guile-sdl-0.5.2 fails to install on i686

Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote on 26 Nov 2015 23:31

Recipients:(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)

Message-ID:1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org

Hi,
I'm using Guix 0.9.0 on Debian 8 (i686). Running the following command:
$ guix package -i guile-sdl
Results in the following error:

Toggle snippet (26 lines)======================================1 of 9 tests failed(2 tests were not run)Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org======================================Makefile:352: recipe for target 'check-TESTS' failedmake[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1make[2]: Leaving directory'/tmp/nix-build-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv-0/guile-sdl-0.5.2/test'Makefile:475: recipe for target 'check-am' failedmake[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2make[1]: Leaving directory'/tmp/nix-build-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv-0/guile-sdl-0.5.2/test'Makefile:415: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failedmake: *** [check-recursive] Error 1phase `check' failed after 24.3 secondsbuilder for`/gnu/store/zq1lxrsqsn3xkzcg0z4s88j5pgjndijm-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv' failedwith exit code 1cannot build derivation`/gnu/store/0wlwdvdj7xba6kljfwxxsg4ch7ckdrgs-profile.drv': 1dependencies couldn't be builtguix package: error: build failed: build of`/gnu/store/0wlwdvdj7xba6kljfwxxsg4ch7ckdrgs-profile.drv' failed

Hydra also says the package is failing to build:
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/814627#tabs-summary

Thanks,
-- Luis Felipe López Acevedohttp://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 29 Nov 2015 12:49

Guile-SDL 0.5.2 test failure i686-linux-gnu

Recipients:(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:874mg5m3dk.fsf@gnu.org

Hello!
On GNU Guix, we’re seeing one 100% reproducible test failure oni686-linux-gnu:

Toggle snippet (22 lines)/gnu/store/isxqjfaglyfsbcv75y8qbqbph8v28ykr-bash-4.3.39/bin/bash: line 5:   838 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tstFAIL: gfx.scm_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/PASS: fading.scm======================================1 of 9 tests failed(2 tests were not run)Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org======================================

(Note that we run tests with the Xvfb server. Seehttp://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/sdl.scm#n303.)
The backtrace is mildly informative:

Toggle snippet (12 lines)

$ gdb $(type -P guile) coreGNU gdb (GDB) 7.10
[...]
(gdb) bt#0 0xf4d98130 in SDL_imageFilterSubByteMMX (Src1=0x5d <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x5d>, Dest=0xffb429c8 "]", SrcLength=4107944472, C=152 '\230') at SDL_imageFilter.c:2185#1 0x09cfd470 in ?? ()Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

That SrcLength is so high suggests it might be an integer overflow.
This is with SDL_image 1.2.12.
To reproduce with Guix, run:
guix build guile-sdl -s i686-linux --keep-failed
Thanks,Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 5 Feb 2016 14:13

Recipients:(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87lh6zl2qn.fsf@gnu.org

Hi!
I’m not seeing the message below athttp://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile-sdl/, so resending it.(This is from http://bugs.gnu.org/22020.)
Ludo’.

X-From-Line: unknown Fri Feb 05 08:09:19 2016X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.orgSubject: bug#22020: Guile-SDL 0.5.2 test failure i686-linux-gnuResent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.orgResent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:51:02 +0000Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22020.B22020.144879782929926@debbugs.gnu.org>Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.orgX-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22020X-GNU-PR-Package: guixX-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org, 22020@debbugs.gnu.orgCc: 22020@debbugs.gnu.orgReceived: via spool by 22020-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22020.144879782929926          (code B ref 22020); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:51:02 +0000Received: (at 22020) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2015 11:50:29 +0000Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58806 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)	id 1a30Uv-0007mb-3U	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:29 -0500Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a30UZ-0007m6-Uc for 22020@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:26 -0500Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a30UU-0007B4-HE for 22020@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:07 -0500X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.orgX-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a30UU-0007Aw-Er; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:02 -0500Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:51244 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a30UT-0006iv-J6; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:02 -0500From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)References: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org>Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:49:59 +0100In-Reply-To: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:31:23 -0500")Message-ID: <874mg5m3dk.fsf@gnu.org>User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value).X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::eX-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.orgX-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15Precedence: listList-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>List-Unsubscribe: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit,  <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>List-Archive: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>List-Subscribe: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit,  <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.orgSender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello!
On GNU Guix, we=E2=80=99re seeing one 100% reproducible test failure oni686-linux-gnu:

Toggle snippet (26 lines)/gnu/store/isxqjfaglyfsbcv75y8qbqbph8v28ykr-bash-4.3.39/bin/bash: line 5:  = 838 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) HAVE_TTF=3D1 HAVE_MIXER=3D0 sh z=ow ${dir}$tstFAIL: gfx.scm_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/PASS: fading.scm=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D==3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D1 of 9 tests failed(2 tests were not run)Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D==3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

(Note that we run tests with the Xvfb server. Seehttp://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/sdl.scm#n303.)
The backtrace is mildly informative:

Toggle snippet (13 lines)

$ gdb $(type -P guile) coreGNU gdb (GDB) 7.10
[...]
(gdb) bt#0 0xf4d98130 in SDL_imageFilterSubByteMMX (Src1=3D0x5d <error: Cannot acc=ess memory at address 0x5d>, Dest=3D0xffb429c8 "]",=20 SrcLength=3D4107944472, C=3D152 '\230') at SDL_imageFilter.c:2185#1 0x09cfd470 in ?? ()Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

That SrcLength is so high suggests it might be an integer overflow.
This is with SDL_image 1.2.12.
To reproduce with Guix, run:
guix build guile-sdl -s i686-linux --keep-failed
Thanks,Ludo=E2=80=99.

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 2 Jun 2016 21:41

control message for bug #22020

Recipients:(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87oa7j2xb1.fsf@gnu.org

severity 22020 minor

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 14 May 2020 19:55

guile-sdl-0.5.2 fails to install on i686

Recipients:(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)

Message-ID:87k11eiepr.fsf@elephly.net

Guile SDL 0.5.2 still fails on i686:

Toggle snippet (22 lines)The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreenErrors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X serverThe XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreenErrors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server/gnu/store/v1g7f3p4f0851mywrla8qmr9hb8jgfjr-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash: line 5:  6964 Segmentation fault      HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tstFAIL: gfx.scmThe XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreenErrors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X serverThe XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreenErrors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X serverPASS: fading.scm======================================1 of 8 tests failed(3 tests were not run)Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org======================================

I’m putting bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org in Cc, hoping that this time ourmessage can be delivered.
If this doesn’t work we should mark this package unsupported fori686-linux.
-- Ricardo

Efraim Flashner wrote on 17 May 2020 14:05

Recipients:(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)

Message-ID:20200517120548.GD31833@E5400

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:

Toggle quote (35 lines)> Guile SDL 0.5.2 still fails on i686:> > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server> /gnu/store/v1g7f3p4f0851mywrla8qmr9hb8jgfjr-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash: line 5:  6964 Segmentation fault      HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tst> FAIL: gfx.scm> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server> PASS: fading.scm> ======================================> 1 of 8 tests failed> (3 tests were not run)> Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org> ======================================> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---> > I’m putting bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org in Cc, hoping that this time our> message can be delivered.> > If this doesn’t work we should mark this package unsupported for> i686-linux.> > -- > Ricardo> 

I also took a look at this package last week and I saw it still failedthe tests on i686-linux. I would like to note, however, that it doesbuild and pass the test suite on powerpc-linux.
-- Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנרGPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

is:open	open issues
is:done	closed issues
submitter:<who>	search issue submitter
author:<who>	search by message author
date:yesterday..now	search by issue date
mdate:3m..2d	search by message date