archivebox: Failed to build

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
One participant
  • Sharlatan Hellseher
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Sharlatan Hellseher
Severity
normal
S
S
Sharlatan Hellseher wrote on 18 Feb 22:15 +0100
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)(name . Pradana AUMARS)(address . paumars@courrier.dev)
87r0h9jwxw.fsf@gmail.com
Hi Guix!

While reviewing https://issues.guix.gnu.org/68491and working on minor
adjustments in:

* 2f1ed825af * gnu: python-simpervisor: Enable tests.
* 8cab6bac1c * gnu: python-simpervisor: Update to 1.0.0.
* 4da2f179d2 * gnu: python-devtools: Update to 0.12.2, fix build.
* ccbf143927 * gnu: python-watchdog: Simplify package.
* 18240ae446 * gnu: python-humanize: Update to 4.0.0.
* 4daeae8583 * gnu: python-trio-websocket: Simplify package.
* 1a2c374c2c * gnu: python-xyzservices: Simplify package.
* e355848578 * gnu: python-zeroconf: Simplify package.
* eeaad8c906 * gnu: python-crontab: Update to 3.0.0.
* 170efe6e68 * gnu: python-crontab: Enable tests.

I've found that archivebox is failed to build for a long time due to
issue with python-django-3.1.14.


Toggle snippet (5 lines)
build of /gnu/store/mcdbyv6vgfxv7ppk1jkcpvrzq6pbfgrr-python-django-3.1.14.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/mc/dbyv6vgfxv7ppk1jkcpvrzq6pbfgrr-python-django-3.1.14.drv.gz'.
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/n2ja2mmvd2ly0q8qxc3wvcp0qd0xqbvq-archivebox-0.6.2.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built

It was added 2y ago by Pradana AUMARS <paumars@courrier.dev> and never
updated since that time.

Maybe someone would like to volunteer to fix it ;-).

Thanks,
Oleg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=dLbP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 69258@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 69258
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch