Request for merging "fonts-split-outputs" branch

Done

Details

4 participants

Andreas Enge
???
Ludovic Courtès
Christopher Baines

Owner: unassigned

Submitted by: ???

Severity: normal

??? wrote on 2 Sep 12:27 +0200

Recipients:(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)

Message-ID:87jzful5a1.fsf@envs.net

I think the branch is ready once it built on CI.

From https://issues.guix.gnu.org/70496:

Hello, here are some patches for font packages which updates

the install phase in font-build-system for multiple outputs, and

use that for some font packages.

When a font family is provided in different formats (eg: both ttf and

otf), font picker will list duplicated entries. To remove those

duplicated entries, these patches will prefer "otf" over "ttf" files

by using '("out" "ttf")) as package's outputs field, so that otf files

will go into the default "out" output.

Andreas Enge wrote on 18 Sep 11:13 +0200

Problem with data service?

Recipients:(address . 72959@debbugs.gnu.org)(name . Christopher Baines)(address . mail@cbaines.net)

Message-ID:ZuqZoQgAvFaCHfgd@jurong

Hello,

QA says:

https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/fonts-split-outputs

"Failed to process target revision"

and the logs show a build failure in guile-ssh.

Is there a way to try a new evaluation?

Andreas

Christopher Baines wrote on 18 Sep 11:21 +0200

Recipients:(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)(address . 72959@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87ed5hwc4q.fsf@cbaines.net

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (9 lines)

> Hello,

> QA says:

> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/branch/fonts-split-outputs

> "Failed to process target revision"

> and the logs show a build failure in guile-ssh.

> Is there a way to try a new evaluation?

It's possible to ask the data service to retry, although in this case
I'd maybe rebase the branch, as that will make sure it's up to date as
well as having the data service retry processing it.

Andreas Enge wrote on 18 Sep 11:50 +0200

Recipients:(name . Christopher Baines)(address . mail@cbaines.net)(address . 72959@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:ZuqiWhZULDVuv4kN@jurong

Am Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:21:25AM +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines:

Toggle quote (4 lines)

> It's possible to ask the data service to retry, although in this case

> I'd maybe rebase the branch, as that will make sure it's up to date as

> well as having the data service retry processing it.

Good point, although the branch was not very outdated, it had been

rebased on September 2.

I have just rebased, but cannot force push.

So instead I have deleted the remote branch and pushed a new one.

Hopefully this will work with the QA machinery.

Andreas

Christopher Baines wrote on 18 Sep 12:25 +0200

Recipients:(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)(address . 72959@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:875xqtw957.fsf@cbaines.net

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (12 lines)> Am Wed, Sep 18, 2024 at 10:21:25AM +0100 schrieb Christopher Baines:
>> It's possible to ask the data service to retry, although in this case
>> I'd maybe rebase the branch, as that will make sure it's up to date as
>> well as having the data service retry processing it.
>
> Good point, although the branch was not very outdated, it had been
> rebased on September 2.
>
> I have just rebased, but cannot force push.
> So instead I have deleted the remote branch and pushed a new one.
> Hopefully this will work with the QA machinery.

Yep, that's fine, that's the way that all rebases have to be done.

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 2 Oct 19:07 +0200

Re: bug#72959: Request for merging "fonts-split-outputs" branch

Recipients:(name . ???)(address . iyzsong@envs.net)

Message-ID:87ldz6v3g4.fsf_-_@gnu.org

Hello!

Since ‘fonts-split-outputs’ is next in the merge queue at

https://qa.guix.gnu.org/ and not fully built yet at bordeaux.guix,

I created this jobset:

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs

Perhaps ??? you could rebase the branch and trigger a new evaluation

with:

wget --post-data="" -O/dev/null \

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs/hook/evaluate

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 7 Oct 14:32 +0200

Recipients:(name . ???)(address . iyzsong@envs.net)

Message-ID:87iku4xfd3.fsf_-_@gnu.org

Hello,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

Toggle quote (12 lines)> Since ‘fonts-split-outputs’ is next in the merge queue at
> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/> and not fully built yet at bordeaux.guix,
> I created this jobset:
>
>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs
>
> Perhaps ??? you could rebase the branch and trigger a new evaluation
> with:
>
>   wget --post-data="" -O/dev/null \
>     https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs/hook/evaluate

I went ahead and rebased the branch on top of

ff88c8cf3e2b8e3e86f438dd42adfce2db8dc337 and triggered a new evaluation.

Ludo’.

Christopher Baines wrote on 10 Oct 19:52 +0200

Recipients:(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)

Message-ID:87ed4nn8v1.fsf@cbaines.net

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

Toggle quote (17 lines)> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Since ‘fonts-split-outputs’ is next in the merge queue at
>> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/> and not fully built yet at bordeaux.guix,
>> I created this jobset:
>>
>>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs
>>
>> Perhaps ??? you could rebase the branch and trigger a new evaluation
>> with:
>>
>>   wget --post-data="" -O/dev/null \
>>     https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs/hook/evaluate
>
> I went ahead and rebased the branch on top of
> ff88c8cf3e2b8e3e86f438dd42adfce2db8dc337 and triggered a new evaluation.

