guile-sdl-0.5.2 fails to install on i686

Done

Details

5 participants

Thiago Jung Bauermann
Efraim Flashner
Luis Felipe López Acevedo
Ludovic Courtès
Ricardo Wurmus

Owner: unassigned

Submitted by: Luis Felipe López Acevedo

Severity: minor

Debbugs page

Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote 9 years ago

Recipients:(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)

Message-ID:1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org

Hi,

I'm using Guix 0.9.0 on Debian 8 (i686). Running the following command:

$ guix package -i guile-sdl

Results in the following error:

Toggle snippet (26 lines)======================================
1 of 9 tests failed
(2 tests were not run)
Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org
======================================
Makefile:352: recipe for target 'check-TESTS' failed
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/tmp/nix-build-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv-0/guile-sdl-0.5.2/test'
Makefile:475: recipe for target 'check-am' failed
make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/tmp/nix-build-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv-0/guile-sdl-0.5.2/test'
Makefile:415: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failed
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
phase `check' failed after 24.3 seconds
builder for
`/gnu/store/zq1lxrsqsn3xkzcg0z4s88j5pgjndijm-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv' failed
with exit code 1
cannot build derivation
`/gnu/store/0wlwdvdj7xba6kljfwxxsg4ch7ckdrgs-profile.drv': 1
dependencies couldn't be built
guix package: error: build failed: build of
`/gnu/store/0wlwdvdj7xba6kljfwxxsg4ch7ckdrgs-profile.drv' failed

Hydra also says the package is failing to build:

http://hydra.gnu.org/build/814627#tabs-summary

Thanks,

Luis Felipe López Acevedo

http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/

Ludovic Courtès wrote 9 years ago

Guile-SDL 0.5.2 test failure i686-linux-gnu

Recipients:(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:874mg5m3dk.fsf@gnu.org

Hello!

On GNU Guix, we’re seeing one 100% reproducible test failure on

i686-linux-gnu:

Toggle snippet (22 lines)/gnu/store/isxqjfaglyfsbcv75y8qbqbph8v28ykr-bash-4.3.39/bin/bash: line 5:   838 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tst
FAIL: gfx.scm
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/
PASS: fading.scm
======================================
1 of 9 tests failed
(2 tests were not run)
Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org
======================================

(Note that we run tests with the Xvfb server. See

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/sdl.scm#n303.)

The backtrace is mildly informative:

Toggle snippet (12 lines)

$ gdb $(type -P guile) core

GNU gdb (GDB) 7.10

[...]

(gdb) bt

#0 0xf4d98130 in SDL_imageFilterSubByteMMX (Src1=0x5d <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x5d>, Dest=0xffb429c8 "]",

SrcLength=4107944472, C=152 '\230') at SDL_imageFilter.c:2185

#1 0x09cfd470 in ?? ()

Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

That SrcLength is so high suggests it might be an integer overflow.

This is with SDL_image 1.2.12.

To reproduce with Guix, run:

guix build guile-sdl -s i686-linux --keep-failed

Thanks,

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès wrote 9 years ago

Recipients:(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87lh6zl2qn.fsf@gnu.org

Hi!

I’m not seeing the message below at

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile-sdl/, so resending it.

(This is from http://bugs.gnu.org/22020.)

Ludo’.

Attachment: file

Ludovic Courtès wrote 9 years ago

control message for bug #22020

Recipients:(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87oa7j2xb1.fsf@gnu.org

severity 22020 minor

Ricardo Wurmus wrote 5 years ago

guile-sdl-0.5.2 fails to install on i686

Recipients:(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)

Message-ID:87k11eiepr.fsf@elephly.net

Guile SDL 0.5.2 still fails on i686:

Toggle snippet (22 lines)The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
/gnu/store/v1g7f3p4f0851mywrla8qmr9hb8jgfjr-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash: line 5:  6964 Segmentation fault      HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tst
FAIL: gfx.scm
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
PASS: fading.scm
======================================
1 of 8 tests failed
(3 tests were not run)
Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org
======================================

I’m putting bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org in Cc, hoping that this time our

message can be delivered.

If this doesn’t work we should mark this package unsupported for

i686-linux.

