guile-sdl-0.5.2 fails to install on i686

Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote on 26 Nov 2015 23:31

Recipients:(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)

Message-ID:1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org

Hi,

I'm using Guix 0.9.0 on Debian 8 (i686). Running the following command:

$ guix package -i guile-sdl

Results in the following error:

Toggle snippet (26 lines)======================================
1 of 9 tests failed
(2 tests were not run)
Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org
======================================
Makefile:352: recipe for target 'check-TESTS' failed
make[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
'/tmp/nix-build-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv-0/guile-sdl-0.5.2/test'
Makefile:475: recipe for target 'check-am' failed
make[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory
'/tmp/nix-build-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv-0/guile-sdl-0.5.2/test'
Makefile:415: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failed
make: *** [check-recursive] Error 1
phase `check' failed after 24.3 seconds
builder for
`/gnu/store/zq1lxrsqsn3xkzcg0z4s88j5pgjndijm-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv' failed
with exit code 1
cannot build derivation
`/gnu/store/0wlwdvdj7xba6kljfwxxsg4ch7ckdrgs-profile.drv': 1
dependencies couldn't be built
guix package: error: build failed: build of
`/gnu/store/0wlwdvdj7xba6kljfwxxsg4ch7ckdrgs-profile.drv' failed

Hydra also says the package is failing to build:

http://hydra.gnu.org/build/814627#tabs-summary

Thanks,

Luis Felipe López Acevedo

http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 29 Nov 2015 12:49

Guile-SDL 0.5.2 test failure i686-linux-gnu

Recipients:(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:874mg5m3dk.fsf@gnu.org

Hello!

On GNU Guix, we’re seeing one 100% reproducible test failure on

i686-linux-gnu:

Toggle snippet (22 lines)/gnu/store/isxqjfaglyfsbcv75y8qbqbph8v28ykr-bash-4.3.39/bin/bash: line 5:   838 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tst
FAIL: gfx.scm
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/
PASS: fading.scm
======================================
1 of 9 tests failed
(2 tests were not run)
Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org
======================================

(Note that we run tests with the Xvfb server. See

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/sdl.scm#n303.)

The backtrace is mildly informative:

Toggle snippet (12 lines)

$ gdb $(type -P guile) core

GNU gdb (GDB) 7.10

[...]

(gdb) bt

#0 0xf4d98130 in SDL_imageFilterSubByteMMX (Src1=0x5d <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x5d>, Dest=0xffb429c8 "]",

SrcLength=4107944472, C=152 '\230') at SDL_imageFilter.c:2185

#1 0x09cfd470 in ?? ()

Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

That SrcLength is so high suggests it might be an integer overflow.

This is with SDL_image 1.2.12.

To reproduce with Guix, run:

guix build guile-sdl -s i686-linux --keep-failed

Thanks,

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 5 Feb 2016 14:13

Recipients:(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87lh6zl2qn.fsf@gnu.org

Hi!

I’m not seeing the message below at

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile-sdl/, so resending it.

(This is from http://bugs.gnu.org/22020.)

Ludo’.

X-From-Line: unknown Fri Feb 05 08:09:19 2016
X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org
Subject: bug#22020: Guile-SDL 0.5.2 test failure i686-linux-gnu
Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org
Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:51:02 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22020.B22020.144879782929926@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org
X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22020
X-GNU-PR-Package: guix
X-GNU-PR-Keywords: 
To: bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org, 22020@debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: 22020@debbugs.gnu.org
Received: via spool by 22020-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22020.144879782929926
          (code B ref 22020); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:51:02 +0000
Received: (at 22020) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2015 11:50:29 +0000
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58806 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)
	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1a30Uv-0007mb-3U
	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:29 -0500
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49366)
 by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a30UZ-0007m6-Uc
 for 22020@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:26 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a30UU-0007B4-HE
 for 22020@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:07 -0500
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
 autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51956)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
 id 1a30UU-0007Aw-Er; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:02 -0500
Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:51244 helo=pluto)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128)
 (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
 id 1a30UT-0006iv-J6; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:02 -0500
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
References: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:49:59 +0100
In-Reply-To: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe
 =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?=
 Acevedo"'s message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:31:23 -0500")
Message-ID: <874mg5m3dk.fsf@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address
 (bad octet value).
X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/
List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit, 
 <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello!

On GNU Guix, we=E2=80=99re seeing one 100% reproducible test failure on
i686-linux-gnu:

Toggle snippet (26 lines)/gnu/store/isxqjfaglyfsbcv75y8qbqbph8v28ykr-bash-4.3.39/bin/bash: line 5:  =
 838 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) HAVE_TTF=3D1 HAVE_MIXER=3D0 sh z=
ow ${dir}$tst
FAIL: gfx.scm
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/
_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/
PASS: fading.scm
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
1 of 9 tests failed
(2 tests were not run)
Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

(Note that we run tests with the Xvfb server. See

http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/sdl.scm#n303.)

The backtrace is mildly informative:

Toggle snippet (13 lines)

$ gdb $(type -P guile) core

GNU gdb (GDB) 7.10

[...]

(gdb) bt

#0 0xf4d98130 in SDL_imageFilterSubByteMMX (Src1=3D0x5d <error: Cannot acc=

ess memory at address 0x5d>, Dest=3D0xffb429c8 "]",=20

SrcLength=3D4107944472, C=3D152 '\230') at SDL_imageFilter.c:2185

#1 0x09cfd470 in ?? ()

Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

That SrcLength is so high suggests it might be an integer overflow.

This is with SDL_image 1.2.12.

To reproduce with Guix, run:

guix build guile-sdl -s i686-linux --keep-failed

Thanks,

Ludo=E2=80=99.

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 2 Jun 2016 21:41

control message for bug #22020

Recipients:(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87oa7j2xb1.fsf@gnu.org

severity 22020 minor

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 14 May 2020 19:55

guile-sdl-0.5.2 fails to install on i686

Recipients:(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)

Message-ID:87k11eiepr.fsf@elephly.net

Guile SDL 0.5.2 still fails on i686:

Toggle snippet (22 lines)The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
/gnu/store/v1g7f3p4f0851mywrla8qmr9hb8jgfjr-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash: line 5:  6964 Segmentation fault      HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tst
FAIL: gfx.scm
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
PASS: fading.scm
======================================
1 of 8 tests failed
(3 tests were not run)
Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org
======================================

I’m putting bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org in Cc, hoping that this time our

message can be delivered.

If this doesn’t work we should mark this package unsupported for

i686-linux.

Ricardo

Efraim Flashner wrote on 17 May 2020 14:05

Recipients:(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)

Message-ID:20200517120548.GD31833@E5400

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:

Toggle quote (35 lines)> Guile SDL 0.5.2 still fails on i686:
> 
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
> /gnu/store/v1g7f3p4f0851mywrla8qmr9hb8jgfjr-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash: line 5:  6964 Segmentation fault      HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tst
> FAIL: gfx.scm
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:
> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen
> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server
> PASS: fading.scm
> ======================================
> 1 of 8 tests failed
> (3 tests were not run)
> Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org
> ======================================
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> 
> I’m putting bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org in Cc, hoping that this time our
> message can be delivered.
> 
> If this doesn’t work we should mark this package unsupported for
> i686-linux.
> 
> -- 
> Ricardo
> 

I also took a look at this package last week and I saw it still failed
the tests on i686-linux. I would like to note, however, that it does
build and pass the test suite on powerpc-linux.

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote on 20 Jun 00:59 +0200

[PATCH] gnu: guile-sdl: Update to 0.6.1

Recipients:(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)(name . Thiago Jung Bauermann)(address . bauermann@kolabnow.com)

Message-ID:20220619225911.105125-1-bauermann@kolabnow.com

This version's testsuite passes on i686-linux.

Fixes https://issues.guix.gnu.org/22020.

* gnu/packages/sdl.scm (guile-sdl): Update to 0.6.1.

---

Hello,

I was looking at bug 22020 (guile-sdl-0.5.2 fails to install on i686) and

noticed that upgrading guile-sdl to the latest version fixes the problem so

this is what this patch does.

Note that the diff between 0.5.3 and 0.6.1 has almost 24k lines so I didn't

even try skimming it.

I did verify the tarball's signature using the maintainer's (expired) public

key that I downloaded from Savannah¹:

$ gpg --verify guile-sdl-0.6.1.tar.lz.sig

gpg: assuming signed data in 'guile-sdl-0.6.1.tar.lz'

gpg: Signature made Sun Feb 20 21:16:09 2022 -03

gpg: using DSA key 748EA0E81CB8A7489BFA6CE4670322244C807502

gpg: Good signature from "Thien-Thi Nguyen (software signing) <ttn@gnuvola.org>" [expired]

gpg: aka "Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org>" [expired]

gpg: aka "Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnu.org>" [expired]

gpg: Note: This key has expired!

Primary key fingerprint: 748E A0E8 1CB8 A748 9BFA 6CE4 6703 2224 4C80 7502

I'll send a message to the guile-sdl mailing list suggesting them to publish

a new key.

Thanks,

Thiago

¹ https://savannah.gnu.org/users/ttn

gnu/packages/sdl.scm | 4 ++--

1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (24 lines)diff --git a/gnu/packages/sdl.scm b/gnu/packages/sdl.scm
index 4c38e2f05507..49bc09312a13 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/sdl.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/sdl.scm
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ (define-public sdl2-ttf
 (define-public guile-sdl
   (package
     (name "guile-sdl")
-    (version "0.5.3")
+    (version "0.6.1")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
               (uri
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ (define-public guile-sdl
                               version ".tar.lz"))
               (sha256
                (base32
-                "040gyk3n3yp8i30ngdg97n3083g8b6laky2nlh10jqcyjdd550d6"))))
+                "1q985nd3birr5pny74915x098fisa6llas3ijgf1b4gdz5717nzz"))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (native-inputs
      `(("lzip" ,lzip)

base-commit: 73761d8049f483e6685c2c736872d0366e03238a

Efraim Flashner wrote on 1 Sep 15:07 +0200

Recipients:(name . Thiago Jung Bauermann)(address . bauermann@kolabnow.com)(address . 22020-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:YxCuq8Vg8OyxlbsS@3900XT

It's been a while since you submitted this patch, but it's applied now.
Thanks!

-- 
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Closed

Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote on 3 Sep 04:58 +0200

Recipients:(name . Efraim Flashner)(address . efraim@flashner.co.il)(address . 22020-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87zgfh88pb.fsf@kolabnow.com

Hello Efraim,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> writes:

Toggle quote (4 lines)

> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]

> It's been a while since you submitted this patch, but it's applied now.

> Thanks!

I had forgotten about this patch. Thank you!

Thanks

Thiago

Closed

Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send email to 22020@debbugs.gnu.org

is:open	open issues
is:done	closed issues
submitter:<who>	search issue submitter
author:<who>	search by message author
date:yesterday..now	search by issue date
mdate:3m..2d	search by message date