texlive packages such as texlive-luatex are not reproducible

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Nicolas Goaziou
  • Maxim Cournoyer
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Maxim Cournoyer
Severity
important
Merged with
M
M
Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 3 Oct 14:19 +0200
texlive-luatex is not reproducible
(name . bug-guix)(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
87wmipfkfu.fsf@gmail.com
Hello,
This was discovered building texlive-luatex twice (--rounds=2 -K);
diffoscope shows that:
Toggle snippet (48 lines)
? ? ? ? ??? +++ /gnu/store/jyfqmfrhg3m0njdy8yi0qrgqfilaldf2-texlive-luatex-2024.2-check/share/texmf-dist/web2c/luatex/dviluatex.fmt
? ? ? ? ? ??? dviluatex.fmt-content
? ? ? ? ? ?? xxd not available in path. Falling back to Python hexlify.
? ? ? ? ? ? @@ -231852,20 +231852,20 @@
? ? ? ? ? ? 3373796c203174696d20327431696e203174696f203574697120746934752072
? ? ? ? ? ? 733565722e2031746976206d65347461206c75737334203174697a206d653174
? ? ? ? ? ? 65206d34657472207561356e612074356c612075616e3469206c3576656e2075
? ? ? ? ? ? 74696f6e3561206c35766574342074356c6f20746d653420747261336220746f
? ? ? ? ? ? 33622032746f6620747261733420756172326420746f7332206572346e697320
? ? ? ? ? ? 7561723369203465726e6974203565726e697a20756172337420346669636174
? ? ? ? ? ? 6520347561622075616334203174726120753161742075623465207561763420
? ? ? ? ? ? -75316234692000000000aa206f626c69672d612d746f7279206465632d6c692d
? ? ? ? ? ? -6e612d74696f6e2061732d736f2d6369617465732061732d736f2d6369617465
? ? ? ? ? ? -20726563692d70726f636974792072652d636f672d6e692d7a616e6365207265
? ? ? ? ? ? -742d72692d62752d74696f6e207265662d6f722d6d612d74696f6e2070726f6a
? ? ? ? ? ? -656374732074612d626c652070726573656e7473207068696c2d616e2d746872
? ? ? ? ? ? -6f7069632070726f6a6563742070726573656e74000000000100000001000000
? ? ? ? ? ? +75316234692000000000aa2070726573656e74732074612d626c652070726573
? ? ? ? ? ? +656e74206465632d6c692d6e612d74696f6e2070726f6a6563742061732d736f
? ? ? ? ? ? +2d636961746573207265662d6f722d6d612d74696f6e207265742d72692d6275
? ? ? ? ? ? +2d74696f6e2072652d636f672d6e692d7a616e63652061732d736f2d63696174
? ? ? ? ? ? +6520726563692d70726f63697479206f626c69672d612d746f72792070726f6a
? ? ? ? ? ? +65637473207068696c2d616e2d7468726f706963000000000100000001000000
? ? ? ? ? ? 2d000000000000000000000000ffffffff00041d8d7562326c20327472656220
? ? ? ? ? ? 32747265632032743372656420327433726567206d65733473616c2075633163
? ? ? ? ? ? 20327433726568206d65733473616e2032743372656b2032743372656c202e66
? ? ? ? ? ? 6cc3b636733573656e2e20753163692074327279206d65733473617520753163
? ? ? ? ? ? 6c20757333c3a47320756175327320676133756e74206d657334736179207472
? ? ? ? ? ? 3465327520753364326120327433726576206e7433c3a46e64206e653473616c
? ? ? ? ? ? 20753163722074327333733220747265337820747374322032743372657a202e
? ? ? ? ? ? @@ -268094,99 +268094,99 @@
? ? ? ? ? ? 2033746f2e2074336c612074336c692068696537726f6e792074336c6f206161
? ? ? ? ? ? 74367374692069653673377461616c207661346b6573206d616e366e2d70206e
? ? ? ? ? ? 7661366c697320c3af6e35756e642073356b616b7420347472616620616c6937
? ? ? ? ? ? 676c617320753462336167203473356b616c662033746f672075626173342074
? ? ? ? ? ? 7261743420746f3173207661356b69652065336b616e2061726b366c6f73202e
? ? ? ? ? ? 7369377261672e2065657273376c616d2034736b61722e202e7a653575732034
? ? ? ? ? ? 736b616e742061723664356167742075623366206e6534726f73200000000a9b
? ? ? ? ? ? -20706161726c2d6f6f7320646575722d737765722d776520706f652d746f652d
? ? ? ? ? ? -706170207672652d6465732d656e2d67656c206f6d2d6d652d7377616169206f
? ? ? ? ? ? -2d72612d676965206c616e672d7465722d6d796e2d696d2d70616b20696e2d74
? ? ? ? ? ? -77792d66656c2d7472656b2d6b696e672076616c2d726565702d6c6565722067
? ? ? ? ? ? -652d626564732d6b65742d74696e6720626161642d6a69652d6d6f752d652064
? ? ? ? ? ? -72756b2d6b65722d666f6e7473206c696d662d776565662d73656c206b616d2d
? ? ? ? ? ? -7374692d676520737472652d706965732d6665722d7765656c2064692d612d6c
? ? ? ? ? ? -656b2d776f6f722d64652d626f656b20747769732d61702d70656c206d61616e
[...]
These are apparently time stamps as well as UUIDs. Debian [0, 1] and
NixOS [1] have patched some of them using faketime and substitute [0].
We should follow suite.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
M
M
Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 3 Oct 15:24 +0200
control message for bug #73613
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
8734ldfhfu.fsf@gmail.com
retitle 73613 texlive packages such as texlive-luatex are not reproducible
quit
M
M
Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 4 Oct 02:25 +0200
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87ldz4emu9.fsf@gmail.com
severity 73613 important
quit
M
M
Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 4 Oct 02:25 +0200
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87jzeoemto.fsf@gmail.com
merge 73613 48455
quit
N
N
Nicolas Goaziou wrote on 20 Oct 10:40 +0200
Re: bug#73613: texlive-luatex is not reproducible
(name . Maxim Cournoyer)(address . maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com)(address . 73613@debbugs.gnu.org)
87r08b6ub6.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr
Hello,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> writes:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> This was discovered building texlive-luatex twice (--rounds=2 -K);
> diffoscope shows that:
>

[...]

Toggle quote (8 lines)
> These are apparently time stamps as well as UUIDs. Debian [0, 1] and
> NixOS [1] have patched some of them using faketime and substitute [0].
>
> We should follow suite.
>
> [0] https://salsa.debian.org/live-team/live-build/-/blob/master/examples/hooks/reproducible/2006-reproducible-texlive-binaries-fmt-files.hook.chroot
> [1] https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/227873

This is difficult to follow, because Debian and NixOS do not seem to
apply the same fixes. For example, the former wraps "faketime" around
"tex -ini tex.ini" call whereas the latter wraps it around
"fmtutil-sys --all" call.

By the way, how do you call "faketime" from (guix build-system texlive)?
It is not possible to use (gnu packages check) module from there, isn't
it?

Note that Guix never runs "mtxrun --generate", so I don't think UUIDs
are a problem in our case.

Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 73613@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 73613
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch