Request for merging "qt-team" branch

Hi! qt-team have this following updates:

- qt5 5.15.10 -> 5.15.15

- qt6 6.6.3 -> 6.7.2

- libvpx 1.12.0 -> 1.14.1

- abseil-cpp 20230802.1 -> 20240722.0

- add re2-next, icu4c-75, python-setuptools-scm-next

- qtconnectivity rename to qtconnectivity-5 and add qtconnectivity qt6

- qtcharts rename to qtcharts-5 and add qtcharts qt6

Hi Z572,

You're next in the merge queue according to the list [0], are you ready to merge?

Looks like a rebase is needed as QA is saying it can't process it:

I'm assuming this is partially why CI's substitutes available is so bad.

Steve / Futurile

[0] https://qa.guix.gnu.org/

Steve George <steve@futurile.net> writes:

The QA data service has processed the tip of qt-team, that's how it's

able to provide substitute information.

Also, looks like it's based on 3dc63f8ca7af8d4fee32a03c206b571896a3a70a

which is a few days old, so I'm guessing it was rebased a couple of days

ago.

The qa-frontpage has just finished canceling all the old builds that I

guess were submitted prior to the rebase, so hopefully some builds will

start happening soon.

I think CI has substitute availability comparable with master, which

seems good to me at least regarding the merge of qt-team, it's bordeaux

which is further behind.

On 11 Nov, Christopher Baines wrote:

(...)

Ah! thanks for the explanation Chris.

What's a reasonable level to wait for before a branch is merged? Master is at 96% on CI, and 92% on bordeaux right, so should we wait for the QT branch to get to the same point? And, is there a rule of thumb for the other architectures?

Steve

Steve George <steve@futurile.net> writes:

The other day I rebase to the latest commit, but qa doesn't seem to have

handled Merge base yet. and ci.guix's qt-team seems to work very slowly,

the submitted package will take a long time to start.

Hi,

Z572 <zhengjunjie@iscas.ac.cn> skribis:

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/qt-team is at 75% across all

architectures; for reference, ‘master’ is at 78% (meaning that x86 is

above 90% and aarch64 is very low).

I would say it’s enough to make an informed decision as to whether to

merge.

WDYT?

Thanks,

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

Yes, the other day I was waiting for bordeaux to build qt-team's aarch64 architecture.

Now I have pushed qt-team to master

Closed this issue.