(name . guix-patches)(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)
87o7hh3tkd.fsf@gmail.com
Hello,
I think this branch should be fine to merge. Let's see what QA thinks
of it.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Request for merging "qt-team" branch
- Done
Details
- 2 participants
- Ludovic Courtès
- Maxim Cournoyer
- Owner
- unassigned
- Submitted by
- Maxim Cournoyer
- Severity
- normal
M
L
(name . Maxim Cournoyer)(address . maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com)(address . 66311@debbugs.gnu.org)
87wmvqikol.fsf@gnu.org
Hi!
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
Toggle quote (3 lines)
> I think this branch should be fine to merge. Let's see what QA thinks
> of it.
Now fully built on ci.guix, with a 72% success rate (73% on current
‘master’):
Ludo’.
M
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 66311@debbugs.gnu.org)
878r855r65.fsf@gmail.com
Hi Ludo!
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
Toggle quote (12 lines)
> Hi!
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> I think this branch should be fine to merge. Let's see what QA thinks
>> of it.
>
> Now fully built on ci.guix, with a 72% success rate (73% on current
> ‘master’):
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/latest/dashboard?spec=qt-team
Thanks for the heads-up! I hoped to be able to have qtbase built for
aarch64, but it keeps failing for reasons. The last one is:
Toggle snippet (6 lines)
Substitute:
substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 0.0%
substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 100.0%
cannot build missing derivation ?/gnu/store/xwapll8g23f43j2h2l21csnqq4nizy7h-qtbase-5.15.10.drv?
Which is our longstanding bug #54447. Previously it had been canceled
for reasons I ignore.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
L
(name . Maxim Cournoyer)(address . maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com)(address . 66311@debbugs.gnu.org)
87lec5axwg.fsf@gnu.org
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
Toggle quote (26 lines)
> Hi Ludo!
>
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
>>
>>> I think this branch should be fine to merge. Let's see what QA thinks
>>> of it.
>>
>> Now fully built on ci.guix, with a 72% success rate (73% on current
>> ‘master’):
>>
>> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/eval/latest/dashboard?spec=qt-team
>
> Thanks for the heads-up! I hoped to be able to have qtbase built for
> aarch64, but it keeps failing for reasons. The last one is:
>
> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2186594/log/raw
>
> Substitute:
> substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 0.0%
> substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 100.0%
> cannot build missing derivation ?/gnu/store/xwapll8g23f43j2h2l21csnqq4nizy7h-qtbase-5.15.10.drv?
Restarted now…
Ludo’.
M
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 66311-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87jzrmy4q8.fsf_-_@gmail.com
Hi,
[...]
Toggle quote (10 lines)
>> Thanks for the heads-up! I hoped to be able to have qtbase built for
>> aarch64, but it keeps failing for reasons. The last one is:
>>
>> https://ci.guix.gnu.org/build/2186594/log/raw
>>
>> Substitute:
>> substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 0.0%
>> substitute: [Kupdating substitutes from 'http://10.0.0.1'... 100.0%
>> cannot build missing derivation ?/gnu/store/xwapll8g23f43j2h2l21csnqq4nizy7h-qtbase-5.15.10.drv?
It's been scheduled for nearly 2 days. I've now pushed the series.
--
Thanks,
Maxim
Closed
?