blast+ is not reproducible

Done

Details

3 participants

Maxim Cournoyer
Ricardo Wurmus
zimoun

Owner: unassigned

Submitted by: Ricardo Wurmus

Severity: normal

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 30 Jun 2020 18:42

Recipients:(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)

Message-ID:87sgecmroj.fsf@elephly.net

This should be rather easy to fix:

Toggle snippet (26 lines)diff -r /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include-check
diff -r /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
4,13c4,13
< #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    1770246234u
< #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    2685550394u
< #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    1952513968u
< #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    4081691487u
< #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    1126642990u
< #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    2363626105u
< #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    444644742u
< #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    2799580837u
< #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    216161479u
< #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    992434062u
---
> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    2851596927u
> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    4039058594u
> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    3204116600u
> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    4270143185u
> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    1366873742u
> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    703144487u
> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    2507785646u
> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    3995716134u
> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    907933519u
> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    1149060107u

Ricardo

Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 29 Sep 2022 02:35

Recipients:(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)(address . 42141-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87k05now4i.fsf@gmail.com

Hi,

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

Toggle quote (27 lines)> This should be rather easy to fix:
>
> diff -r /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include-check
> diff -r /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
> 4,13c4,13
> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    1770246234u
> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    2685550394u
> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    1952513968u
> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    4081691487u
> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    1126642990u
> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    2363626105u
> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    444644742u
> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    2799580837u
> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    216161479u
> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    992434062u
> ---
>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    2851596927u
>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    4039058594u
>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    3204116600u
>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    4270143185u
>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    1366873742u
>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    703144487u
>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    2507785646u
>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    3995716134u
>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    907933519u
>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    1149060107u

Not anymore, according to:

Toggle snippet (8 lines)

$ guix challenge blast+

1 store items were analyzed:

- 1 (100.0%) were identical

- 0 (0.0%) differed

- 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive

That's for blast+ 2.11.0.

Closing!

Maxim

Closed

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 29 Sep 2022 11:24

Recipients:(name . Maxim Cournoyer)(address . maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com)

Message-ID:87h70qsf9m.fsf@elephly.net

reopen 42141

thanks

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

Toggle quote (44 lines)> Hi,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>
>> This should be rather easy to fix:
>>
>> diff -r
>> /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include
>> /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include-check
>> diff -r
>> /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
>> /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
>> 4,13c4,13
>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    1770246234u
>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    2685550394u
>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    1952513968u
>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    4081691487u
>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    1126642990u
>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    2363626105u
>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    444644742u
>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    2799580837u
>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    216161479u
>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    992434062u
>> ---
>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    2851596927u
>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    4039058594u
>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    3204116600u
>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    4270143185u
>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    1366873742u
>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    703144487u
>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    2507785646u
>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    3995716134u
>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    907933519u
>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    1149060107u
>
> Not anymore, according to:
>
> $ guix challenge blast+
>
> 1 store items were analyzed:
>   - 1 (100.0%) were identical
>   - 0 (0.0%) differed
>   - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive

This is still a problem:

Toggle snippet (42 lines)$ diff -ru /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include-check
diff -ru /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h
--- /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h	1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 +0100
+++ /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h	1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 +0100
@@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@
 
 /* Build signature: compiler-name '_' compiler-version '-' configuration '--'
    platform-name '-' hostname */
-#define NCBI_SIGNATURE "GCC_1030-DebugMTDLL64--x86_64-unknown-linux5.15.10-gnu2.33-localhost"
+#define NCBI_SIGNATURE "GCC_1030-DebugMTDLL64--x86_64-unknown-linux5.15.59-gnu2.33-localhost"
 