Ricardo

Efraim Flashner wrote 5 years ago

Recipients:(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)

Message-ID:20200517120548.GD31833@E5400

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:

Toggle quote (35 lines)> Guile SDL 0.5.2 still fails on i686:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
> /gnu/store/v1g7f3p4f0851mywrla8qmr9hb8jgfjr-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash: line 5:  6964 Segmentation fault      HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tst
> FAIL: gfx.scm
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
> PASS: fading.scm
> ======================================
> 1 of 8 tests failed
> (3 tests were not run)
> Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org
> ======================================
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> I’m putting bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org in Cc, hoping that this time our
> message can be delivered.
> 
> If this doesn’t work we should mark this package unsupported for
> i686-linux.
> 
> -- 
> Ricardo
> 

I also took a look at this package last week and I saw it still failed
the tests on i686-linux. I would like to note, however, that it does
build and pass the test suite on powerpc-linux.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote 3 years ago

[PATCH] gnu: guile-sdl: Update to 0.6.1

Recipients:(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)(name . Thiago Jung Bauermann)(address . bauermann@kolabnow.com)

Message-ID:20220619225911.105125-1-bauermann@kolabnow.com

This version's testsuite passes on i686-linux.

Fixes https://issues.guix.gnu.org/22020.

* gnu/packages/sdl.scm (guile-sdl): Update to 0.6.1.

---

Hello,

I was looking at bug 22020 (guile-sdl-0.5.2 fails to install on i686) and

noticed that upgrading guile-sdl to the latest version fixes the problem so

this is what this patch does.

Note that the diff between 0.5.3 and 0.6.1 has almost 24k lines so I didn't

even try skimming it.

I did verify the tarball's signature using the maintainer's (expired) public

key that I downloaded from Savannah¹:

$ gpg --verify guile-sdl-0.6.1.tar.lz.sig

gpg: assuming signed data in 'guile-sdl-0.6.1.tar.lz'

gpg: Signature made Sun Feb 20 21:16:09 2022 -03

gpg: using DSA key 748EA0E81CB8A7489BFA6CE4670322244C807502

gpg: Good signature from "Thien-Thi Nguyen (software signing) <ttn@gnuvola.org>" [expired]

gpg: aka "Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org>" [expired]

gpg: aka "Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnu.org>" [expired]

gpg: Note: This key has expired!

Primary key fingerprint: 748E A0E8 1CB8 A748 9BFA 6CE4 6703 2224 4C80 7502

I'll send a message to the guile-sdl mailing list suggesting them to publish

a new key.

Thanks,

Thiago

¹ https://savannah.gnu.org/users/ttn

gnu/packages/sdl.scm | 4 ++--

1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (24 lines)diff --git a/gnu/packages/sdl.scm b/gnu/packages/sdl.scm
index 4c38e2f05507..49bc09312a13 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/sdl.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/sdl.scm
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ (define-public sdl2-ttf
 (define-public guile-sdl
   (package
     (name "guile-sdl")
-    (version "0.5.3")
+    (version "0.6.1")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
               (uri
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ (define-public guile-sdl
                               version ".tar.lz"))
               (sha256
                (base32
-                "040gyk3n3yp8i30ngdg97n3083g8b6laky2nlh10jqcyjdd550d6"))))
+                "1q985nd3birr5pny74915x098fisa6llas3ijgf1b4gdz5717nzz"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (native-inputs
      `(("lzip" ,lzip)

base-commit: 73761d8049f483e6685c2c736872d0366e03238a

Efraim Flashner wrote 2 years ago

Recipients:(name . Thiago Jung Bauermann)(address . bauermann@kolabnow.com)(address . 22020-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:YxCuq8Vg8OyxlbsS@3900XT

It's been a while since you submitted this patch, but it's applied now.
Thanks!

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Closed

Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote 2 years ago

Recipients:(name . Efraim Flashner)(address . efraim@flashner.co.il)(address . 22020-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87zgfh88pb.fsf@kolabnow.com

Hello Efraim,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

Toggle quote (4 lines)

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]

> It's been a while since you submitted this patch, but it's applied now.

> Thanks!

I had forgotten about this patch. Thank you!

Thanks

Thiago

Closed

Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 22020@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it

mumi current 22020

Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)

mumi am -- -s

Or, compose a reply to this issue

mumi compose

Or, send patches to this issue

mumi send-email *.patch

You may also tag this issue. See list of standard tags. For example, to set the confirmed and easy tags

mumi command -t +confirmed -t +easy

Or, remove the moreinfo tag and set the help tag

mumi command -t -moreinfo -t +help

is:open	open issues
is:done	closed issues
submitter:<who>	search issue submitter
author:<who>	search by message author
date:yesterday..now	search by issue date
mdate:3m..2d	search by message date