file absolute name
> - #:recursive? recursive? #:select? select?))))
> + ;; Delay computing the absolute file name until 'intern', as this
> + ;; might be a relatively expensive computation (e.g. if search-patch
> + ;; is used), especially on a spinning disk.
> + (($ <local-file> file absolute-promise name sha256 recursive? select?)
> + (let ()
> + (define (intern)
> + ;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved.
> + ;; Failing to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating
> + ;; a dangling symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f
> + ;; 'add-to-store' would just throw an error, both of which are
> + ;; inconvenient.
> + (interned-file (force absolute-promise) name
> + #:recursive? recursive? #:select? select?))
> + (if sha256
> + (let ((path (fixed-output-path name sha256 #:recursive? recursive?)))
> + ;; If the hash is known in advance and the store already has the
> + ;; item, there is no need to intern the file.
> + (if (file-exists? path)
> + (mbegin %store-monad
> + ;; Tell the GC that PATH will be used, such that it won't
> + ;; be deleted.
> + ((store-lift add-temp-root) path)
> + ;; The GC could have deleted the item before add-temp-root
> + ;; completed, so check again if PATH exists.
> + (if (file-exists? path)
> + (return path)
> + ;; If it has been removed, fall-back interning.
> + (intern)))
> + ;; If PATH does not yet exist, fall back to interning.
> + (intern)))
> + (intern))))))

‘file-exists?’ won’t work when talking to a remote store (e.g.,
GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET=ssh://…).

‘add-temp-root’ doesn’t throw if the given store item does not exist.
So it could be written like this:

(if sha256
(mbegin %store-monad
(add-temp-root* item)
(if (valid-path?* item)
(return item)
(intern)))
(intern))

But then, we’d add one RPC for every ‘add-to-store’ RPC corresponding to
a patch (you can set “GUIX_PROFILING=rpc” to see the numbers), which is
not great.

Ludo’.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 5 Sep 2021 00:04
(name . Maxime Devos)(address . maximedevos@telenet.be)(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
87tuj0xaja.fsf@gnu.org
Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:

Toggle quote (24 lines)
> +(define-syntax search-patch
> + (lambda (s)
> + "Search the patch FILE-NAME and compute its hash at expansion time
> +if possible. Return #f if not found."
> + (syntax-case s ()
> + ((_ file-name)
> + (string? (syntax->datum #'file-name))
> + ;; FILE-NAME is a constant string, so the hash can be computed
> + ;; in advance.
> + (let ((patch (try-search-patch (syntax->datum #'file-name))))
> + (if patch
> + #`(%local-patch-file file-name #,(file-hash* patch #:select? true))
> + (begin
> + (warning (source-properties->location
> + (syntax-source #'file-name))
> + (G_ "~a: patch not found at expansion time")
> + (syntax->datum #'ile-name))
> + #'(%search-patch file-name)))))
> + ;; FILE-NAME is variable, so the hash cannot be pre-computed.
> + ((_ file-name) #'(%search-patch file-name))
> + ;; search-patch is being used used in a construct like
> + ;; (map search-patch ...).
> + (id (identifier? #'id) #'%search-patch))))

It’s clever… but also a bit evil, in that it changes the semantics of
package files in a surprising way. Modifying foo.patch without
recompiling foo.scm would lead you to still use the old foo.patch, which
can be rather off-putting and error-prone IMO.

To address this, ‘local-file’ could store the inode/mtime + computed
store file name (rather than the SHA256). ‘local-file-compiler’ would
check whether the actual file has matching inode/mtime before returning
the computed store file name. Problem is that inode/mtime are
guaranteed to differ once you’ve run “make install”. :-/


Intuitively, I’d have imagined a cache populated at run time; it would
map, say, file name/inode/mtime to a store file name. ‘add-to-store’
(or some wrapper above it) would check the cache and return the store
file name directly, unless ‘valid-path?’ says it no longer exists.
Downside is that this would be a per-user cache and you’d still pay the
cost until it’s warm. Advantage is that you could easily tell whether
it’s stale.

Thoughts?

Ludo’.
M
M
Maxime Devos wrote on 5 Sep 2021 21:48
[PATCH v2] Optimise search-patch (reducing I/O)
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
0ec7f0270fcccec730808f9210f074cd5339961f.camel@telenet.be
Ludovic Courtès schreef op zo 05-09-2021 om 00:04 [+0200]:
Toggle quote (31 lines)
> Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:
>
> > +(define-syntax search-patch
> > + (lambda (s)
> > + "Search the patch FILE-NAME and compute its hash at expansion time
> > +if possible. Return #f if not found."
> > + (syntax-case s ()
> > + ((_ file-name)
> > + (string? (syntax->datum #'file-name))
> > + ;; FILE-NAME is a constant string, so the hash can be computed
> > + ;; in advance.
> > + (let ((patch (try-search-patch (syntax->datum #'file-name))))
> > + (if patch
> > + #`(%local-patch-file file-name #,(file-hash* patch #:select? true))
> > + (begin
> > + (warning (source-properties->location
> > + (syntax-source #'file-name))
> > + (G_ "~a: patch not found at expansion time")
> > + (syntax->datum #'ile-name))
> > + #'(%search-patch file-name)))))
> > + ;; FILE-NAME is variable, so the hash cannot be pre-computed.
> > + ((_ file-name) #'(%search-patch file-name))
> > + ;; search-patch is being used used in a construct like
> > + ;; (map search-patch ...).
> > + (id (identifier? #'id) #'%search-patch))))
>
> It’s clever… but also a bit evil, in that it changes the semantics of
> package files in a surprising way. Modifying foo.patch without
> recompiling foo.scm would lead you to still use the old foo.patch, which
> can be rather off-putting and error-prone IMO.

I added two patches adding (limited) dependency tracking to compile-all.scm.
If a patch file is now modified or deleted, the corresponding package modules
will be recompiled. This should remove the ‘evilness’ I think.

Toggle quote (6 lines)
> To address this, ‘local-file’ could store the inode/mtime + computed
> store file name (rather than the SHA256). ‘local-file-compiler’ would
> check whether the actual file has matching inode/mtime before returning
> the computed store file name. Problem is that inode/mtime are
> guaranteed to differ once you’ve run “make install”. :-/

An additional problem is that 'local-file-compiler' would have to 'stat'
the file even if it is already in the store, undoing the (fairly limited?)
performance gains of this patch series.

The dependency tracking avoids this.

Toggle quote (10 lines)
> Intuitively, I’d have imagined a cache populated at run time; it would
> map, say, file name/inode/mtime to a store file name. ‘add-to-store’
> (or some wrapper above it) would check the cache and return the store
> file name directly, unless ‘valid-path?’ says it no longer exists.
> Downside is that this would be a per-user cache and you’d still pay the
> cost until it’s warm. Advantage is that you could easily tell whether
> it’s stale.
>
> Thoughts?

Intuitively, I'd have imagined doing as much as possible at compilation time.
The cost at compilation is only paid once (or, more correctly, at every
"guix pull"), while if you delay things until runtime, you need to check the
caches.

With this patch series (+ the two patches mentioned previously), the ‘cache’
is always fresh (though possibly not warm: the patch might not yet be in the
store).

Ludovic Courtès schreef op za 04-09-2021 om 23:47 [+0200]:
Toggle quote (43 lines)
> Hi!
>
> Some initial comments…
>
> Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:
>
> > +++ b/guix/gexp.scm
> > @@ -531,13 +531,37 @@ appears."
> > (define-gexp-compiler (local-file-compiler (file <local-file>) system target)
> > [...]
> > + (if sha256
> > + (let ((path (fixed-output-path name sha256 #:recursive? recursive?)))
> > + ;; If the hash is known in advance and the store already has the
> > + ;; item, there is no need to intern the file.
> > + (if (file-exists? path)
> > + (mbegin %store-monad
> > + ;; Tell the GC that PATH will be used, such that it won't
> > + ;; be deleted.
> > + ((store-lift add-temp-root) path)
> > + ;; The GC could have deleted the item before add-temp-root
> > + ;; completed, so check again if PATH exists.
> > + (if (file-exists? path)
> > + (return path)
> > + ;; If it has been removed, fall-back interning.
> > + (intern)))
> > + ;; If PATH does not yet exist, fall back to interning.
> > + (intern)))
> > + (intern))))))
>
> ‘file-exists?’ won’t work when talking to a remote store (e.g.,
> GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET=ssh://…).
>
> ‘add-temp-root’ doesn’t throw if the given store item does not exist.
> So it could be written like this:
>
> (if sha256
> (mbegin %store-monad
> (add-temp-root* item)
> (if (valid-path?* item)
> (return item)
> (intern)))
> (intern))

Done in the v2.

Toggle quote (6 lines)
> But then, we’d add one RPC for every ‘add-to-store’ RPC corresponding to
> a patch (you can set “GUIX_PROFILING=rpc” to see the numbers), which is
> not great.
>
> Ludo’.

Note that 'intern' is only called if the patch isn't yet in the store.
In practice, the patch is almost always already in the store. For example,
suppose I have a few packages in my profile. As the packages are in my
profile, they had to have their derivation computed at some point, so the
corresponding patches had to be interned.

If I now run "guix pull && guix package -u", when computing the derivation
of the updated profile, most required patches are already in the store,
because patches don't change often.

Likewise, if I run "guix environment guix" in one terminal, then in another,
then in yet another ... possibly for the first invocation, some patches need
to be interned, but for the other invocations, it's already in the store.

Because fixed-output-path is now called more often, I've added a patch
optimising (guix base32).

Let's compare the numbers again! This time, I've run

echo powersave |sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy{0,1,2,3}/scaling_governor

to make sure the CPU frequency doesn't change. On a hot (disk) cache:

# After the patch series
time GUIX_PROFILING="rpc gc" ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix build -d --no-grafts pigx

Remote procedure call summary: 5949 RPCs
built-in-builders ... 1
add-to-store ... 3
add-to-store/tree ... 26
add-temp-root ... 195
valid-path? ... 195
add-text-to-store ... 5529
Garbage collection statistics:
heap size: 93.85 MiB
allocated: 312.04 MiB
GC times: 17
time spent in GC: 3.34 seconds (25% of user time)

# averaged over three runs
real 0m14,035s
user 0m14,138s
sys 0m0,650s

# Before the patch series
time GUIX_PROFILING="rpc gc" ./the-unoptimised-guix/bin/guix build -d --no-grafts pigx
/gnu/store/fq6x8d2vcm6sbjkimg7g8kcgb4c5xv1b-pigx-0.0.3.drv
Remote procedure call summary: 5749 RPCs
built-in-builders ... 1
add-to-store/tree ... 26
add-to-store ... 193
add-text-to-store ... 5529
Garbage collection statistics:
heap size: 93.85 MiB
allocated: 325.24 MiB
GC times: 18
time spent in GC: 3.66 seconds (26% of user time)

real 0m13,700s
user 0m14,051s
sys 0m0,658s

So on a hot disk cache, there doesn't appear to be any improvement
(except for ‘time spent in GC’ -- presumably that's due to the optimisations
to guix/base32.scm).

What about a cold cache?

# After the patch series

sync && echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix --help
time GUIX_PROFILING="rpc gc" ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix build -d --no-grafts pigx
/gnu/store/fq6x8d2vcm6sbjkimg7g8kcgb4c5xv1b-pigx-0.0.3.drv
Remote procedure call summary: 5949 RPCs
built-in-builders ... 1
add-to-store ... 3
add-to-store/tree ... 26
add-temp-root ... 195
valid-path? ... 195
add-text-to-store ... 5529
Garbage collection statistics:
heap size: 93.85 MiB
allocated: 312.03 MiB
GC times: 17
time spent in GC: 3.37 seconds (23% of user time)

real 1m39,178s
user 0m14,557s
sys 0m0,990s

# Before the patch series
sync && echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
./the-unoptimised-guix/bin/guix --help
time GUIX_PROFILING="rpc gc" ./the-unoptimised-guix/bin/guix build -d --no-grafts pigx

Remote procedure call summary: 5749 RPCs
built-in-builders ... 1
add-to-store/tree ... 26
add-to-store ... 193
add-text-to-store ... 5529
Garbage collection statistics:
heap size: 93.85 MiB
allocated: 325.25 MiB
GC times: 18
time spent in GC: 3.63 seconds (25% of user time)

real 1m42,100s
user 0m14,690s
sys 0m1,127s

It seems that if the disk cache is cold, the time-to-derivation decreases
a little by this patch series. Much less than I had hoped for though; I'll
have to look into other areas for interesting performance gains ...

Greetings,
Maxime.
From a8e24a5258aa05689bcafa70af071da5296f63a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 20:09:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/9] build-self: Implement basic 'hash-algorithm'.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The module (guix hash) used from 'search-patch' in a future
patch needs it to be properly defined when (guix hash) is being
compiled. 'search-patch' is used when the derivation of Guix is
being computed, so it is important to avoid the ‘wrong type to
apply: #<syntax-transformer hash-algorithm>’ error.

* build-aux/build-self.scm
(build-program)[fake-gcrypt-hash]: Define hash-algorithm for sha1
and sha256.
---
build-aux/build-self.scm | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (26 lines)
diff --git a/build-aux/build-self.scm b/build-aux/build-self.scm
index 3a2d13cc09..2c13d9d530 100644
--- a/build-aux/build-self.scm
+++ b/build-aux/build-self.scm
@@ -259,8 +259,17 @@ interface (FFI) of Guile.")
(define fake-gcrypt-hash
;; Fake (gcrypt hash) module; see below.
(scheme-file "hash.scm"
- #~(define-module (gcrypt hash)
- #:export (sha1 sha256))))
+ #~(begin
+ (define-module (gcrypt hash)
+ #:export (sha1 sha256 hash-algorithm))
+ ;; Avoid ‘Wrong type to apply:
+ ;; #<syntax-transformer hash-algorithm>’ errors.
+ (define sha1)
+ (define sha256)
+ (define-syntax hash-algorithm
+ (syntax-rules (sha1 sha256)
+ ((_ sha1) 2)
+ ((_ sha256) 8))))))
(define fake-git
(scheme-file "git.scm" #~(define-module (git))))
--
2.33.0
From e5dc46800597023dfc1c9d53cc6e0db2f3999022 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 15:35:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] gexp: Allow computing the hash of the local file in
advance.

The new field is currently unused. The following patches will
populate and use the field to reduce the time-to-derivation
when the file is already interned in the store.

* guix/gexp.scm
(<local-file>): Add sha256 field.
(%local-file): Add sha256 argument for populating the field.
(local-file-compiler): Adjust 'match' expression.
---
guix/gexp.scm | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (51 lines)
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm
index f3d278b3e6..a633984688 100644
--- a/guix/gexp.scm
+++ b/guix/gexp.scm
@@ -419,13 +419,16 @@ Here TARGET is bound to the cross-compilation triplet or #f."
;; A local file name. FILE is the file name the user entered, which can be a
;; relative file name, and ABSOLUTE is a promise that computes its canonical
;; absolute file name. We keep it in a promise to compute it lazily and avoid
-;; repeated 'stat' calls.
+;; repeated 'stat' calls. Allow computing the hash of the file in advance,
+;; to avoid having to send the file to the daemon when it is already interned
+;; in the store.
(define-record-type <local-file>
- (%%local-file file absolute name recursive? select?)
+ (%%local-file file absolute name sha256 recursive? select?)
local-file?
(file local-file-file) ;string
(absolute %local-file-absolute-file-name) ;promise string
(name local-file-name) ;string
+ (sha256 local-file-sha256) ;sha256 bytevector | #f
(recursive? local-file-recursive?) ;Boolean
(select? local-file-select?)) ;string stat -> Boolean
@@ -434,6 +437,7 @@ Here TARGET is bound to the cross-compilation triplet or #f."
(define* (%local-file file promise #:optional (name (basename file))
#:key
(literal? #t) location
+ sha256
recursive? (select? true))
;; This intermediate procedure is part of our ABI, but the underlying
;; %%LOCAL-FILE is not.
@@ -441,7 +445,7 @@ Here TARGET is bound to the cross-compilation triplet or #f."
(warning (and=> location source-properties->location)
(G_ "resolving '~a' relative to current directory~%")
file))
- (%%local-file file promise name recursive? select?))
+ (%%local-file file promise name sha256 recursive? select?))
(define (absolute-file-name file directory)
"Return the canonical absolute file name for FILE, which lives in the
@@ -517,7 +521,7 @@ appears."
(define-gexp-compiler (local-file-compiler (file <local-file>) system target)
;; "Compile" FILE by adding it to the store.
(match file
- (($ <local-file> file (= force absolute) name recursive? select?)
+ (($ <local-file> file (= force absolute) name sha256 recursive? select?)
;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved. Failing
;; to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating a dangling
;; symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f 'add-to-store' would
--
2.33.0
From 8a64ac78767013e82f26cfddae951a8ef2e2caf8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 16:25:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/9] gexp: Allow overriding the absolute file name.

This will be used by the next patch to implement search-patch in
terms of local-file.

* guix/gexp.scm
(precanonicalized-file-name): New macro.
(local-file): Use the absolute file name from precanonicalized-file-name
when available.
---
guix/gexp.scm | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Toggle diff (46 lines)
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm
index a633984688..c69e4aa299 100644
--- a/guix/gexp.scm
+++ b/guix/gexp.scm
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
gexp-input-output
gexp-input-native?
+ precanonicalized-file-name
assume-valid-file-name
local-file
local-file?
@@ -463,6 +464,12 @@ the given file name is valid, even if it's not a string literal, and thus not
warn about it."
file)
+(define-syntax-rule (precanonicalized-file-name file absolute)
+ "This is a syntactic keyword to tell 'local-file' that it can assume that
+the given file name FILE has ABSOLUTE as absolute file name and 'local-file'
+does not need to compute the absolute file name by itself."
+ absolute)
+
(define-syntax local-file
(lambda (s)
"Return an object representing local file FILE to add to the store; this
@@ -481,7 +488,7 @@ where FILE is the entry's absolute file name and STAT is the result of
This is the declarative counterpart of the 'interned-file' monadic procedure.
It is implemented as a macro to capture the current source directory where it
appears."
- (syntax-case s (assume-valid-file-name)
+ (syntax-case s (assume-valid-file-name precanonicalized-file-name)
((_ file rest ...)
(string? (syntax->datum #'file))
;; FILE is a literal, so resolve it relative to the source directory.
@@ -495,6 +502,9 @@ appears."
#'(%local-file file
(delay (absolute-file-name file (getcwd)))
rest ...))
+ ((_ (precanonicalized-file-name file absolute) rest ...)
+ ;; Use the given file name ABSOLUTE as absolute file name.
+ #'(%local-file file (delay absolute) rest ...))
((_ file rest ...)
;; Resolve FILE relative to the current directory.
(with-syntax ((location (datum->syntax s (syntax-source s))))
--
2.33.0
Attachment: file
Attachment: file
From 2bc29d443dc5d6096962da3d5a1028473462c431 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 17:15:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/9] packages: Add patches to the dependency list of
package modules.

* gnu/packages.scm (search-patch): Call 'notice-dependency' on
the patch file.
---
gnu/packages.scm | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Toggle diff (27 lines)
diff --git a/gnu/packages.scm b/gnu/packages.scm
index f5552e5a9b..39929ae022 100644
--- a/gnu/packages.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages.scm
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
#:select ((package-name->name+version
. hyphen-separated-name->name+version)
mkdir-p))
+ ;; only required at expansion time
+ #:autoload (guix build compile) (notice-dependency)
#:use-module (guix profiles)
#:use-module (guix describe)
#:use-module (guix deprecation)
@@ -121,7 +123,10 @@ if possible. Return #f if not found."
;; in advance.
(let ((patch (try-search-patch (syntax->datum #'file-name))))
(if patch
- #`(%local-patch-file file-name #,(file-hash* patch #:select? true))
+ (begin
+ (notice-dependency patch)
+ #`(%local-patch-file file-name
+ #,(file-hash* patch #:select? true)))
(begin
(warning (source-properties->location
(syntax-source #'file-name))
--
2.33.0
From b6907f76040fa524110a503848ed9b9d9b19dfaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:10:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 8/9] gexp: Do not intern if the file is already in the
store.

* guix/gexp.scm (local-file-compiler): When the file is already in the
store, re-use the fixed output path instead of interning the file
again.
* guix/gexp.scm (add-temp-root*, valid-path?*): New procedures.
---
guix/gexp.scm | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (57 lines)
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm
index c69e4aa299..6a6d130110 100644
--- a/guix/gexp.scm
+++ b/guix/gexp.scm
@@ -528,16 +528,43 @@ appears."
'system-error' exception is raised if FILE could not be found."
(force (%local-file-absolute-file-name file)))
+(define add-temp-root* (store-lift add-temp-root))
+(define valid-path?* (store-lift valid-path?))
+
(define-gexp-compiler (local-file-compiler (file <local-file>) system target)
;; "Compile" FILE by adding it to the store.
(match file
- (($ <local-file> file (= force absolute) name sha256 recursive? select?)
- ;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved. Failing
- ;; to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating a dangling
- ;; symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f 'add-to-store' would
- ;; just throw an error, both of which are inconvenient.
- (interned-file absolute name
- #:recursive? recursive? #:select? select?))))
+ ;; Delay computing the absolute file name until 'intern', as this
+ ;; might be a relatively expensive computation (e.g. if search-patch
+ ;; is used), especially on a spinning disk.
+ (($ <local-file> file absolute-promise name sha256 recursive? select?)
+ (let ()
+ (define (intern)
+ ;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved.
+ ;; Failing to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating
+ ;; a dangling symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f
+ ;; 'add-to-store' would just throw an error, both of which are
+ ;; inconvenient.
+ (interned-file (force absolute-promise) name
+ #:recursive? recursive? #:select? select?))
+ ;; If the hash is known in advance and the store already has the
+ ;; item, there is no need to intern the file.
+ (if sha256
+ (let ((path (fixed-output-path name sha256 #:recursive? recursive?)))
+ (mbegin %store-monad
+ ;; Tell the GC that PATH will be used, such that it won't
+ ;; be deleted.
+ (add-temp-root* path)
+ ;; 'add-temp-root*' doesn't thow an error if the store item
+ ;; does not exist, so we need to check if PATH actually exists.
+ (mlet %store-monad
+ ((valid? (valid-path?* path)))
+ (if valid?
+ (return path)
+ ;; If it has been removed, fall-back interning.
+ (intern)))))
+ ;; If PATH does not yet exist, fall back to interning.
+ (intern))))))
(define-record-type <plain-file>
(%plain-file name content references)
--
2.33.0
From ccbaa1a4b447c67f997a63494a82c8e2b905dccd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 16:28:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 9/9] base32: Reduce GC pressure in
make-bytevector->base32-string.

The following code has been used to compare performance:

;; first 20 bytes of sha256 of #vu8(#xde #xad #xbe #xef)
(define bv #vu8(95 120 195 50 116 228 63 169 222 86 89 38 92 29 145 126 37 192 55 34))
,profile
(let loop ((n 0))
(when (< n #e1e6)
((@ (guix base32) bytevector->nix-base32-string) bv)
(loop (+ n 1))))

Before this change, the output was:

[...]
Sample count: 1140
Total time: 27.465560018 seconds (10.659331433 seconds in GC)

After this change, the output was:

[...]
Sample count: 957
Total time: 20.478847143 seconds (6.139721189 seconds in GC)

* guix/base32.scm
(make-bytevector->base32-string): Eliminate 'reverse', use mutation instead.
---
guix/base32.scm | 18 ++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (31 lines)
diff --git a/guix/base32.scm b/guix/base32.scm
index 49f191ba26..e76bf35ecc 100644
--- a/guix/base32.scm
+++ b/guix/base32.scm
@@ -141,12 +141,18 @@ the previous application or INIT."
(define (make-bytevector->base32-string quintet-fold base32-chars)
(lambda (bv)
"Return a base32 encoding of BV using BASE32-CHARS as the alphabet."
- (let ((chars (quintet-fold (lambda (q r)
- (cons (vector-ref base32-chars q)
- r))
- '()
- bv)))
- (list->string (reverse chars)))))
+ ;; Mutation can be avoided with 'reverse'. However, that would
+ ;; make this procedure about 30% slower due to the extra GC pressure.
+ (let* ((start (cons #f #f))
+ (end (quintet-fold (lambda (q r)
+ (define pair
+ (cons (vector-ref base32-chars q) #f))
+ (set-cdr! r pair)
+ pair)
+ start
+ bv)))
+ (set-cdr! end '())
+ (list->string (cdr start)))))
(define %nix-base32-chars
;; See `libutil/hash.cc'.
--
2.33.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYTUfBhccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7oPeAP9GUqwvLHvIKa8XYpazBkEbmcu7
QauxwC8cu3p0G1bjkwEAwCfKrddUJnIutjYFyTcMy+QPvcPsbaDsMEzMFODlnQY=
=v6yN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


M
M
Maxime Devos wrote on 6 Sep 2021 00:40
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
f30b144e0cfaa6187f8df2074d4fa0913f16b512.camel@telenet.be
Maxime Devos schreef op zo 05-09-2021 om 21:48 [+0200]:
Toggle quote (3 lines)
> Ludovic Courtès schreef op zo 05-09-2021 om 00:04 [+0200]:
> > Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:
> >
[..]
Toggle quote (4 lines)
> I added two patches adding (limited) dependency tracking to compile-all.scm.
> If a patch file is now modified or deleted, the corresponding package modules
> will be recompiled. This should remove the ‘evilness’ I think.

Oops, I forgot to include the following change to build-aux/compile-all.scm:

(or (not (file-exists? go))
(file-mtime<? go file)
- (any (cut file-mtime<? go <>) extra-dependencies))))
+ (any (lambda (dependency)
+ (or (not (file-exists? dependency))
+ (file-mtime<? go dependency))) extra-dependencies))))

It will be included in the v3.

Greetings,
Maxime.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYTVHWRccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7s5eAQCrVq4u1QOuqRzGfQf4cQKUUvLS
ngcmVX0ASeWj0U7Y9wD/WvkYGdPHfNg586iuPHeHu3Vl1YzQSJN9pA4goPouXg0=
=RVuf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 6 Sep 2021 10:39
Re: [bug#50384] [PATCH v2] Optimise search-patch (reducing I/O)
(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
864kayjdwz.fsf@gmail.com
Hi Maxime,

Thanks for looking at optimising stuff. :-)

On Sun, 05 Sep 2021 at 21:48, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:

Toggle quote (9 lines)
> Let's compare the numbers again! This time, I've run
>
> echo powersave |sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy{0,1,2,3}/scaling_governor
>
> to make sure the CPU frequency doesn't change. On a hot (disk) cache:
>
> # After the patch series
> time GUIX_PROFILING="rpc gc" ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix build -d --no-grafts pigx

[...]

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> So on a hot disk cache, there doesn't appear to be any improvement
> (except for ‘time spent in GC’ -- presumably that's due to the optimisations
> to guix/base32.scm).

Which kind of disk do you have? SSD, spinning HDD, other?


Toggle quote (25 lines)
> What about a cold cache?
>
> # After the patch series
>
> sync && echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix --help
> time GUIX_PROFILING="rpc gc" ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix build -d --no-grafts pigx
> /gnu/store/fq6x8d2vcm6sbjkimg7g8kcgb4c5xv1b-pigx-0.0.3.drv
> Remote procedure call summary: 5949 RPCs
> built-in-builders ... 1
> add-to-store ... 3
> add-to-store/tree ... 26
> add-temp-root ... 195
> valid-path? ... 195
> add-text-to-store ... 5529
> Garbage collection statistics:
> heap size: 93.85 MiB
> allocated: 312.03 MiB
> GC times: 17
> time spent in GC: 3.37 seconds (23% of user time)
>
> real 1m39,178s
> user 0m14,557s
> sys 0m0,990s

How the average (against 3 examples) looks like?

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> It seems that if the disk cache is cold, the time-to-derivation decreases
> a little by this patch series. Much less than I had hoped for though; I'll
> have to look into other areas for interesting performance gains ...

Please update the number using your diff showed in [1]. :-)


All the best,
simon
M
M
Maxime Devos wrote on 6 Sep 2021 12:06
(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
3491bccdaa15281fa254c2b788121cb42ea81adb.camel@telenet.be
zimoun schreef op ma 06-09-2021 om 10:39 [+0200]:
Toggle quote (23 lines)
> Hi Maxime,
>
> Thanks for looking at optimising stuff. :-)
>
> On Sun, 05 Sep 2021 at 21:48, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:
>
> > Let's compare the numbers again! This time, I've run
> >
> > echo powersave |sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq/policy{0,1,2,3}/scaling_governor
> >
> > to make sure the CPU frequency doesn't change. On a hot (disk) cache:
> >
> > # After the patch series
> > time GUIX_PROFILING="rpc gc" ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix build -d --no-grafts pigx
>
> [...]
>
> > So on a hot disk cache, there doesn't appear to be any improvement
> > (except for ‘time spent in GC’ -- presumably that's due to the optimisations
> > to guix/base32.scm).
>
> Which kind of disk do you have? SSD, spinning HDD, other?

A spinning disk, presumably a HDD. FWIW, it's a ‘TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 (AX1P2C)’
that has been ‘on’ for 10 months and 10 days, according to ‘SMART-data and selftests’
I just noticed it has ‘2304 bad sectors’. Maybe I should make backups and run file
system checks?

Toggle quote (28 lines)
>
> > What about a cold cache?
> >
> > # After the patch series
> >
> > sync && echo 3 | sudo tee /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
> > ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix --help
> > time GUIX_PROFILING="rpc gc" ./the-optimised-guix/bin/guix build -d --no-grafts pigx
> > /gnu/store/fq6x8d2vcm6sbjkimg7g8kcgb4c5xv1b-pigx-0.0.3.drv
> > Remote procedure call summary: 5949 RPCs
> > built-in-builders ... 1
> > add-to-store ... 3
> > add-to-store/tree ... 26
> > add-temp-root ... 195
> > valid-path? ... 195
> > add-text-to-store ... 5529
> > Garbage collection statistics:
> > heap size: 93.85 MiB
> > allocated: 312.03 MiB
> > GC times: 17
> > time spent in GC: 3.37 seconds (23% of user time)
> >
> > real 1m39,178s
> > user 0m14,557s
> > sys 0m0,990s
>
> How the average (against 3 examples) looks like?

I'll try to optimise more things and report the average for the v3.

Toggle quote (9 lines)
> > It seems that if the disk cache is cold, the time-to-derivation decreases
> > a little by this patch series. Much less than I had hoped for though; I'll
> > have to look into other areas for interesting performance gains ...
>
> Please update the number using your diff showed in [1]. :-)
>
>
> 1: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/50384#4>

Are you referring to:

Toggle quote (8 lines)
> Oops, I forgot to include the following change to build-aux/compile-all.scm:
> (or (not (file-exists? go))
> (file-mtime<? go file)
> - (any (cut file-mtime<? go <>) extra-dependencies))))
> + (any (lambda (dependency)
> + (or (not (file-exists? dependency))
> + (file-mtime<? go dependency))) extra-dependencies))))

That's compilation-time only, so that cannot affect the timing of "guix build -d ...".

Geetings,
Maxime.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYTXoCBccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7knUAPsFC+FnKuZi84gnBq8MxOI30aMh
oaD+uWxdH1s8I5b8ZAEAql84Fw0nw5HENSkMgpGhxMjdtFg2m8YfXq0rCupfrg0=
=ihV5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


M
M
Maxime Devos wrote on 7 Sep 2021 17:36
Base16 and base32 optimisations split off
aefe08ead06d3054308fe6101bbf7b174bbc0c57.camel@telenet.be
I split off the base16 and base32 optimisations
to a separate patch series: 50456@debbugs.gnu.org.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYTeHGxccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7vHIAP9HaFsK5/PDqxGZIPrXymwN4QiZ
Q27xDLZCo9RSk4YQTAD/b/0b1jDshU+EVtF3PN/6lmo+F9DzTrwr/nxjqwZ6/Qg=
=ztev
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 9 Sep 2021 16:51
Re: bug#50384: [PATCH] Optimise search-patch (reducing I/O)
(name . Maxime Devos)(address . maximedevos@telenet.be)(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
87ee9xerac.fsf_-_@gnu.org
Hello,

Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:

Toggle quote (12 lines)
>> To address this, ‘local-file’ could store the inode/mtime + computed
>> store file name (rather than the SHA256). ‘local-file-compiler’ would
>> check whether the actual file has matching inode/mtime before returning
>> the computed store file name. Problem is that inode/mtime are
>> guaranteed to differ once you’ve run “make install”. :-/
>
> An additional problem is that 'local-file-compiler' would have to 'stat'
> the file even if it is already in the store, undoing the (fairly limited?)
> performance gains of this patch series.
>
> The dependency tracking avoids this.

OK.

Toggle quote (12 lines)
>> Intuitively, I’d have imagined a cache populated at run time; it would
>> map, say, file name/inode/mtime to a store file name. ‘add-to-store’
>> (or some wrapper above it) would check the cache and return the store
>> file name directly, unless ‘valid-path?’ says it no longer exists.
>> Downside is that this would be a per-user cache and you’d still pay the
>> cost until it’s warm. Advantage is that you could easily tell whether
>> it’s stale.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> Intuitively, I'd have imagined doing as much as possible at compilation time.

Of course, but it’s important for the caching model to match “reality”,
which is that patch files live independently of the source files that
refer to them.

I’d all be fine if ‘local-file’ were to inline file contents at
macro-expansion time, because then we could be sure the hash and
contents match (but I’m not saying we should do this…).

What we could do is have a boolean saying whether the cached value is
authoritative, similar to what’s in (gnu packages). That way, when
using ./pre-inst-env or passing a -L flag or setting GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH,
the cached value would not be authoritative; we’d be safe, without
needing ad hoc dependency tracking.

Thoughts?

[...]

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> Because fixed-output-path is now called more often, I've added a patch
> optimising (guix base32).

[...]

Toggle quote (15 lines)
> From e5dc46800597023dfc1c9d53cc6e0db2f3999022 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
> Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 15:35:51 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/9] gexp: Allow computing the hash of the local file in
> advance.
>
> The new field is currently unused. The following patches will
> populate and use the field to reduce the time-to-derivation
> when the file is already interned in the store.
>
> * guix/gexp.scm
> (<local-file>): Add sha256 field.
> (%local-file): Add sha256 argument for populating the field.
> (local-file-compiler): Adjust 'match' expression.

[...]

Toggle quote (12 lines)
> +;; repeated 'stat' calls. Allow computing the hash of the file in advance,
> +;; to avoid having to send the file to the daemon when it is already interned
> +;; in the store.
> (define-record-type <local-file>
> - (%%local-file file absolute name recursive? select?)
> + (%%local-file file absolute name sha256 recursive? select?)
> local-file?
> (file local-file-file) ;string
> (absolute %local-file-absolute-file-name) ;promise string
> (name local-file-name) ;string
> + (sha256 local-file-sha256) ;sha256 bytevector | #f

Could we store the result of ‘fixed-output-path’ rather than the SHA256,
while we’re at it?

Again, care must be taken because it’s possible to set NIX_STORE_DIR at
run time, which may invalidate the pre-computed store file name.

Can we make hash/file name computation a feature of ‘local-file’ rather
than one of ‘search-patch’ as in these patches? I’d rather not provide
a way to override this new field.

There are cases where we cannot know the value of ‘recursive?’ at
expansion time, for instance if the user wrote:

(local-file "foo.txt" #:recursive? r)

In that case, we cannot compute the hash or file name.

Thanks,
Ludo’.
M
M
Maxime Devos wrote on 9 Sep 2021 22:25
[PATCH v3] Optimise search-patch (reducing I/O)
(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
04603bca34f16b284a5e3052a4b0765b60952817.camel@telenet.be
Hi guix,

This is a v3, without the base16 and base32 optimisations which
are split-off into https://issues.guix.gnu.org/50456. It doesn't
seem this patch series will bring improvements, but feel free to test
(in particular, I wonder if this will help people using a remote daemon,
where transmitting data can take (relatively) long?).

(guix scripts hash) is broken, which would need to be fixed in the final
version, if any. Ludovic has some concerns about dependency tracking in
search-patch which need to be adressed.

I think a more fruitful goal is to somehow parallelize the derivation
computation, with multiple separate connections to the store, such that
if one connection is blocking, the other one can be used for something
separate (threads aren't necessary if current-read-waiter,
current-write-waiter and non-blocking I/O are used).

Now, what improvements does this version of the patch series bring?
(Make sure to start the daemon with ./pre-inst-env guix daemon ...,
and set --localstatedir=/var! Some changes to the daemon were made.)

1. RPC count (tested in a local checkout)

After the patch series:
make && GUIX_PROFILING=rpc ./pre-inst-env guix build -d pigx --no-grafts
accepted connection from pid 4917, user [USER]

/gnu/store/jfjfg7dnis7v6947a0rncxdn3y1nz0ad-pigx-0.0.3.drv
Remote procedure call summary: 5754 RPCs
built-in-builders ... 1
add-to-store ... 3
add-to-store/tree ... 26
add-temp-root-and-valid-path? ... 195
add-text-to-store ... 5529

After the patch series, with (if sha256 ...) replaced with (if #f ...)
in (guix gexp), to simulate the situation before the patch series

/gnu/store/jfjfg7dnis7v6947a0rncxdn3y1nz0ad-pigx-0.0.3.drv
Remote procedure call summary: 5749 RPCs
built-in-builders ... 1
add-to-store/tree ... 26
add-to-store ... 193
add-text-to-store ... 5529

(add-to-store RPCs are converted to add-temp-root-and-valid-path? RPCs)

2. Timing

First do
echo powersave | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu{0,1,2,3}/cpufreq/scaling_governor
to eliminate CPU frequency scaling effects.
To automatically repeat the tests and compute the standard deviation,
'hyperfine' is used:
HYP=/gnu/store/3ya4iw6fzq1ns73bv1g3a96jvwhbv60c-hyperfine-1.11.0/bin/hyperfine

To determine the effect of the change to 'local-file-compiler' and
'search-patch' and nothing else, I will compare the performance of guix
after the patch series with the performance of guix after the patch series
and 'sha256' replaced by #false.

With #f, --runs=60:
make && ./pre-inst-env $HYP --runs=60 --warmup 1 -- 'guix build -d pigx --no-grafts'
Time (mean ± σ): 15.428 s ± 0.385 s [User: 15.925 s, System: 0.652 s]
Range (min … max): 14.768 s … 16.550 s 60 runs

With sha256, --runs=60
make && ./pre-inst-env $HYP --runs=60 --warmup 1 -- 'guix build -d pigx --no-grafts'
Time (mean ± σ): 15.493 s ± 0.252 s [User: 15.585 s, System: 0.680 s]
Range (min … max): 14.981 s … 16.294 s 60 runs

These numbers don't have a clear difference. Maybe statistics can help? First,
formulate a null-hypothesis. As the total number of RPCs didn't change, the amount
of data sent to the daemon is reduced and some "stats", "open" and "reads" are avoided,
I would expect that the mean decreases. Thus, as null-hypothesis, I choose:

H0: the (theoretical) mean for ‘with sha256’ is less than the mean for ‘with #f’

In the timing tests, the observed mean for 'with sha256’ is actually larger.
But is this significant?

guix environment --ad-hoc r
before.mean = 15.428
before.stddev = 0.385
after.mean = 15.493
after.stddev = 0.252
samples = 60

# ‘statistical’ crate used by hyperfine
# performs N/(N-1) correction XXX

t = (before.mean - after.mean)/(sqrt(samples) * sqrt(before.stddev^2 + after.stddev^2))
v = (samples - 1) * (before.stddev^2 + after.stddev^2)^2/(before.stddev^4 + after.stddev^4)

q = dt(-t, v); q
# p-value: 0.5072571
# Null-hypothesis is not rejected

It's not rejected, though that doesn't prove much since t is almost zero,
so this test cannot reject the hypothesis ‘the means are equal’ or ‘the patch
series makes things slower’ either.

I don't think this patch series helps on my laptop (at least on a hot disk cache, I'd have
to check for a cold cache). However, I wonder if this would help a little for people
using a remote build daemon (with a nfs setup or something) (see GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET)?

Greetings,
Maxime.
From cfffe62fff71885db9feb1c46ee5d0b6bbe2f4c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 20:09:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/10] build-self: Implement basic 'hash-algorithm'.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

The module (guix hash) used from 'search-patch' in a future
patch needs it to be properly defined when (guix hash) is being
compiled. 'search-patch' is used when the derivation of Guix is
being computed, so it is important to avoid the ‘wrong type to
apply: #<syntax-transformer hash-algorithm>’ error.

* build-aux/build-self.scm
(build-program)[fake-gcrypt-hash]: Define hash-algorithm for sha1
and sha256.
---
build-aux/build-self.scm | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (26 lines)
diff --git a/build-aux/build-self.scm b/build-aux/build-self.scm
index 3a2d13cc09..2c13d9d530 100644
--- a/build-aux/build-self.scm
+++ b/build-aux/build-self.scm
@@ -259,8 +259,17 @@ interface (FFI) of Guile.")
(define fake-gcrypt-hash
;; Fake (gcrypt hash) module; see below.
(scheme-file "hash.scm"
- #~(define-module (gcrypt hash)
- #:export (sha1 sha256))))
+ #~(begin
+ (define-module (gcrypt hash)
+ #:export (sha1 sha256 hash-algorithm))
+ ;; Avoid ‘Wrong type to apply:
+ ;; #<syntax-transformer hash-algorithm>’ errors.
+ (define sha1)
+ (define sha256)
+ (define-syntax hash-algorithm
+ (syntax-rules (sha1 sha256)
+ ((_ sha1) 2)
+ ((_ sha256) 8))))))
(define fake-git
(scheme-file "git.scm" #~(define-module (git))))
--
2.33.0
Attachment: file
From 43578f3fbb7f184881ae4f1ca6b4cf3df8b67c11 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2021 18:59:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 04/10] store: Add compatibility fall-back for
'add-temp-root-and-valid-path?'.

* guix/store.scm (add-temp-root-and-valid-path?): Rename to ...
(add-temp-root-and-valid-path*?): ... this.
(add-temp-root-and-valid-path?): New procedure.
---
guix/store.scm | 16 ++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (45 lines)
diff --git a/guix/store.scm b/guix/store.scm
index c9f7b905b7..f2fb246fca 100644
--- a/guix/store.scm
+++ b/guix/store.scm
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2019, 2020 Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
;;; Copyright © 2020 Florian Pelz <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>
;;; Copyright © 2020 Lars-Dominik Braun <ldb@leibniz-psychology.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2021 Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -124,7 +125,7 @@
ensure-path
find-roots
add-temp-root
- add-temp-root-and-valid-path?
+ (add-temp-root-and-valid-path*? . add-temp-root-and-valid-path?)
add-indirect-root
add-permanent-root
remove-permanent-root
@@ -1459,9 +1460,20 @@ Return #t."
(define-operation (add-temp-root-and-valid-path? (store-path path))
"Make PATH a temporary root for the duration of the current session,
-and test if PATH is a valid store path (see 'valid-path?')."
+and test if PATH is a valid store path (see 'valid-path?'). This requires
+a recent daemon version (#x164 or later); use 'add-temp-root-and-valid-path*?'
+for compatibility."
boolean)
+(define (add-temp-root-and-valid-path*? store path)
+ "Make PATH a temporary root for the duration of the current session,
+and test if PATH is a valid store path (see 'valid-path?')."
+ (if (>= (store-connection-minor-version store) #x64)
+ (add-temp-root-and-valid-path? store path)
+ (begin
+ (add-temp-root store path)
+ (valid-path? store path))))
+
(define-operation (add-indirect-root (string file-name))
"Make the symlink FILE-NAME an indirect root for the garbage collector:
whatever store item FILE-NAME points to will not be collected. Return #t on
--
2.33.0
From 75cb3a1e7b00b95b2aa05373bc7c0e836766c8c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 15:35:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] gexp: Allow computing the hash of the local file in
advance.

The new field is currently unused. The following patches will
populate and use the field to reduce the time-to-derivation
when the file is already interned in the store.

* guix/gexp.scm
(<local-file>): Add sha256 field.
(%local-file): Add sha256 argument for populating the field.
(local-file-compiler): Adjust 'match' expression.
---
guix/gexp.scm | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (51 lines)
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm
index f3d278b3e6..a633984688 100644
--- a/guix/gexp.scm
+++ b/guix/gexp.scm
@@ -419,13 +419,16 @@ Here TARGET is bound to the cross-compilation triplet or #f."
;; A local file name. FILE is the file name the user entered, which can be a
;; relative file name, and ABSOLUTE is a promise that computes its canonical
;; absolute file name. We keep it in a promise to compute it lazily and avoid
-;; repeated 'stat' calls.
+;; repeated 'stat' calls. Allow computing the hash of the file in advance,
+;; to avoid having to send the file to the daemon when it is already interned
+;; in the store.
(define-record-type <local-file>
- (%%local-file file absolute name recursive? select?)
+ (%%local-file file absolute name sha256 recursive? select?)
local-file?
(file local-file-file) ;string
(absolute %local-file-absolute-file-name) ;promise string
(name local-file-name) ;string
+ (sha256 local-file-sha256) ;sha256 bytevector | #f
(recursive? local-file-recursive?) ;Boolean
(select? local-file-select?)) ;string stat -> Boolean
@@ -434,6 +437,7 @@ Here TARGET is bound to the cross-compilation triplet or #f."
(define* (%local-file file promise #:optional (name (basename file))
#:key
(literal? #t) location
+ sha256
recursive? (select? true))
;; This intermediate procedure is part of our ABI, but the underlying
;; %%LOCAL-FILE is not.
@@ -441,7 +445,7 @@ Here TARGET is bound to the cross-compilation triplet or #f."
(warning (and=> location source-properties->location)
(G_ "resolving '~a' relative to current directory~%")
file))
- (%%local-file file promise name recursive? select?))
+ (%%local-file file promise name sha256 recursive? select?))
(define (absolute-file-name file directory)
"Return the canonical absolute file name for FILE, which lives in the
@@ -517,7 +521,7 @@ appears."
(define-gexp-compiler (local-file-compiler (file <local-file>) system target)
;; "Compile" FILE by adding it to the store.
(match file
- (($ <local-file> file (= force absolute) name recursive? select?)
+ (($ <local-file> file (= force absolute) name sha256 recursive? select?)
;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved. Failing
;; to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating a dangling
;; symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f 'add-to-store' would
--
2.33.0
From d647fd713b0a9e2b1b1bcacfa9546da9ce23c690 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 16:25:22 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] gexp: Allow overriding the absolute file name.

This will be used by the next patch to implement search-patch in
terms of local-file.

* guix/gexp.scm
(precanonicalized-file-name): New macro.
(local-file): Use the absolute file name from precanonicalized-file-name
when available.
---
guix/gexp.scm | 12 +++++++++++-
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Toggle diff (46 lines)
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm
index a633984688..c69e4aa299 100644
--- a/guix/gexp.scm
+++ b/guix/gexp.scm
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
gexp-input-output
gexp-input-native?
+ precanonicalized-file-name
assume-valid-file-name
local-file
local-file?
@@ -463,6 +464,12 @@ the given file name is valid, even if it's not a string literal, and thus not
warn about it."
file)
+(define-syntax-rule (precanonicalized-file-name file absolute)
+ "This is a syntactic keyword to tell 'local-file' that it can assume that
+the given file name FILE has ABSOLUTE as absolute file name and 'local-file'
+does not need to compute the absolute file name by itself."
+ absolute)
+
(define-syntax local-file
(lambda (s)
"Return an object representing local file FILE to add to the store; this
@@ -481,7 +488,7 @@ where FILE is the entry's absolute file name and STAT is the result of
This is the declarative counterpart of the 'interned-file' monadic procedure.
It is implemented as a macro to capture the current source directory where it
appears."
- (syntax-case s (assume-valid-file-name)
+ (syntax-case s (assume-valid-file-name precanonicalized-file-name)
((_ file rest ...)
(string? (syntax->datum #'file))
;; FILE is a literal, so resolve it relative to the source directory.
@@ -495,6 +502,9 @@ appears."
#'(%local-file file
(delay (absolute-file-name file (getcwd)))
rest ...))
+ ((_ (precanonicalized-file-name file absolute) rest ...)
+ ;; Use the given file name ABSOLUTE as absolute file name.
+ #'(%local-file file (delay absolute) rest ...))
((_ file rest ...)
;; Resolve FILE relative to the current directory.
(with-syntax ((location (datum->syntax s (syntax-source s))))
--
2.33.0
Attachment: file
Attachment: file
From d9c3ffce927782ce2ef8943784f0e7b5cd466fec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 17:15:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] packages: Add patches to the dependency list of package
modules.

* gnu/packages.scm (search-patch): Call 'notice-dependency' on
the patch file.
---
gnu/packages.scm | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Toggle diff (27 lines)
diff --git a/gnu/packages.scm b/gnu/packages.scm
index f5552e5a9b..39929ae022 100644
--- a/gnu/packages.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages.scm
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
#:select ((package-name->name+version
. hyphen-separated-name->name+version)
mkdir-p))
+ ;; only required at expansion time
+ #:autoload (guix build compile) (notice-dependency)
#:use-module (guix profiles)
#:use-module (guix describe)
#:use-module (guix deprecation)
@@ -121,7 +123,10 @@ if possible. Return #f if not found."
;; in advance.
(let ((patch (try-search-patch (syntax->datum #'file-name))))
(if patch
- #`(%local-patch-file file-name #,(file-hash* patch #:select? true))
+ (begin
+ (notice-dependency patch)
+ #`(%local-patch-file file-name
+ #,(file-hash* patch #:select? true)))
(begin
(warning (source-properties->location
(syntax-source #'file-name))
--
2.33.0
From d359fefabf2831e42aea6edf646a9e0373be5d0f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2021 18:10:32 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 10/10] gexp: Do not intern if the file is already in the
store.

* guix/gexp.scm (local-file-compiler): When the file is already in the
store, re-use the fixed output path instead of interning the file
again.
* guix/gexp.scm (add-temp-root-and-valid-path?*): New procedure.
---
guix/gexp.scm | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (48 lines)
diff --git a/guix/gexp.scm b/guix/gexp.scm
index c69e4aa299..20c9d93170 100644
--- a/guix/gexp.scm
+++ b/guix/gexp.scm
@@ -528,16 +528,34 @@ appears."
'system-error' exception is raised if FILE could not be found."
(force (%local-file-absolute-file-name file)))
+(define add-temp-root-and-valid-path?* (store-lift add-temp-root-and-valid-path?))
+
(define-gexp-compiler (local-file-compiler (file <local-file>) system target)
;; "Compile" FILE by adding it to the store.
(match file
- (($ <local-file> file (= force absolute) name sha256 recursive? select?)
- ;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved. Failing
- ;; to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating a dangling
- ;; symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f 'add-to-store' would
- ;; just throw an error, both of which are inconvenient.
- (interned-file absolute name
- #:recursive? recursive? #:select? select?))))
+ ;; Delay computing the absolute file name until 'intern', as this
+ ;; might be a relatively expensive computation (e.g. if search-patch
+ ;; is used), especially on a spinning disk.
+ (($ <local-file> file absolute-promise name sha256 recursive? select?)
+ (let ()
+ (define (intern)
+ ;; Canonicalize FILE so that if it's a symlink, it is resolved.
+ ;; Failing to do that, when RECURSIVE? is #t, we could end up creating
+ ;; a dangling symlink in the store, and when RECURSIVE? is #f
+ ;; 'add-to-store' would just throw an error, both of which are
+ ;; inconvenient.
+ (interned-file (force absolute-promise) name
+ #:recursive? recursive? #:select? select?))
+ ;; If the hash is known in advance and the store already has the
+ ;; item, there is no need to intern the file.
+ (if sha256
+ (let ((path (fixed-output-path name sha256 #:recursive? recursive?)))
+ (mlet %store-monad ((valid? (add-temp-root-and-valid-path?* path)))
+ (if valid?
+ (return path)
+ (intern))))
+ ;; If PATH does not yet exist, fall back to interning.
+ (intern))))))
(define-record-type <plain-file>
(%plain-file name content references)
--
2.33.0
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYTptyhccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7g5MAQCYR/HigA+hNpUcnd/dyzE292kC
5+dDA2yZMO86lbwZkgD/SKntJUezYbdYRp1wspCfqNVsTfodQkufXNP1UnYMygA=
=+x9D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


M
M
Maxime Devos wrote on 10 Sep 2021 11:54
(address . 50384-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
d989362bf612f305891c30339d34bcd68196fe8a.camel@telenet.be
It doesn't seem like the patch series is going
to end up improving anything, so I'm closing it.

Greetings,
Maxime
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYTsrXBccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7sgFAQDRkDHAX5JIQv5D7szRQiFx8vxr
RnZ4TMHFCxdUfWB3jwD+LxyX6J51HBZkPvzRA7eQpnfx+9SNuqe4E4bTLjLX5ws=
=7nyo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Closed
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 21 Sep 2021 17:50
control message for bug #50384
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
878rzqj5bm.fsf@gnu.org
reopen 50384
tags 50384 - fixed patch
quit
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 21 Sep 2021 18:55
[PATCH v4] Optimise search-patch (reducing I/O)
(name . Maxime Devos)(address . maximedevos@telenet.be)(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
87r1dhj2bk.fsf_-_@gnu.org
Hi!

I took the liberty to reopen this patch because there were good ideas
IMO. I’m sorry if my many questions and lack of responsiveness came out
as a suggestion that this approach wasn’t good.

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

Toggle quote (15 lines)
>> +;; repeated 'stat' calls. Allow computing the hash of the file in advance,
>> +;; to avoid having to send the file to the daemon when it is already interned
>> +;; in the store.
>> (define-record-type <local-file>
>> - (%%local-file file absolute name recursive? select?)
>> + (%%local-file file absolute name sha256 recursive? select?)
>> local-file?
>> (file local-file-file) ;string
>> (absolute %local-file-absolute-file-name) ;promise string
>> (name local-file-name) ;string
>> + (sha256 local-file-sha256) ;sha256 bytevector | #f
>
> Could we store the result of ‘fixed-output-path’ rather than the SHA256,
> while we’re at it?

I tried that with the patch below, roughly taking the same approach as
your patch series, but somewhat simplified, mostly so I could
experiment.

I changed just a few files to use the new ‘local-patches’ instead of
‘search-patches’ (I thought it might make sense to introduce a new
macro, to make it clear that ‘%package-module-path’ is not used at all).

The end result is that it works as intended :-), but it’s actually a
tiny bit slower: on a cache hit, we do 2 RPCs (add-temp-root +
valid-path?) instead of 1 (add-to-store). The extra round-trip is more
expensive than the I/O we’re saving, at least on my laptop (with SSD; it
might be different with slower disk I/O and/or when talking to a remote
daemon, as on clusters.)

Now, this could be addressed by adding an ‘add-temp-root-if-valid’ RPC,
which would do both in one.

We can estimate the performance of that strategy by commenting out the
‘add-temp-root*’ call (thus getting a single RPC) in
‘local-file-compiler’: this time it’s slightly faster, but we’re in the
1% range on the wall-clock time of ‘guix build pigx -d --no-grafts’:

Toggle snippet (26 lines)
$ time GUIX_DISABLE_LOCAL_FILE_CACHE=t ./pre-inst-env guix build pigx -d --no-grafts
/gnu/store/dqaknknlsw8a97xwjrhhd1g4jg71jqg7-pigx-0.0.3.drv

real 0m3.488s
user 0m3.718s
sys 0m0.132s
$ time GUIX_DISABLE_LOCAL_FILE_CACHE=t ./pre-inst-env guix build pigx -d --no-grafts
/gnu/store/dqaknknlsw8a97xwjrhhd1g4jg71jqg7-pigx-0.0.3.drv

real 0m3.501s
user 0m3.722s
sys 0m0.138s
$ time ./pre-inst-env guix build pigx -d --no-grafts
/gnu/store/dqaknknlsw8a97xwjrhhd1g4jg71jqg7-pigx-0.0.3.drv

real 0m3.437s
user 0m3.622s
sys 0m0.174s
$ time ./pre-inst-env guix build pigx -d --no-grafts
/gnu/store/dqaknknlsw8a97xwjrhhd1g4jg71jqg7-pigx-0.0.3.drv

real 0m3.492s
user 0m3.708s
sys 0m0.151s

Perhaps the gains would be a bit higher if we change all the package
files to use ‘local-patches’, but we probably can’t expect a lot more
anyway since that process is CPU-bound.

So I don’t know. It feels like a worthy optimization, and one that’s
manageable from a maintenance viewpoint, but it buys us very little.

Thoughts?

Looking at the big picture, what I’d like to have is a package
derivation cache designed in such a way that “guix install foo” wouldn’t
even need to load any package module on a cache hit. That’d make a
noticeable difference performance-wise, that’s another level of
complexity… (I have a rough design in mind that we could discuss.)

Ludo’.
Attachment: file
M
M
Maxime Devos wrote on 23 Sep 2021 19:26
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
3563a99b37c8ef3b226b7fef25a5afa273c08b6e.camel@telenet.be
Ludovic Courtès schreef op di 21-09-2021 om 18:55 [+0200]:
Toggle quote (6 lines)
> Hi!
>
> I took the liberty to reopen this patch because there were good ideas
> IMO. I’m sorry if my many questions and lack of responsiveness came out
> as a suggestion that this approach wasn’t good.

