guix pull bug

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Josselin Poiret
  • Ryan Barber
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Ryan Barber
Severity
normal
R
R
Ryan Barber wrote on 14 Feb 17:26 +0100
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
CAC1NScLbPucNkg7gu31=hOxQCRrzL9sOeG9U20a0D19i+tBiPQ@mail.gmail.com
guix pull requested I send over this bug report. fresh debian bookworm
install as a vm in google cloud. guix installed via apt. vm has minimal
specs - 1gb ram, single core, which might be the issue.

-Ryan

rfb@home-shell:~$ guix pull
Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at '
Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to 0c3ae6d (9 new commits)...
Building from this channel:
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://bordeaux.guix.gnu.org'...
100.0%
building
/gnu/store/35nlr0rsqyqaajaw2ikkf2k8h1izrckk-compute-guix-derivation.drv...
Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... \guix pull: error: You
found a bug: the program
'/gnu/store/5cb67fjrfzsnl8np6xgg2g62zx36h45h-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
"0c3ae6dc84fa7d12020983a42802346638be66bc"; system: "x86_64-linux";
host version: "1.4.0"; pull-version: 1).
Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.

rfb@home-shell:~$ uname -a
Linux home-shell.c.home-381917.internal 6.1.0-18-cloud-amd64 #1 SMP
PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.76-1 (2024-02-01) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Attachment: file
J
J
Josselin Poiret wrote on 15 Feb 12:02 +0100
87wmr6at2h.fsf@jpoiret.xyz
Hi Ryan
Ryan Barber <rfb@skyscraper.nu> writes:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> guix pull requested I send over this bug report. fresh debian bookworm
> install as a vm in google cloud. guix installed via apt. vm has minimal
> specs - 1gb ram, single core, which might be the issue.

That's most likely it, `guix pull` requires quite a lot of RAM
unfortunately. It's something everyone would like to fix but it
requires a non-trivial amount of work that no-one has committed to for
now :(

Best,
--
Josselin Poiret
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQHEBAEBCAAuFiEEOSSM2EHGPMM23K8vUF5AuRYXGooFAmXN71YQHGRldkBqcG9p
cmV0Lnh5egAKCRBQXkC5FhcairRdC/4wmS+5vPvS8a/RlTgnZwqFpnzqzzv0nERz
2bkuBqXH2oz1CIuTlWfGGryaClt86DyoXbiOy+faB6gtmUrU0rytsPmOvz+KT2ak
bB3UZM9Rtn2UvXCR8IlOF806YGE+PsP6wRTAN/sfhMwLMkHXMFYeO7/hq8nSdj5t
aUIX0fwieEZ1zBwKZ7zWpxRGVIBUPQvsERIhV0uBwbNPgk3eFj/GRDbralQhWWOj
OhALlkN1cv7+TYUbsqcZF1GLFDXVmI7sIuklHW8rF5Lm+QZ743O6gtFwfHo151PX
3+4WSkCtqXuUHXTGTYvjUKgRXH/0/i+e7mQSiRXnHNcC4e4neH8O6mRq8TdzbIQT
O9oR4W1m1JSL/gz/RZEqA1kJoRYX2YLZ7nhltrI6bYhmql/qND59UCJw3dSQDAZI
YDXe+4OE0MlKY3tYhyOpCRO5o27rvPttH/CJrqCm8pWiALkFJ8Tn/rSvMcr5lLvY
T7besWsJEIb6JmYC1yMyVqU8LVvBmu0=
=KHDm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 69127@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 69127
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch