guix import crate misses dependencies

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Carlo Zancanaro
  • Nathan Dehnel
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Nathan Dehnel
Severity
normal
N
N
Nathan Dehnel wrote on 26 Feb 01:12 +0100
(name . bug-guix)(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
CAEEhgEtcOZ1Fi8uG0EENfWTvjt2oPy3KRNuMzO0Q-3c9s6Znfw@mail.gmail.com
Run for example: guix import crate -r --recursive-dev-dependencies -
-allow-yanked egui_dock@0.11
this will import a bunch of packages that require rust-bytemuck-1 as a
dependency, but it will not be included, and must be imported
separately.

guix 313458c
C
C
Carlo Zancanaro wrote on 26 Feb 01:46 +0100
(name . Nathan Dehnel)(address . ncdehnel@gmail.com)(address . 69397@debbugs.gnu.org)
87wmqsnjcm.fsf@zancanaro.id.au
Hi Nathan,

I just tried running your example:

On Sun, Feb 25 2024, Nathan Dehnel wrote:
Toggle quote (2 lines)
> guix import crate -r --recursive-dev-dependencies --allow-yanked egui_dock@0.11

I saw that rust-bytemuck-1 was included as an input in lots of packages,
as you said. However, I also noticed that bytemuck is present in
Guix. "guix edit rust-bytemuck" opened gnu/packages/crates-io.scm which
defines the rust-bytemuck-1 variable to a package for rust-bytemuck.

Rather than importing bytemuck separately, it should be enough to add
(use-modules (gnu packages crates-io)) at the top of your scheme file to
bring the Guix definition in.

Carlo
N
N
Nathan Dehnel wrote on 26 Feb 03:21 +0100
(name . Carlo Zancanaro)(address . carlo@zancanaro.id.au)(address . 69397@debbugs.gnu.org)
CAEEhgEuWPnrqG+jkakqys8_jgroucnV71qKQmmcY4fQVeVT06g@mail.gmail.com
Oh, my bad. Yeah, I just had my modules wrong. Thanks.

On Sun, Feb 25, 2024 at 6:46?PM Carlo Zancanaro <carlo@zancanaro.id.au> wrote:
Toggle quote (18 lines)
>
> Hi Nathan,
>
> I just tried running your example:
>
> On Sun, Feb 25 2024, Nathan Dehnel wrote:
> > guix import crate -r --recursive-dev-dependencies --allow-yanked egui_dock@0.11
>
> I saw that rust-bytemuck-1 was included as an input in lots of packages,
> as you said. However, I also noticed that bytemuck is present in
> Guix. "guix edit rust-bytemuck" opened gnu/packages/crates-io.scm which
> defines the rust-bytemuck-1 variable to a package for rust-bytemuck.
>
> Rather than importing bytemuck separately, it should be enough to add
> (use-modules (gnu packages crates-io)) at the top of your scheme file to
> bring the Guix definition in.
>
> Carlo
?