I reordered your mail a little.

Toggle quote (6 lines)
> Looking at the big picture, what I’d like to have is a package
> derivation cache designed in such a way that “guix install foo” wouldn’t
> even need to load any package module on a cache hit. That’d make a
> noticeable difference performance-wise, that’s another level of
> complexity… (I have a rough design in mind that we could discuss.)

This ‘package derivation cache’ seems an interesting idea to pursue,
though I wonder what could be used as ‘keys’ in the derivation cache.

Package names aren't sufficient because packages can have multiple versions,
package names + package versions aren't sufficient because packages can have
multiple variants. Grafts might need some care. Having multiple versions of
guix can be addressed by including the commits of every channel in the key.

Even if ‘foo’ isn't in the cache, the cache can still be useful if the
inputs ‘bar’ and ‘baz’ of foo are in the cache.

Toggle quote (17 lines)
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
>
> > > +;; repeated 'stat' calls. Allow computing the hash of the file in advance,
> > > +;; to avoid having to send the file to the daemon when it is already interned
> > > +;; in the store.
> > > (define-record-type <local-file>
> > > - (%%local-file file absolute name recursive? select?)
> > > + (%%local-file file absolute name sha256 recursive? select?)
> > > local-file?
> > > (file local-file-file) ;string
> > > (absolute %local-file-absolute-file-name) ;promise string
> > > (name local-file-name) ;string
> > > + (sha256 local-file-sha256) ;sha256 bytevector | #f
> >
> > Could we store the result of ‘fixed-output-path’ rather than the SHA256,
> > while we’re at it?

Embedding the result of ‘fixed-output-path’ in the .go might be problematic
from a closure size perspective, as that would create additional references in the
store items of guix.

Toggle quote (18 lines)
> I tried that with the patch below, roughly taking the same approach as
> your patch series, but somewhat simplified, mostly so I could
> experiment. [...]
>
> We can estimate the performance of that strategy by commenting out the
> ‘add-temp-root*’ call (thus getting a single RPC) in
> ‘local-file-compiler’: this time it’s slightly faster, but we’re in the
> 1% range on the wall-clock time of ‘guix build pigx -d --no-grafts’:
> [...]
> Perhaps the gains would be a bit higher if we change all the package
> files to use ‘local-patches’, but we probably can’t expect a lot more
> anyway since that process is CPU-bound.
>
> So I don’t know. It feels like a worthy optimization, and one that’s
> manageable from a maintenance viewpoint, but it buys us very little.
>
> Thoughts?

As it is only <1%, I would prefer trying the ‘package derivation cache’
first, as it seems to have more potential.

Toggle quote (2 lines)
> Ludo’.
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYUy42xccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7o0YAP92vmojOgaiI7vtCjLc3x/akVtC
Gx8kiPOKLtr/2bgDIQEAt7YyiFMiVPXJwFRjL4D80kJ4sR/P7yISSYev/7IUjwA=
=26Wc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 27 Sep 2021 18:17
(name . Maxime Devos)(address . maximedevos@telenet.be)(address . 50384@debbugs.gnu.org)
87czouj8m7.fsf@gnu.org
Hi,

Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> skribis:

Toggle quote (2 lines)
> Ludovic Courtès schreef op di 21-09-2021 om 18:55 [+0200]:

[...]

Toggle quote (9 lines)
>> Looking at the big picture, what I’d like to have is a package
>> derivation cache designed in such a way that “guix install foo” wouldn’t
>> even need to load any package module on a cache hit. That’d make a
>> noticeable difference performance-wise, that’s another level of
>> complexity… (I have a rough design in mind that we could discuss.)
>
> This ‘package derivation cache’ seems an interesting idea to pursue,
> though I wonder what could be used as ‘keys’ in the derivation cache.

The existing package (used by ‘find-packages-by-name’ & co.) already has
keys: the module and variable name of a top-level package definition.

More precisely, there’d be two keys: (1) a hash of the channel instance
commits being used (as you wrote), and (2) the module/variable name.
That means we’d only keep packages with a public top-level definition in
the cache.


Rough design sketch:

The idea I have in mind would be to have <package> be a sub-record-type
of <proto-package>, where <proto-package> would contain only the
metadata currently provided by ‘fold-available-packages’ (mainly: name,
version, module/variable).

<proto-package> would have a gexp compiler that looks up the
package/derivation mapping in ~/.cache/guix and either return it
directly (cache hit) or look up the corresponding <package>, do all the
work, and add an entry in the cache (cache miss).

Challenges include: arranging so (guix records) can deal with record
type inheritance, deciding what to do with grafts, and probably more.

Toggle quote (21 lines)
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
>>
>> > > +;; repeated 'stat' calls. Allow computing the hash of the file in advance,
>> > > +;; to avoid having to send the file to the daemon when it is already interned
>> > > +;; in the store.
>> > > (define-record-type <local-file>
>> > > - (%%local-file file absolute name recursive? select?)
>> > > + (%%local-file file absolute name sha256 recursive? select?)
>> > > local-file?
>> > > (file local-file-file) ;string
>> > > (absolute %local-file-absolute-file-name) ;promise string
>> > > (name local-file-name) ;string
>> > > + (sha256 local-file-sha256) ;sha256 bytevector | #f
>> >
>> > Could we store the result of ‘fixed-output-path’ rather than the SHA256,
>> > while we’re at it?
>
> Embedding the result of ‘fixed-output-path’ in the .go might be problematic
> from a closure size perspective, as that would create additional references in the
> store items of guix.

Yes, I wonder, not sure about that.

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> As it is only <1%, I would prefer trying the ‘package derivation cache’
> first, as it seems to have more potential.

Alright.

Thanks,
Ludo’.
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 4 Oct 2021 18:46
Re: bug#50384: [PATCH] Optimise search-patch (reducing I/O)
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
87h7dwviu7.fsf_-_@gmail.com
Hi,

On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 at 18:17, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

Toggle quote (12 lines)
> Rough design sketch:
>
> The idea I have in mind would be to have <package> be a sub-record-type
> of <proto-package>, where <proto-package> would contain only the
> metadata currently provided by ‘fold-available-packages’ (mainly: name,
> version, module/variable).
>
> <proto-package> would have a gexp compiler that looks up the
> package/derivation mapping in ~/.cache/guix and either return it
> directly (cache hit) or look up the corresponding <package>, do all the
> work, and add an entry in the cache (cache miss).

In this rough design sketch, would this <proto-package> help for
improving the situation of "guix search"? Well, could this cache help
at more place than search-patch?

Cheers,
simon
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 8 Oct 2021 09:41
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)
87sfxc55gi.fsf@gnu.org
Hi zimoun,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:

Toggle quote (18 lines)
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2021 at 18:17, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> Rough design sketch:
>>
>> The idea I have in mind would be to have <package> be a sub-record-type
>> of <proto-package>, where <proto-package> would contain only the
>> metadata currently provided by ‘fold-available-packages’ (mainly: name,
>> version, module/variable).
>>
>> <proto-package> would have a gexp compiler that looks up the
>> package/derivation mapping in ~/.cache/guix and either return it
>> directly (cache hit) or look up the corresponding <package>, do all the
>> work, and add an entry in the cache (cache miss).
>
> In this rough design sketch, would this <proto-package> help for
> improving the situation of "guix search"? Well, could this cache help
> at more place than search-patch?

Yes, that’s what I thought: <proto-package> could be used in
‘fold-available-packages’ & co., so that would kind of unify that.

Ludo’.
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 11 Oct 2021 10:09
CAJ3okZ0Vv9mFbeRV9+b4T-M7ekBGid_VyWEzbMKCMbC-t3HdaA@mail.gmail.com
Hi Ludo,

On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 at 09:41, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> Yes, that’s what I thought: <proto-package> could be used in
> ‘fold-available-packages’ & co., so that would kind of unify that.

Therefore, do we agree that the cache /lib/guix/package.cache should
be extended? Because the v3 adding an extra cache [1] shows
improvements of "guix search" and v4 moving the extra fields to the
regular cache [2] shows the same improvements for searching and in
addition improves this cache generation. The issue with v4 is the
field 'license'. And v6 is an attempt to by-pass that (keep the
regular cache and only read on-the-fly the required information); but
because of this, I guess:

(module-ref (resolve-interface module) symbol)

it is slower!


All the bests,
simon

PS: For cross-reference, discussion originally happened on
?