Hi, Ricardo Wurmus writes: > zimoun writes: > >> Hi, >> >> On Thu, 29 Sep 2022 at 23:09, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: >>> Ricardo Wurmus writes: >>> >>>> Fixed with commit 1ee2d117d8fa9e2e0d4ec46cc5555497bb5e6337. >>> >>> Yay! Thank you! And for my curiosity, how did I get the two build >>> farms to agree on an identical build, as reported in 'guix challenge'? >>> >>> That is odd. >> >> Because blast+ is multi-outputs and ’out’ is fine contrary to ’include’: >> >> $ guix challenge blast+:include >> /gnu/store/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast+-2.11.0-include contents differ: >> local hash: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x >> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0q4nssknlmc54m8abndn9bhrlwm4m28lkb75i1wnwr0ghbalj02x >> https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/0kbsdr61qpj0vkc6s8g2kbp4dq936n0p-blast%2B-2.11.0-include: 0cakizfsqb1lla62cmwnng1h9gvqgf3lyjk0k7lkiaisj713mpzx >> differing files: >> /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbi_random_macro.h >> /include/ncbi-tools++/ncbi-tools++/ncbiconf_unix.h >> >> 1 store items were analyzed: >> - 0 (0.0%) were identical >> - 1 (100.0%) differed >> - 0 (0.0%) were inconclusive > > Ah, thanks for explaining! Ah! Shouldn't the default be to compare all outputs? It seems that'd be less surprising and useful. What do you think? -- Maxim