[PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Efraim Flashner
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • zimoun
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Efraim Flashner
Severity
normal
E
E
Efraim Flashner wrote on 12 Feb 2019 10:17
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)(address . 34427@debbugs.gnu.org)
20190212091740.GB3284@macbook41
When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for
guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
architecture.


--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> ????? ?????
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
Attachment: 0001-gnu-guile-static-Build-for-guile-2.0.patch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEoov0DD5VE3JmLRT3Qarn3Mo9g1EFAlxijy4ACgkQQarn3Mo9
g1FRzBAApDrqkMANqwivufw3E8YzhhHi4owAMHX65UHLybOzVYJK3cMWJEZhp1pl
TOLtgKfOkv95BA4MR5Ju/DEgwyXgg9Zc2U88PmkpK/7v0MJMAWg24ZeBiZy+p6mO
hgy4F2Wz+oXKa6QsbtqWNUB/h8kS9Y/PZk2+Nk20dISwfQosrJtfZUFBPF6uh/rR
MWRTl/WziLwNIbCzaqJ5DO+qYmyJp7fM6k190vPGNIGwN1id3/bn6gjwyyiqDoHH
W7/jkt/YxLdxopEGVejFgNyjzcenWbkkCEBg3piGzQ6ZjetzpgDlKDttP5oHkCuJ
PbKVbvSfC9sH3YiQfabcBb7Hc4nzpLuEnayKdSzht98PhHV4xAEMgv5sVbJ/oIIl
4BsUk+t+b8FVNE6rHEbt8N2yYfOwbEw6wNSeYJhtcubKYmtguLo0aZzARt1Xv9sM
1LI9p+/AtjBk0CshQqaZsKnmfx60B+nzFq8TR+wkupiV5WTYDORGj2NvCR4dTQ9Q
iCYaVoa2tnn2kCqOPjxTbTXztLLi3QUZa8L2Zzq3Wb0MGie0pLXLWsd9WPhZnhNA
hkSemoVDT+0H9o1KBG4DlkWRrqEElRdaCIk3f8DrPK59nLnpnlKAAvGXIWHcEXq7
nFFMKGNRHiT+gL7//OR9Mp/Zcf9cgAzpVzzNpEzB9QQVDsQSaP0=
=Ztlx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 16 Feb 2019 17:06
(name . Efraim Flashner)(address . efraim@flashner.co.il)
87mumvhg5u.fsf@gnu.org
Hi Efraim,

Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for
> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
> architecture.

As discussed in https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427, I would rather
fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
problem.

Ludo’.
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 12 Apr 2022 12:10
Re: bug#34453: [PATCH] build guile-static with guile-2.0
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
86o816394u.fsf_-_@gmail.com
Hi,

What is the status of this old patch #34453?



On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
Toggle quote (10 lines)
> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
>
>> When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for
>> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
>> architecture.
>
> As discussed in <https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427>, I would rather
> fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
> problem.

Note that #34427 is still open.


Cheers,
simon
E
E
Efraim Flashner wrote on 13 Apr 2022 23:07
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)
Ylc7ezs6vG2ee5LE@pbp
On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:10:09PM +0200, zimoun wrote:
Toggle quote (20 lines)
> Hi,
>
> What is the status of this old patch #34453?
>
> http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/34453
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:
> >
> >> When experimenting I found that using guile@2.0 as a base for
> >> guile-static, the resulting guile-static didn't segfault on the target
> >> architecture.
> >
> > As discussed in <https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427>, I would rather
> > fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
> > problem.
>
> Note that #34427 is still open.

We can probably drop it. We'll pick it back up again if/when it comes up
again.

--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> ????? ?????
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=gEp1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 23 Jun 2022 10:14
(name . Efraim Flashner)(address . efraim@flashner.co.il)
86wnd794p9.fsf_-_@gmail.com
Hi,

On Thu, 14 Apr 2022 at 00:07, Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> wrote:
Toggle quote (13 lines)
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 12:10:09PM +0200, zimoun wrote:
>> On Sat, 16 Feb 2019 at 17:06, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>> > Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis:

>> > As discussed in <https://issues.guix.info/issue/34427>, I would rather
>> > fix the segfault in 2.2 than move back to 2.0 and effectively delay the
>> > problem.
>>
>> Note that #34427 is still open.
>
> We can probably drop it. We'll pick it back up again if/when it comes up
> again.

Therefore, I am closing.


Cheers,
simon
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 34453@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 34453
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch