guile-sdl-0.5.2 fails to install on i686

Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote on 26 Nov 2015 23:31

Recipients:(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)

Message-ID:1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org

Hi,
I'm using Guix 0.9.0 on Debian 8 (i686). Running the following command:
$ guix package -i guile-sdl
Results in the following error:

Toggle snippet (26 lines)======================================1 of 9 tests failed(2 tests were not run)Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org======================================Makefile:352: recipe for target 'check-TESTS' failedmake[2]: *** [check-TESTS] Error 1make[2]: Leaving directory'/tmp/nix-build-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv-0/guile-sdl-0.5.2/test'Makefile:475: recipe for target 'check-am' failedmake[1]: *** [check-am] Error 2make[1]: Leaving directory'/tmp/nix-build-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv-0/guile-sdl-0.5.2/test'Makefile:415: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failedmake: *** [check-recursive] Error 1phase `check' failed after 24.3 secondsbuilder for`/gnu/store/zq1lxrsqsn3xkzcg0z4s88j5pgjndijm-guile-sdl-0.5.2.drv' failedwith exit code 1cannot build derivation`/gnu/store/0wlwdvdj7xba6kljfwxxsg4ch7ckdrgs-profile.drv': 1dependencies couldn't be builtguix package: error: build failed: build of`/gnu/store/0wlwdvdj7xba6kljfwxxsg4ch7ckdrgs-profile.drv' failed

Hydra also says the package is failing to build:
http://hydra.gnu.org/build/814627#tabs-summary

Thanks,
-- Luis Felipe López Acevedohttp://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 29 Nov 2015 12:49

Guile-SDL 0.5.2 test failure i686-linux-gnu

Recipients:(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:874mg5m3dk.fsf@gnu.org

Hello!
On GNU Guix, we’re seeing one 100% reproducible test failure oni686-linux-gnu:

Toggle snippet (22 lines)/gnu/store/isxqjfaglyfsbcv75y8qbqbph8v28ykr-bash-4.3.39/bin/bash: line 5:   838 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tstFAIL: gfx.scm_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/PASS: fading.scm======================================1 of 9 tests failed(2 tests were not run)Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org======================================

(Note that we run tests with the Xvfb server. Seehttp://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/sdl.scm#n303.)
The backtrace is mildly informative:

Toggle snippet (12 lines)

$ gdb $(type -P guile) coreGNU gdb (GDB) 7.10
[...]
(gdb) bt#0 0xf4d98130 in SDL_imageFilterSubByteMMX (Src1=0x5d <error: Cannot access memory at address 0x5d>, Dest=0xffb429c8 "]", SrcLength=4107944472, C=152 '\230') at SDL_imageFilter.c:2185#1 0x09cfd470 in ?? ()Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

That SrcLength is so high suggests it might be an integer overflow.
This is with SDL_image 1.2.12.
To reproduce with Guix, run:
guix build guile-sdl -s i686-linux --keep-failed
Thanks,Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 5 Feb 2016 14:13

Recipients:(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87lh6zl2qn.fsf@gnu.org

Hi!
I’m not seeing the message below athttp://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile-sdl/, so resending it.(This is from http://bugs.gnu.org/22020.)
Ludo’.

X-From-Line: unknown Fri Feb 05 08:09:19 2016X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.orgSubject: bug#22020: Guile-SDL 0.5.2 test failure i686-linux-gnuResent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.orgResent-Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:51:02 +0000Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22020.B22020.144879782929926@debbugs.gnu.org>Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.orgX-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22020X-GNU-PR-Package: guixX-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org, 22020@debbugs.gnu.orgCc: 22020@debbugs.gnu.orgReceived: via spool by 22020-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22020.144879782929926          (code B ref 22020); Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:51:02 +0000Received: (at 22020) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2015 11:50:29 +0000Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58806 helo=debbugs.gnu.org)	by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80)	(envelope-from <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>)	id 1a30Uv-0007mb-3U	for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:29 -0500Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a30UZ-0007m6-Uc for 22020@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:26 -0500Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a30UU-0007B4-HE for 22020@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:07 -0500X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on eggs.gnu.orgX-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.3.2Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51956) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a30UU-0007Aw-Er; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:02 -0500Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:51244 helo=pluto) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1a30UT-0006iv-J6; Sun, 29 Nov 2015 06:50:02 -0500From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)References: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org>Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 12:49:59 +0100In-Reply-To: <1448577083.28162.7.camel@openmailbox.org> ("Luis Felipe =?utf-8?Q?L=C3=B3pez?= Acevedo"'s message of "Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:31:23 -0500")Message-ID: <874mg5m3dk.fsf@gnu.org>User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value).X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::eX-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.orgX-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15Precedence: listList-Id: <debbugs-submit.debbugs.gnu.org>List-Unsubscribe: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/debbugs-submit,  <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>List-Archive: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/debbugs-submit/List-Post: <mailto:debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org>List-Help: <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=help>List-Subscribe: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debbugs-submit,  <mailto:debbugs-submit-request@debbugs.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.orgSender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>X-Spam-Score: -5.0 (-----)MIME-Version: 1.0Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello!
On GNU Guix, we=E2=80=99re seeing one 100% reproducible test failure oni686-linux-gnu:

Toggle snippet (26 lines)/gnu/store/isxqjfaglyfsbcv75y8qbqbph8v28ykr-bash-4.3.39/bin/bash: line 5:  = 838 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) HAVE_TTF=3D1 HAVE_MIXER=3D0 sh z=ow ${dir}$tstFAIL: gfx.scm_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/misc/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/TTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/OTF/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/Type1/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/100dpi/_FontTransOpen: Unable to Parse address ${prefix}/share/fonts/X11/75dpi/PASS: fading.scm=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D==3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D1 of 9 tests failed(2 tests were not run)Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D==3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D

(Note that we run tests with the Xvfb server. Seehttp://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/sdl.scm#n303.)
The backtrace is mildly informative:

Toggle snippet (13 lines)

$ gdb $(type -P guile) coreGNU gdb (GDB) 7.10
[...]
(gdb) bt#0 0xf4d98130 in SDL_imageFilterSubByteMMX (Src1=3D0x5d <error: Cannot acc=ess memory at address 0x5d>, Dest=3D0xffb429c8 "]",=20 SrcLength=3D4107944472, C=3D152 '\230') at SDL_imageFilter.c:2185#1 0x09cfd470 in ?? ()Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)

That SrcLength is so high suggests it might be an integer overflow.
This is with SDL_image 1.2.12.
To reproduce with Guix, run:
guix build guile-sdl -s i686-linux --keep-failed
Thanks,Ludo=E2=80=99.

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 2 Jun 2016 21:41

control message for bug #22020

Recipients:(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87oa7j2xb1.fsf@gnu.org

severity 22020 minor

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 14 May 2020 19:55

guile-sdl-0.5.2 fails to install on i686

Recipients:(address . 22020@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org)

Message-ID:87k11eiepr.fsf@elephly.net

Guile SDL 0.5.2 still fails on i686:

Toggle snippet (22 lines)The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreenErrors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X serverThe XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreenErrors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server/gnu/store/v1g7f3p4f0851mywrla8qmr9hb8jgfjr-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash: line 5:  6964 Segmentation fault      HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tstFAIL: gfx.scmThe XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreenErrors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X serverThe XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreenErrors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X serverPASS: fading.scm======================================1 of 8 tests failed(3 tests were not run)Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org======================================

I’m putting bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org in Cc, hoping that this time ourmessage can be delivered.
If this doesn’t work we should mark this package unsupported fori686-linux.
-- Ricardo

Efraim Flashner wrote on 17 May 2020 14:05

Recipients:(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)

Message-ID:20200517120548.GD31833@E5400

On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 07:55:12PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:

Toggle quote (35 lines)> Guile SDL 0.5.2 still fails on i686:> > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server> /gnu/store/v1g7f3p4f0851mywrla8qmr9hb8jgfjr-bash-minimal-5.0.16/bin/bash: line 5:  6964 Segmentation fault      HAVE_TTF=1 HAVE_MIXER=0 sh zow ${dir}$tst> FAIL: gfx.scm> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server> The XKEYBOARD keymap compiler (xkbcomp) reports:> > Internal error:   Could not resolve keysym XF86FullScreen> Errors from xkbcomp are not fatal to the X server> PASS: fading.scm> ======================================> 1 of 8 tests failed> (3 tests were not run)> Please report to bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org> ======================================> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---> > I’m putting bug-guile-sdl@gnu.org in Cc, hoping that this time our> message can be delivered.> > If this doesn’t work we should mark this package unsupported for> i686-linux.> > -- > Ricardo> 

I also took a look at this package last week and I saw it still failedthe tests on i686-linux. I would like to note, however, that it doesbuild and pass the test suite on powerpc-linux.
-- Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   אפרים פלשנרGPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send email to 22020@debbugs.gnu.org

is:open	open issues
is:done	closed issues
submitter:<who>	search issue submitter
author:<who>	search by message author
date:yesterday..now	search by issue date
mdate:3m..2d	search by message date