Things have been building but QA hasn't quite submitted all the new
builds post rebase yet. This might be complicated by the lack of
issues.guix.gnu.org, once it's back though things will hopefully not
take too much longer to finish building.

Christopher Baines wrote on 14 Oct 12:51 +0200

Recipients:(name . ???)(address . iyzsong@envs.net)

Message-ID:87seszkldc.fsf@cbaines.net

Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> writes:

Toggle quote (24 lines)> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
>>
>>> Since ‘fonts-split-outputs’ is next in the merge queue at
>>> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/> and not fully built yet at bordeaux.guix,
>>> I created this jobset:
>>>
>>>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs
>>>
>>> Perhaps ??? you could rebase the branch and trigger a new evaluation
>>> with:
>>>
>>>   wget --post-data="" -O/dev/null \
>>>     https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs/hook/evaluate
>>
>> I went ahead and rebased the branch on top of
>> ff88c8cf3e2b8e3e86f438dd42adfce2db8dc337 and triggered a new evaluation.
>
> Things have been building but QA hasn't quite submitted all the new
> builds post rebase yet. This might be complicated by the lack of
> issues.guix.gnu.org, once it's back though things will hopefully not
> take too much longer to finish building.

The builds have been progressing. Substitute availability isn't quite as

high as master yet, and there are probably some flaky builds that'll

require more attempts to get substitutes, but it looks like this can be

merged this week.

I had a look at why x86_64-linux on ci.guix.gnu.org is a bit behind, and

some builds seem to be in the failed dependency state, but with no

failed dependency listed. Clicking the restart button does prompt that

thing to be built, but doesn't seem to unblock the builds on mass.

???, are you available to push this once it's ready?

Thanks,

Chris

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 14 Oct 13:48 +0200

Recipients:(name . Christopher Baines)(address . mail@cbaines.net)

Message-ID:87iktu3nxe.fsf@gnu.org

Hi Christopher,

Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:

Toggle quote (24 lines)> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
>>
>>> Since ‘fonts-split-outputs’ is next in the merge queue at
>>> <https://qa.guix.gnu.org/> and not fully built yet at bordeaux.guix,
>>> I created this jobset:
>>>
>>>   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs
>>>
>>> Perhaps ??? you could rebase the branch and trigger a new evaluation
>>> with:
>>>
>>>   wget --post-data="" -O/dev/null \
>>>     https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs/hook/evaluate
>>
>> I went ahead and rebased the branch on top of
>> ff88c8cf3e2b8e3e86f438dd42adfce2db8dc337 and triggered a new evaluation.
>
> Things have been building but QA hasn't quite submitted all the new
> builds post rebase yet. This might be complicated by the lack of
> issues.guix.gnu.org, once it's back though things will hopefully not
> take too much longer to finish building.

Yeah. FWIW we’re at 64% successfully built at

https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/fonts-split-outputs.

It’ll still be some time before AArch64 builds even start (20% still

queued), though perhaps we shouldn’t wait for it.

Ludo’.

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 15 Oct 17:40 +0200

Recipients:(name . Christopher Baines)(address . mail@cbaines.net)

Message-ID:875xptxtm6.fsf@gnu.org

Hello,

Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net> skribis:

Toggle quote (5 lines)

> The builds have been progressing. Substitute availability isn't quite as

> high as master yet, and there are probably some flaky builds that'll

> require more attempts to get substitutes, but it looks like this can be

> merged this week.

Yay, good.

Toggle quote (5 lines)

> I had a look at why x86_64-linux on ci.guix.gnu.org is a bit behind, and

> some builds seem to be in the failed dependency state, but with no

> failed dependency listed. Clicking the restart button does prompt that

> thing to be built, but doesn't seem to unblock the builds on mass.

Right, I broke that with recent changes to Cuirass (I even wrote tests

that happen to not test the right thing…).

Toggle quote (2 lines)

> ???, are you available to push this once it's ready?

If not, we can probably do it on their behalf, in an effort to move

forward.

Thanks,

Ludo’.

Andreas Enge wrote 5 days ago

Advance in queue

Recipients:(address . 73288@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:ZxPFpShNRuz1kyjk@jurong

Hello,

I have just pushed the fonts-split-outputs branch, which had been built

on QA, after rebasing it on master.

Now I have rebased mesa-updates on the (new) master branch and pushed it;

normally it should be picked up and built automatically by QA.

Thanks to you all for your patience!

Andreas

Closed

Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 72959@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it

mumi current 72959

Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)

mumi am -- -s

Or, compose a reply to this issue

mumi compose

Or, send patches to this issue

mumi send-email *.patch

is:open	open issues
is:done	closed issues
submitter:<who>	search issue submitter
author:<who>	search by message author
date:yesterday..now	search by issue date
mdate:3m..2d	search by message date