[PATCH] update pipewire and wireplumber

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Andreas Enge
  • Nicolas Graves
  • squishypinkelephant
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
squishypinkelephant
Severity
normal
S
S
squishypinkelephant wrote on 9 Oct 16:58 +0200
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)(name . squishypinkelephant)(address . squishypinkelephant@gmail.com)
8cb39713fd5a2991114cb424cef320af849b6c16.1728485857.git.squishypinkelephant@gmail.com
opposed to https://issues.guix.gnu.org/73372it's probably better to update both at the same time...

Change-Id: I9fdb9714ed339e0623c9190fcd11b63b51aa28a8
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (44 lines)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 4695ec2eaf..25641834dc 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
@@ -9867,7 +9867,7 @@ (define-public inputattach
(define-public pipewire
(package
(name "pipewire")
- (version "1.0.3")
+ (version "1.2.5")
(source (origin
(method git-fetch)
(uri (git-reference
@@ -9876,7 +9876,7 @@ (define-public pipewire
(file-name (git-file-name name version))
(sha256
(base32
- "10psfk260pqgi375d5q80yyzy2a1jabs3cgvrd0w18sdwi1knp21"))))
+ "0mjr3sz0y9szqaws84c05qbdiaayagx1yvw836ynvkbr5c9dr33i"))))
(build-system meson-build-system)
(arguments
(list
@@ -9932,7 +9932,7 @@ (define-public pipewire
(define-public wireplumber
(package
(name "wireplumber")
- (version "0.5.3")
+ (version "0.5.6")
(source
(origin
(method git-fetch)
@@ -9942,7 +9942,7 @@ (define-public wireplumber
(commit version)))
(file-name (git-file-name name version))
(sha256
- (base32 "1jdfk02f7yc5lhy4r3k7m7dqr0711lvlc0fd1hjhmi4j7yn4i5kd"))))
+ (base32 "0wcw70dsnji81cn5x0c49hrkpbwb19bj0v2n1byjc80blnapn32h"))))
(build-system meson-build-system)
(arguments
`(#:configure-flags '("-Dsystemd=disabled"

base-commit: d44beb9b4ad836781928a0c5667e94c0d6df13f0
--
2.46.0
T
T
The Man wrote on 14 Oct 03:31 +0200
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)
CAPfwWaiXWQC2E9PVi4274bOnFW3FB8sLmATdYO1SdRcY4n2z4w@mail.gmail.com
Just checking in, no new failures reported by qa. I believe this is
good to go whenever.
N
N
Nicolas Graves wrote on 20 Oct 09:09 +0200
QA review for 73720
871q0b5jzg.fsf@ngraves.fr
user guix
usertag 73720 + reviewed-looks-good
thanks

Guix QA review form submission:
LGTM

Items marked as checked: Lint warnings, Package builds, Commit messages

--
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves
A
A
Andreas Enge wrote on 22 Oct 10:47 +0200
Applied
(address . 73372@debbugs.gnu.org)
ZxdmnIsxrDfjcGow@jurong
Hello,

when updating several packages, this should be done in one commit per package,
even if all of them are pushed together.

I have applied all three packages of issues 73372 and 73720 (the one of
73372 to keep attribution), trusting the observation that they have been
handled successfully by QA before.

Thanks for the patches and the review!

Andreas
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 73720@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 73720
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch