Am Freitag, dem 26.01.2024 um 16:16 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer:
Toggle quote (74 lines)
> Hi,
>
> Vivien Kraus <vivien@planete-kraus.eu> writes:
>
> > The categories are from the meta-packages in the
> > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta repository.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (gnome) [propagated-inputs]: Add gnome-
> > connections and gnome-remote-desktop. Add GNOME-Core-Developer-
> > Tools section
> > with dconf-editor, devhelp, d-spy, gnome-boxes, gnome-builder,
> > sysprof. Add GNOME-Core-Mobile section with calls.
> >
> > Change-Id: I218cf0c3c4d52d9f611275737accb0f723fe94b5
> > ---
> > Dear guix,
> >
> > I crawled https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-build-meta and I
> > think now we have the core applications in the correct section (and
> > yes, gnome-remote-desktop is one!). That’s quite a lot of
> > applications, but maybe it’s OK. What do you think? Regarding i686-
> > linux, gnome-shell depends on gjs and thus rust, so I’m not sure
> > there’s anything to save.
>
> Thanks for doing so!
>
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Vivien
> >
> > gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 11 +++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> > index 3d89f06d6a..fdc903d48d 100644
> > --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> > +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm
> > @@ -10145,6 +10145,15 @@ (define-public gnome
> > (list eog)
> > '())
> > ,@(list
> > + ;; GNOME-Core-Developer-Tools.
> > + dconf-editor
> > + devhelp
> > + d-spy
> > + gnome-boxes
> > + gnome-builder
> > + sysprof
> > + ;; GNOME-Core-Mobile.
> > + calls
> > ;; GNOME-Core-OS-Services.
> > accountsservice
> > network-manager
> > @@ -10162,6 +10171,7 @@ (define-public gnome
> > gnome-initial-setup
> > gnome-keyring
> > gnome-menus
> > + gnome-remote-desktop
> > gnome-session
> > gnome-settings-daemon
> > gnome-shell
> > @@ -10185,6 +10195,7 @@ (define-public gnome
> > gnome-calendar
> > gnome-characters
> > gnome-clocks
> > + gnome-connections
> > gnome-console
> > gnome-contacts
> > gnome-disk-utility
>
> I think that's fine for now, and the RFC from Liliana looks great as
> well, so the above could be used as the legacy meta-package (I assume
> they are part of Liliana's new categorized lists of default GNOME
> packages that can be configured).
I skipped the optional bits (developer tools + calls), as they're a
rather mixed bag. We should probably add the other two, however.
Cheers