failed to compute the derivation for Guix

> [hjebbari@cluster24 ~]$ guix pull

> Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'...

> Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to a47d7af (2 new commits)...

> Building from this channel:

> guixhttps://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git a47d7af

> building /gnu/store/21c7pjahkh20mmzq2ivki57zwwvp6nwn-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv...

> building /gnu/store/ih5923dvfg64nlpibc4qfa22jkyqykrm-bootar-1b.drv...

> building /gnu/store/jc3vgcsplqsim3na80b0n2iilna5j6gx-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv...

> View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/3c/c3xp9p4xdm1hkbxshcmwvk49vqg7jq-patch-mesboot-2.5.9.drv.gz'.

> Backtrace:

>           14 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/38agwh7x3v43jhl06ginx2080zc8isfj-compute-guix-derivation")

> In ice-9/eval.scm:

>     155:9 13 (_ _)

>     159:9 12 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))

> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:

>     152:2 11 (with-fluid* _ _ _)

>     152:2 10 (with-fluid* _ _ _)

> In ./guix/store.scm:

>   2210:24  9 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.100 7f12815410a0> #<procedure 7f12696ada00 at ./guix/self.scm:1?> ?)

>    2038:8  8 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7f12815410a0>)

> In ./guix/gexp.scm:

>    300:22  7 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7f12815410a0>)

>    1218:2  6 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7f12815410a0>)

>    1085:2  5 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7f12815410a0>)

>     926:4  4 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7f12815410a0>)

> In ./guix/store.scm:

>   2095:12  3 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7f12815410a0>)

>    1433:5  2 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.100 7f12815410a0> #<procedure 7f126dc55920 at ./guix/sto?> ?)

>   1449:15  1 (_ #<store-connection 256.100 7f12815410a0> ("/gnu/store/i9y8962w382ivw7n66i6vdj2dxg3qi7r-guix-daem?" ?) ?)

>   1449:15  0 (loop #f)

>

> ./guix/store.scm:1449:15: In procedure loop:

> ERROR:

>   1. &store-protocol-error:

>       message: "build of `/gnu/store/r7qvm0ad2qxdm000mlfbr8c8wxw2jfvf-git-minimal-2.46.0.drv' failed"

>       status: 100

> Unfortunately my GUIX is still in a bad mood or worst, since I have

> troubles with all users now.

> The issue is not limited to the "pull", I have also a problem with the

> command "guix package -i hello":

> / 'build' phasebuilder for `/gnu/store/3cc3xp9p4xdm1hkbxshcmwvk49vqg7jq-patch-mesboot-2.5.9.drv' failed with exit code 1

> I will continue to dig in a little, but I wonder if a complete

> re-install could be an option ?

> Hi Fabrice,

>

>> Unfortunately my GUIX is still in a bad mood or worst, since I have

>> troubles with all users now.

> Oh! It means something is incorrectly configured for sure. :-(

>

>

>> The issue is not limited to the "pull", I have also a problem with the

>> command "guix package -i hello":

> Yes, that’s expected. Because you have a tiny difference really deep in

> the graph of dependencies, and that difference triggers a complete world

> rebuild.

>

>> / 'build' phasebuilder for `/gnu/store/3cc3xp9p4xdm1hkbxshcmwvk49vqg7jq-patch-mesboot-2.5.9.drv' failed with exit code 1

> Well, the fact MES (bootstrap) does not build for you is another

> problem. Somehow, it is known that the full-bootstrap [1] is sensible

> to parameters as hardware for example. If correctly configured, you

> should not build from the start but just download substitutes.

>

>> I will continue to dig in a little, but I wonder if a complete

>> re-install could be an option ?

> IMHO, for digging a bit, I would try to catch the difference. We have

> two tools at hand: derivation and builder script.

>

> For instance, let go back to the previous email. If I read correctly,

> you get:

>

> /gnu/store/jc3vgcsplqsim3na80b0n2iilna5j6gx-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv

>

> but I cannot scrutinize it since I am not able to locally reproduce

> it. :-) Could you please share:

>

> cat /gnu/store/jc3vgcsplqsim3na80b0n2iilna5j6gx-Python-3-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv \

> | sed 's/)/)\n/g'

>

> ? This will list all the inputs. The first thing is to check the

> fixed-output: you must have,

>

> /gnu/store/lb5b7svdmfj1ijnzrripsjcv0bhqzpwb-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv

>

> If not, ouch! Then you should have 3 inputs:

>

> /gnu/store/38951a2gcwb4jyrwlzg634jfwkdih7m2-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv

> /gnu/store/ff107pg13nkarix7k9hgxxwx9cnn4602-module-import-compiled.drv

> /gnu/store/g08l2msvnivyi6x5nw52ak8n17sw9lzr-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv

>

> Which one is different? None? One? More? Based on that we can

> restrict the space of research.

>

> The other part is the script builder. For me, it reads:

>

> /gnu/store/ykqckrxcmifvxz0nb58lv2drgd14l377-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder

>

> Is it the same? If yes, we will focus on above. If no, could you

> attach the file?

>

> Cheers,

> simon

>

> PS: Hum, I do not know why your reply is not visible by Debbugs… Anyway!

> For the record and maybe the ease for referencing, here some information

> I extract from my own inbox since I had been CC.

>

> Message-ID:<8e618239-551a-4c1c-91b4-91a0fca987e2@univ-rennes1.fr>

> Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 15:49:36 +0200

> References:<ef914e42-7ae6-474e-a620-8a90f83a0136@univ-rennes1.fr>

> In-Reply-To:<87y135ql8w.fsf@gmail.com>

>

> 1:https://simon.tournier.info/posts/2023-10-01-bootstrapping.html

> GUIX seem's to work fine with the root account and the local users but

> not with ldap users.

> 1-

> [root@cluster24 ~]# cat /gnu/store/jc3vgcsplqsim3na80b0n2iilna5j6gx-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv | sed 's/)/)\n/g'

> Derive([("out","/gnu/store/cv4h89n30myf3nhjqnnahlbij2gaw21z-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz","","")

> ],[("/gnu/store/21c7pjahkh20mmzq2ivki57zwwvp6nwn-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv",["out"])

> ,("/gnu/store/5gf7f8awndhnf2gn2mzbfbqr3ix9aj80-module-import-compiled.drv",["out"])

> ,("/gnu/store/g08l2msvnivyi6x5nw52ak8n17sw9lzr-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv",["out"])

> ,("/gnu/store/lb5b7svdmfj1ijnzrripsjcv0bhqzpwb-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv",["out"])

> ],["/gnu/store/1s8jdafkyhz0p81l0j37yih9gbrb5gix-module-import","/gnu/store/h58cvdcdak4d87lw0fkvmkhan95ssljx-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder"],"x86_64-linux","/gnu/store/lgi9x15a0w35mcpd7g1kb9274r6wy4pv-guile-bootstrap-2.0/bin/guile",["--no-auto-compile","-L","/gnu/store/1s8jdafkyhz0p81l0j37yih9gbrb5gix-module-import","-C","/gnu/store/gz5rcilhcsc5amgxcgyxvn0s5px8sg80-module-import-compiled","/gnu/store/h58cvdcdak4d87lw0fkvmkhan95ssljx-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder"],[("guix properties","((type . origin)

> (patches . 0)

> )

> ")

> ,("out","/gnu/store/cv4h89n30myf3nhjqnnahlbij2gaw21z-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz")

> ])

>

>

> 2 -The script builder

> /gnu/store/ykqckrxcmifvxz0nb58lv2drgd14l377-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder

> is well present in /gnu/store.

>

> Hi Simon,

>

> Thanks again for your involvement.

>

> I did my best to fullfill the tests you suggest. I put the output in

> your text.

>

> Essentially the output are the same for the root and the users, so the

> situation does not seem clearer to me, but I’m sure it will be

> different for you.

>

> Regards

>

> Fabrice T

> Le 11/10/2024 à 18:30, Simon Tournier a écrit :

>> Hi Fabrice,

>>

>> On Fri, 11 Oct 2024 at 15:13, Fabrice Tudoret<fabrice.tudoret@univ-rennes1.fr> wrote:

>>

>>> GUIX seem's to work fine with the root account and the local users but

>>> not with ldap users.

>> Ah, that doesn’t ring a bell but maybe it’s related. I don’t know.

>>

>>

>>> 1-

>> Just to be sure and since you have reinstalled, what is your Guix

>> revision?

> [root@cluster24 ~]# guix --version

> guix (GNU Guix) 7888351b9edd7b0199a973c75bc1c35897d9d7ef

> Copyright (C) 2024 the Guix authors

> License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later<http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>

> This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it.

> There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.

>

>

>

>> On a side note, since it seems fine for the root account and here you

>> run it as root, I guess all is fine. :-) Although I don’t have the

>> same… ?

>>

>>> [root@cluster24 ~]# cat /gnu/store/jc3vgcsplqsim3na80b0n2iilna5j6gx-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv | sed 's/)/)\n/g'

>>> Derive([("out","/gnu/store/cv4h89n30myf3nhjqnnahlbij2gaw21z-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz","","")

>>> ],[("/gnu/store/21c7pjahkh20mmzq2ivki57zwwvp6nwn-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv",["out"])

>>> ,("/gnu/store/5gf7f8awndhnf2gn2mzbfbqr3ix9aj80-module-import-compiled.drv",["out"])

>>> ,("/gnu/store/g08l2msvnivyi6x5nw52ak8n17sw9lzr-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv",["out"])

>>> ,("/gnu/store/lb5b7svdmfj1ijnzrripsjcv0bhqzpwb-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv",["out"])

>>> ],["/gnu/store/1s8jdafkyhz0p81l0j37yih9gbrb5gix-module-import","/gnu/store/h58cvdcdak4d87lw0fkvmkhan95ssljx-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder"],"x86_64-linux","/gnu/store/lgi9x15a0w35mcpd7g1kb9274r6wy4pv-guile-bootstrap-2.0/bin/guile",["--no-auto-compile","-L","/gnu/store/1s8jdafkyhz0p81l0j37yih9gbrb5gix-module-import","-C","/gnu/store/gz5rcilhcsc5amgxcgyxvn0s5px8sg80-module-import-compiled","/gnu/store/h58cvdcdak4d87lw0fkvmkhan95ssljx-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder"],[("guix properties","((type . origin)

>>> (patches . 0)

>>> )

>>> ")

>>> ,("out","/gnu/store/cv4h89n30myf3nhjqnnahlbij2gaw21z-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz")

>>> ])

>>>

>>>

>>> 2 -The script builder

>>> /gnu/store/ykqckrxcmifvxz0nb58lv2drgd14l377-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder

>>> is well present in /gnu/store.

>> Ouf. :-)

>>

>>

>> Well, since it works as expected when run as root (#) and it fails when

>> run as a regular ($), I propose to diff various files in order to spot

>> what could be wrong.

>>

>> Some details about some internals – well my understanding and I’m

>> perhaps missing important points –, then maybe they will explain the

>> logic behind the exploration. :-)

>>

>> Roughly speaking, the items in the store look like:

>>

>> /gnu/store/xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx-foobar-1.2.3

>>

>> where ’foobar-1.2.3’ is a “label” corresponding to the package and

>> ’xxx…’ is some hash. This hash is the core of the content-addressed;

>> the one that allow the substitution, i.e., download the artefacts.

>>

>> Basically, this hash is computed by hashing the inputs and the script

>> builders. Therefore somehow it builds a chain and the roots are named

>> fixed-outputs. Fixed-outputs are items for which we known beforehand

>> the resulting hash. Else we cannot know the hash beforehand because

>> it’s hard to know beforehand the checksum of the artefact since the

>> artefact is the result of the build process (compilation, etc.).

>>

>> In other words, the expectation is: the same inputs and the same builder

>> script returns the same store item. And the derivation captures that.

>> Well, for sure the content of the store item on two machines is the same

>> only if the process is fully deterministic; another story. ;-)

>>

>> All that to say: if we scrutinize the derivations and the builder

>> scripts, then we will spot what introduces a difference.

>>

>> Aside, please note that two different derivations might produce the same

>> store item, see for example [1].

>>

>> Let’s go! :-)

>>

>>

>> a) Both root and regular must use the exact same Guix revision.

>>

>> # As root

>> # readlink -f (type -P guix)

>> # guix describe

>>

> [root@cluster24 ~]# readlink -f guix

>

> /root/guix

>

> [root@cluster24 ~]# type -P guix

>

> /root/.config/guix/current/bin/guix

>

> [root@cluster24 ~]# guix describe

>

> Generation 3 Oct 14 2024 08:46:12 (current)

>

> guix 7888351

>

> repository URL:https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git

>

> branch: master

>

> commit: 7888351b9edd7b0199a973c75bc1c35897d9d7ef

>

>> $ As regular user

>> $ readlink -f (type -P guix)

>> $ guix describe

>

> [fmenna@cluster24 ~]$ readlink -f guix

>

> /NAS/home/fmenna/guix

>

> [fmenna@cluster24 ~]$ type -P guix

>

> /usr/local/bin/guix

>

> [fmenna@cluster24 ~]$ guix describe

>

> guix 7888351

>

> repository URL:https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git

>

> branch: master

>

> commit: 7888351b9edd7b0199a973c75bc1c35897d9d7ef

>

>> b) If that’s not the case, it isn’t an issue for the following but it’s

>> better to know. :-)

>

>      It's seem ok.

>

>> c) Display the both derivations, as root and as regular user

>>

>> # guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

>

> [root@cluster24 ~]# guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

> /gnu/store/mbnrrqjizy3dvma9i3l8g5yvzi2p04ys-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv

>

>> $ guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

>

> [fmenna@cluster24 ~]$  guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

> user with UID 255759 not found

> /gnu/store/mbnrrqjizy3dvma9i3l8g5yvzi2p04ys-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv

>

> I hope the message "user with UID 255759 not found" has nothing to do

> with the issue.

>

>

>> The expected situation is: as root,

>>

>> # guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S

>>

>> it just downloads stuff but as regular user:

>>

>> $ guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S

>>

>> then it builds stuff and one build fails.

>>

>> Correct?

>

> There is no indication that it builds or fails.

>

>

>> d) Display the content of the both derivations, as root and and regular

>> user.

>>

>> drv=$(guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -d -S)

>> cat $drv | sed 's/),/\n),/g'

>

>

> [root@cluster24 ~]# drv=$(guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -d -S)

>   cat $drv | sed 's/),/\n),/g'

> Derive([("out","/gnu/store/jl82wnklrfhjgnml3s3w0l4m4mjwpazb-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz","","")],[("/gnu/store/38951a2gcwb4jyrwlzg634jfwkdih7m2-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv",["out"]

> ),("/gnu/store/ff107pg13nkarix7k9hgxxwx9cnn4602-module-import-compiled.drv",["out"]

> ),("/gnu/store/g08l2msvnivyi6x5nw52ak8n17sw9lzr-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv",["out"]

> ),("/gnu/store/lb5b7svdmfj1ijnzrripsjcv0bhqzpwb-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv",["out"])],["/gnu/store/jsxgc979x79h81kzqz9n6cpf5pk4z262-module-import","/gnu/store/ykqckrxcmifvxz0nb58lv2drgd14l377-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder"],"x86_64-linux","/gnu/store/lgi9x15a0w35mcpd7g1kb9274r6wy4pv-guile-bootstrap-2.0/bin/guile",["--no-auto-compile","-L","/gnu/store/jsxgc979x79h81kzqz9n6cpf5pk4z262-module-import","-C","/gnu/store/j2r95mqfir1q6hsavm0r22k8z49nbvk1-module-import-compiled","/gnu/store/ykqckrxcmifvxz0nb58lv2drgd14l377-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder"],[("guix properties","((type . origin) (patches . 0))"

> ),("out","/gnu/store/jl82wnklrfhjgnml3s3w0l4m4mjwpazb-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz")])

> [fmenna@cluster24 ~]$  drv=$(guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -d -S)

>   cat $drv | sed 's/),/\n),/g'

> user with UID 255759 not found

> Derive([("out","/gnu/store/jl82wnklrfhjgnml3s3w0l4m4mjwpazb-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz","","")],[("/gnu/store/38951a2gcwb4jyrwlzg634jfwkdih7m2-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv",["out"]

> ),("/gnu/store/ff107pg13nkarix7k9hgxxwx9cnn4602-module-import-compiled.drv",["out"]

> ),("/gnu/store/g08l2msvnivyi6x5nw52ak8n17sw9lzr-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv",["out"]

> ),("/gnu/store/lb5b7svdmfj1ijnzrripsjcv0bhqzpwb-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv",["out"])],["/gnu/store/jsxgc979x79h81kzqz9n6cpf5pk4z262-module-import","/gnu/store/ykqckrxcmifvxz0nb58lv2drgd14l377-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder"],"x86_64-linux","/gnu/store/lgi9x15a0w35mcpd7g1kb9274r6wy4pv-guile-bootstrap-2.0/bin/guile",["--no-auto-compile","-L","/gnu/store/jsxgc979x79h81kzqz9n6cpf5pk4z262-module-import","-C","/gnu/store/j2r95mqfir1q6hsavm0r22k8z49nbvk1-module-import-compiled","/gnu/store/ykqckrxcmifvxz0nb58lv2drgd14l377-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz-builder"],[("guix properties","((type . origin) (patches . 0))"

> ),("out","/gnu/store/jl82wnklrfhjgnml3s3w0l4m4mjwpazb-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz")])

>

>

> There is no difference in those output between root and regular user.

>

>

>> Now we can try to find what can be wrong. :-)

>>

>>

>> Roughly, the inputs are one fixed-output and these three others:

>>

>> /gnu/store/g08l2msvnivyi6x5nw52ak8n17sw9lzr-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv

>> /gnu/store/38951a2gcwb4jyrwlzg634jfwkdih7m2-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv

>> /gnu/store/ff107pg13nkarix7k9hgxxwx9cnn4602-module-import-compiled.drv

>>

>> Well, please note that the hash of these derivations might vary but not

>> their output. For instance,

>>

>> # sed 's/]/\n]/g' \

>> /gnu/store/38951a2gcwb4jyrwlzg634jfwkdih7m2-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv \

>> | head -1

>> Derive([("out","/gnu/store/az8fi8xzgvkqw9aynxks98h29afal6i2-bootstrap-binaries-0","","")

>>

>> Here the hash ’3895…’ might be different but not ’az8fi8…’. The same

>> derivation produces the same store item though.

>>

>> Ok, let consider each. I know that piping with “sed” is not handy and

>> an extension [2] ]is still pending… Anyway, please pipe the derivations

>> in order to extract the relevant information.

> [root@cluster24 ~]# sed 's/]/\n]/g' \

>       /gnu/store/38951a2gcwb4jyrwlzg634jfwkdih7m2-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv | head -1

> Derive([("out","/gnu/store/az8fi8xzgvkqw9aynxks98h29afal6i2-bootstrap-binaries-0","","")

> [fmenna@cluster24 ~]$ sed 's/]/\n]/g' \

> >  /gnu/store/38951a2gcwb4jyrwlzg634jfwkdih7m2-bootstrap-binaries-0.drv | head -1

> Derive([("out","/gnu/store/az8fi8xzgvkqw9aynxks98h29afal6i2-bootstrap-binaries-0","","")

>

>> 1. /gnu/store/…-guile-bootstrap: it only depends on fixed-outputs so the

>> only source of variation comes from the script builder: in my case,

>>

>> /gnu/store/nmxl6qyj16bv4rx4irhg23r66gn752kd-build-bootstrap-guile.sh

>

> I have the same:

>

> [root@cluster24 ~]# find /gnu/store -name "*build-bootstrap-guile.sh"

> /gnu/store/nmxl6qyj16bv4rx4irhg23r66gn752kd-build-bootstrap-guile.sh

>

>> I expect you have the same. As root, you have because it’s the same

>> derivation, namely

>> /gnu/store/g08l2msvnivyi6x5nw52ak8n17sw9lzr-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv.

>>

>> What about the regular user?

>

> The same too.

>

>> 2. /gnu/store/…-bootstrap-binaries: the inputs reads,

>>

>> /gnu/store/ff107pg13nkarix7k9hgxxwx9cnn4602-module-import-compiled.drv

>> /gnu/store/g08l2msvnivyi6x5nw52ak8n17sw9lzr-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv

>> /gnu/store/nf9h1l2apgjq1gjdv1ynpgqrmaj1bawb-static-binaries.tar.xz.drv

>> /gnu/store/sik0rp63q7hz4wry27v3ynljdmqvg194-xz.drv

>> /gnu/store/zn60yim3km5qx8d0vzvf9izfxzfdy4x0-tar.drv

>>

>> Assuming #1 (identical guile-bootstrap) and the only non fixed-output is

>> module-import-compiled. Or the script builder.

>>

>> Do you have the same script builder, namely

>>

>> /gnu/store/kv2vjnp7f75wnq8rp579ihz96knqp0sl-bootstrap-binaries-0-builder

>>

>> ? I guess you have the same. Therefore, I guess the issue is from

>> module-import-compiled.

>

> I've the same:

>

> [root@cluster24 ~]# find /gnu/store -name "*bootstrap-binaries-0-builder"

> /gnu/store/kv2vjnp7f75wnq8rp579ihz96knqp0sl-bootstrap-binaries-0-builder

>

>

>> 3. /gnu/store/…-module-import-compiled: On my machine, it reads:

>>

>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---

>> Derive

>> ([("out","/gnu/store/j2r95mqfir1q6hsavm0r22k8z49nbvk1-module-import-compiled","","")]

>> ,[("/gnu/store/g08l2msvnivyi6x5nw52ak8n17sw9lzr-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv",["out"])]

>> ,["/gnu/store/jsxgc979x79h81kzqz9n6cpf5pk4z262-module-import","/gnu/store/l36kgiw25r2a4vllwad18jg8jnkvmzda-build-utils.scm","/gnu/store/rn7b0dq6iqfmmqyqzamix2mjmfygn31n-compile-modules"]

>> ,"x86_64-linux","/gnu/store/lgi9x15a0w35mcpd7g1kb9274r6wy4pv-guile-bootstrap-2.0/bin/guile",["--no-auto-compile","/gnu/store/rn7b0dq6iqfmmqyqzamix2mjmfygn31n-compile-modules"]

>> ,[("GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED","no")

>> ,("extensions","")

>> ,("module count","1")

>> ,("modules","/gnu/store/jsxgc979x79h81kzqz9n6cpf5pk4z262-module-import")

>> ,("optimization level","1")

>> ,("out","/gnu/store/j2r95mqfir1q6hsavm0r22k8z49nbvk1-module-import-compiled")

>> ,("preferLocalBuild","1")])

>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

>>

>> I guess you also have the same build-utils.scm. Don’t you?

>

> I've the exactly the same content in the file

> /gnu/store/ff107pg13nkarix7k9hgxxwx9cnn4602-module-import-compiled.drv

>

> [root@cluster24 ~]# cat /gnu/store/ff107pg13nkarix7k9hgxxwx9cnn4602-module-import-compiled.drv

> Derive([("out","/gnu/store/j2r95mqfir1q6hsavm0r22k8z49nbvk1-module-import-compiled","","")]

> ,[("/gnu/store/g08l2msvnivyi6x5nw52ak8n17sw9lzr-guile-bootstrap-2.0.drv",["out"])]

> ,["/gnu/store/jsxgc979x79h81kzqz9n6cpf5pk4z262-module-import","/gnu/store/l36kgiw25r2a4vllwad18jg8jnkvmzda-build-utils.scm","/gnu/store/rn7b0dq6iqfmmqyqzamix2mjmfygn31n-compile-modules"]

> ,"x86_64-linux","/gnu/store/lgi9x15a0w35mcpd7g1kb9274r6wy4pv-guile-bootstrap-2.0/bin/guile",["--no-auto-compile","/gnu/store/rn7b0dq6iqfmmqyqzamix2mjmfygn31n-compile-modules"]

> ,[("GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED","no")

> ,("extensions","")

> ,("module count","1")

> ,("modules","/gnu/store/jsxgc979x79h81kzqz9n6cpf5pk4z262-module-import")

> ,("optimization level","1"),("out","/gnu/store/j2r95mqfir1q6hsavm0r22k8z49nbvk1-module-import-compiled")

> ,("preferLocalBuild","1")])

>

> About the build-utils.scm, they are also identical:

>

> /root/.cache/guix/checkouts/pjmkglp4t7znuugeurpurzikxq3tnlaywmisyr27shj7apsnalwq/tests/build-utils.scm

> /NAS/home/fmenna/.cache/guix/checkouts/pjmkglp4t7znuugeurpurzikxq3tnlaywmisyr27shj7apsnalwq/tests/build-utils.scm

>

>> Therefore, I guess the difference is either an environment variable (the

>> list starting with GUILE_WARN_DEPRECATED) or the file

>> /gnu/store/…-qcompile-modules. Hum, it would be weird that it comes

>> from compile-modules…

>

>

>

>> Ah my train is at destination. To be continued… Let me know!

>>

>> Cheers,

>> simon

>>

>>

>> 1: Re: Derivations differ between computers?

>> zimoun<zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>

>> Fri, 26 Nov 2021 01:49:00 +0100

>> id:86lf1bspvn.fsf@gmail.com

>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2021-11

>> https://yhetil.org/guix/86lf1bspvn.fsf@gmail.cmo

>>

>> 2: Guix extension to display derivation (and rewrite fixed-output)

>> Simon Tournier<zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>

>> Fri, 12 Apr 2024 20:28:11 +0200

>> id:87ttk6phac.fsf@gmail.com

>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2024-04

>> https://yhetil.org/guix/87ttk6phac.fsf@gmail.com

>> c) Display the both derivations, as root and as regular user

>>

>> # guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

>

> [root@cluster24 ~]# guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

> /gnu/store/mbnrrqjizy3dvma9i3l8g5yvzi2p04ys-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv

>

>>

>> $ guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

>

> [fmenna@cluster24 ~]$  guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

> user with UID 255759 not found

> /gnu/store/mbnrrqjizy3dvma9i3l8g5yvzi2p04ys-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv

>

> I hope the message "user with UID 255759 not found" has nothing to do

> with the issue.

> Hi,

>

> Sorry for the late reply.

>

> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 at 14:03, Fabrice Tudoret <fabrice.tudoret@univ-rennes1.fr> wrote:

>

>>> c) Display the both derivations, as root and as regular user

>>>

>>> # guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

>> [root@cluster24 ~]# guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

>> /gnu/store/mbnrrqjizy3dvma9i3l8g5yvzi2p04ys-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv

>>

>>> $ guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

>> [fmenna@cluster24 ~]$  guix build -e '(@@ (gnu packages commencement) python-boot0)' -S -d

>> user with UID 255759 not found

>> /gnu/store/mbnrrqjizy3dvma9i3l8g5yvzi2p04ys-Python-3.5.9.tar.xz.drv

>>

>> I hope the message "user with UID 255759 not found" has nothing to do

>> with the issue.

> Well, this message comes from the Guix daemon (see nix-daemon.cc file):

>

> /* Open the store. */

> store = std::shared_ptr<StoreAPI>(new LocalStore(reserveSpace));

>

> if (userId != (uid_t) -1) {

> /* Create the user profile. */

> struct passwd *pw = getpwuid(userId);

> if (pw != NULL && pw->pw_name != NULL)

> store->createUser(pw->pw_name, userId);

> else

> printMsg(lvlInfo, format("user with UID %1% not found") % userId);

> }

>

>

> Hum, that’s not clear for me. The daemon is a beast… Maybe this has an

> impact. For sure, aside Guix, I think it would be better to fix it. :-)

>

> Well, I do not know why but this other message:

>

> > When I create the user home dir manually, the "guix pull" work's fine.

> > So the trouble could come from a disorder with the automatic home dir

> > creation.

>

> > I wish it's the right track. I keep digging.

>

> spots the light on UID. :-)

>

> Cheers,

> simon

>

> The storm is over and users no longer complain.