 /* Define to 1 if SQLColAttribute's last argument is an SQLLEN * */
 #define NCBI_SQLCOLATTRIBUTE_SQLLEN 1
diff -ru /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
--- /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h	1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 +0100
+++ /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h	1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 +0100
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_TYPE Uint4
 #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_MIN  0
 #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_MAX  0xffffffffu
-#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    3249030781u
-#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    3573796697u
-#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    2130009325u
-#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    4284761029u
-#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    3467737853u
-#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    3267844710u
-#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    4107058373u
-#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    166436459u
-#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    960927418u
-#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    3839848519u
+#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    2845495105u
+#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    2158634051u
+#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    4072202242u
+#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    902228395u
+#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    1353323915u
+#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    574823513u
+#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    4119501261u
+#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    2477640938u
+#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    2776595395u
+#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    270550684u

Ricardo

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 29 Sep 2022 11:32

Recipients:(name . Maxim Cournoyer)(address . maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com)(address . 42141@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87czbesewx.fsf@elephly.net

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

Toggle quote (92 lines)> reopen 42141
> thanks
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>
>>> This should be rather easy to fix:
>>>
>>> diff -r
>>> /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include
>>> /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include-check
>>> diff -r
>>> /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
>>> /gnu/store/3y97kfanv9ynxnahyykixchlbpbyvjmm-blast+-2.10.1-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
>>> 4,13c4,13
>>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    1770246234u
>>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    2685550394u
>>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    1952513968u
>>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    4081691487u
>>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    1126642990u
>>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    2363626105u
>>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    444644742u
>>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    2799580837u
>>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    216161479u
>>> < #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    992434062u
>>> ---
>>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    2851596927u
>>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    4039058594u
>>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    3204116600u
>>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    4270143185u
>>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    1366873742u
>>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    703144487u
>>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    2507785646u
>>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    3995716134u
>>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    907933519u
>>>> #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    1149060107u
>>
>> Not anymore, according to:
>>
>> $ guix challenge blast+
>>
>> 1 store items were analyzed:
>>   - 1 (100.0%) were identical
>>   - 0 (0.0%) differed
>>   - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
>
> This is still a problem:
>
> $ diff -ru /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include-check
> diff -ru /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h
> --- /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h	1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 +0100
> +++ /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h	1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1095,7 +1095,7 @@
>  
>  /* Build signature: compiler-name '_' compiler-version '-' configuration '--'
>     platform-name '-' hostname */
> -#define NCBI_SIGNATURE "GCC_1030-DebugMTDLL64--x86_64-unknown-linux5.15.10-gnu2.33-localhost"
> +#define NCBI_SIGNATURE "GCC_1030-DebugMTDLL64--x86_64-unknown-linux5.15.59-gnu2.33-localhost"
>  
>  /* Define to 1 if SQLColAttribute's last argument is an SQLLEN * */
>  #define NCBI_SQLCOLATTRIBUTE_SQLLEN 1
> diff -ru /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
> --- /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h	1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 +0100
> +++ /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include-check/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h	1970-01-01 01:00:01.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
>  #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_TYPE Uint4
>  #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_MIN  0
>  #define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_MAX  0xffffffffu
> -#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    3249030781u
> -#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    3573796697u
> -#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    2130009325u
> -#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    4284761029u
> -#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    3467737853u
> -#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    3267844710u
> -#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    4107058373u
> -#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    166436459u
> -#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    960927418u
> -#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    3839848519u
> +#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_0    2845495105u
> +#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_1    2158634051u
> +#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_2    4072202242u
> +#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_3    902228395u
> +#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_4    1353323915u
> +#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_5    574823513u
> +#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_6    4119501261u
> +#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_7    2477640938u
> +#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_8    2776595395u
> +#define NCBI_RANDOM_VALUE_9    270550684u

These values are generated here:

ncbi-blast-2.11.0+-src/c++/scripts/common/impl/define_random_macros.sh

I don’t know if we can just define them to fixed values; it should be

fine.

Debian also has a patch for other problems including the NCBI_SIGNATURE

value:

https://sources.debian.org/data/main/n/ncbi-blast%2B/2.12.0%2Bds-3/debian/patches/reprobuild

Ricardo

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 30 Sep 2022 00:04

Recipients:(name . Maxim Cournoyer)(address . maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com)(address . 42141-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87zgehrg5w.fsf@elephly.net

Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337.

Ricardo

Closed

Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 30 Sep 2022 05:09

Recipients:(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)(address . 42141-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87ill5mucy.fsf@gmail.com

Hello,

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

Toggle quote (2 lines)

> Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337.

Yay! Thank you! And for my curiosity, how did I get the two build

farms to agree on an identical build, as reported in 'guix challenge'?

That is odd.

Maxim

Closed

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 30 Sep 2022 12:04

Recipients:(name . Maxim Cournoyer)(address . maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com)(address . 42141-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87v8p5qiqx.fsf@elephly.net

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

Toggle quote (9 lines)

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

>> Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337.

> Yay! Thank you! And for my curiosity, how did I get the two build

> farms to agree on an identical build, as reported in 'guix challenge'?

> That is odd.

I don’t know. I also got the same result from “guix challenge”, but I

hadn’t built it locally. It was only when I built it on my machine (and

with “--check”) that I confirmed that the issue still existed.

Any way of making “guix challenge” tell us more about what it actually

compared?

Ricardo

Closed

zimoun wrote on 30 Sep 2022 16:01

Recipients:(address . 42141-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87v8p50xmp.fsf@gmail.com

Hi,

On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 at 23:09, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:

Toggle quote (9 lines)

> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

>> Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337.

> Yay! Thank you! And for my curiosity, how did I get the two build

> farms to agree on an identical build, as reported in 'guix challenge'?

> That is odd.

Because blast+ is multi-outputs and ’out’ is fine contrary to ’include’:

Toggle snippet (16 lines)

$ guix challenge blast+:include

/gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include contents differ:

local hash: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x

https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0cakizfsqb1lla62cmwnng1h9gvqgf3lyjk0k7lkiaisj713mpzx

differing files:

/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h

/include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h

1 store items were analyzed:

- 0 (0.0%) were identical

- 1 (100.0%) differed

- 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive

Cheers,

simon

Closed

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 30 Sep 2022 16:38

Recipients:(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)

Message-ID:87mtahq65i.fsf@elephly.net

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

Toggle quote (28 lines)> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 at 23:09, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>
>>> Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337.
>>
>> Yay!  Thank you!  And for my curiosity, how did I get the two build
>> farms to agree on an identical build, as reported in 'guix challenge'?
>>
>> That is odd.
>
> Because blast+ is multi-outputs and ’out’ is fine contrary to ’include’:
>
> $ guix challenge blast+:include
> /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include contents differ:
>   local hash: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x
>   https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0cakizfsqb1lla62cmwnng1h9gvqgf3lyjk0k7lkiaisj713mpzx
>   differing files:
>     /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
>     /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h
>
> 1 store items were analyzed:
>   - 0 (0.0%) were identical
>   - 1 (100.0%) differed
>   - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive

Ah, thanks for explaining!

Ricardo

Closed

Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 30 Sep 2022 23:20

Recipients:(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)

Message-ID:87a66glft2.fsf@gmail.com

Hi,

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:

Toggle quote (32 lines)> zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 at 23:09, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337.
>>>
>>> Yay!  Thank you!  And for my curiosity, how did I get the two build
>>> farms to agree on an identical build, as reported in 'guix challenge'?
>>>
>>> That is odd.
>>
>> Because blast+ is multi-outputs and ’out’ is fine contrary to ’include’:
>>
>> $ guix challenge blast+:include
>> /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include contents differ:
>>   local hash: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x
>>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x
>>   https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0cakizfsqb1lla62cmwnng1h9gvqgf3lyjk0k7lkiaisj713mpzx
>>   differing files:
>>     /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h
>>     /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h
>>
>> 1 store items were analyzed:
>>   - 0 (0.0%) were identical
>>   - 1 (100.0%) differed
>>   - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive
>
> Ah, thanks for explaining!

Ah! Shouldn't the default be to compare all outputs? It seems that'd

be less surprising and useful.

What do you think?

Maxim

Closed

Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 42141@debbugs.gnu.org

is:open	open issues
is:done	closed issues
submitter:<who>	search issue submitter
author:<who>	search by message author
date:yesterday..now	search by issue date
mdate:3m..2d	search by message date