Should 'guix pack', 'install', &c. accept '--file'?

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Maxim Cournoyer
  • Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
  • Simon Tournier
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Severity
normal

Debbugs page

Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote 1 years ago
Should 'guix pack', 'install', ... accept '-f'?
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
D3539F93-5C69-4463-9A80-0AB2479D2FA6@tobias.gr
Hi all,

I feel like that everything that could build a package should accept the 'standard build options' like -f.

Does anyone have arguments against it?

Kind regards,

T G-R

Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote 1 years ago
(no subject)
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
925c3944e5f738acaeae2adb6c5a0080@tobias.gr
retitle 66653 Should 'guix pack', 'install', &c. accept '--file'?
thanks

(-f is unfortunately already overloaded)
Simon Tournier wrote 1 years ago
Re: bug#66653: Should 'guix pack', 'install', ... accept '-f'?
(name . Tobias Geerinckx-Rice)(address . me@tobias.gr)(address . 66653@debbugs.gnu.org)
87fs21jv1s.fsf@gmail.com
Hi,

On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 18:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> wrote:

Toggle quote (5 lines)
> I feel like that everything that could build a package should accept
> the 'standard build options' like -f.
>
> Does anyone have arguments against it?

No arguments against it. :-)

Cheers,
simon
Maxim Cournoyer wrote 1 years ago
Re: bug#66653: Should 'guix pack', 'install', &c. accept '--file'?
(name . Simon Tournier)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)(name . Tobias Geerinckx-Rice)(address . me@tobias.gr)(address . 66653@debbugs.gnu.org)
87lebs3wv8.fsf_-_@gmail.com
Hi Tobias,

Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

Toggle quote (12 lines)
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 at 18:18, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice via Bug reports
> for GNU Guix <bug-guix@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> I feel like that everything that could build a package should accept
>> the 'standard build options' like -f.
>>
>> Does anyone have arguments against it?
>
> No arguments against it. :-)

Neither from me.

--
Thanks,
Maxim
?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 66653@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 66653
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch
You may also tag this issue. See list of standard tags. For example, to set the confirmed and easy tags
mumi command -t +confirmed -t +easy
Or, remove the moreinfo tag and set the help tag
mumi command -t -moreinfo -t +help