Cuirass Compute Guix Derivation Bug

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Karl G. Hallsby
  • Maxim Cournoyer
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Karl G. Hallsby
Severity
normal

Debbugs page

Karl G. Hallsby wrote 2 years ago
(name . Guix Bugs)(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
87pm355nrn.fsf@hallsby.com
This error occurred on a Cuirass system using guix 4dfdd82 on a Guile
project.
Maxim Cournoyer wrote 1 years ago
(name . Karl G. Hallsby)(address . karl@hallsby.com)(address . 65606@debbugs.gnu.org)
87a5r5853f.fsf@gmail.com
Hello,

"Karl G. Hallsby" <karl@hallsby.com> writes:

Toggle quote (47 lines)
> fetching path `/gnu/store/rlbyjwc1kmhwr4y3a0m31wd37l0ll024-po4a-0.69'...
> Downloading https://ci.guix.gnu.org/nar/lzip/rlbyjwc1kmhwr4y3a0m31wd37l0ll024-po4a-0.69...

> [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 0B/s 00:00 ? ? 0.0%
> [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 1.6MiB/s 00:00 ?? ? 3.1%
> [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 215KiB/s 00:01 ?? ? 6.2%
> [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 67KiB/s 00:03 ??? ? 9.3%
> [K po4a-0.69 2.0MiB 66KiB/s 00:04 ???? ? 12.4%Backtrace:
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1752:10 19 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
> In cuirass/scripts/evaluate.scm:
> 99:7 18 (_)
> 105:27 17 (thunk)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1752:10 16 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
> In guix/store.scm:
> 659:37 15 (thunk)
> 2168:25 14 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0> ?)
> In cuirass/scripts/evaluate.scm:
> 85:6 13 (_ _)
> In guix/channels.scm:
> 982:2 12 (_ _)
> 924:2 11 (_ _)
> In guix/monads.scm:
> 487:9 10 (_ _)
> In guix/store.scm:
> 1996:8 9 (_ _)
> In guix/channels.scm:
> 675:14 8 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0>)
> In guix/store.scm:
> 2168:25 7 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0> ?)
> 1298:8 6 (call-with-build-handler _ _)
> 1298:8 5 (call-with-build-handler #<procedure 7fab6e7dd8d8 at g?> ?)
> In guix/channels.scm:
> 690:14 4 (_)
> In guix/store.scm:
> 2168:25 3 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7fab6d89dfa0> ?)
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 191:27 2 (_ #(#(#<directory (build-self) 7fab6d8635a0> #<pr?>) ?))
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
> 1685:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
> 1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)

> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> ERROR:
> 1. &message: "You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/cxb9kcppq32jvjq3sqld84v2fj1k8hgi-compute-guix-derivation'\nfailed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: \"74d72046bdc1ed6c859565570d0db58d20c9ddd7\"; system: \"x86_64-linux\";\nhost version: \"1.4.0-10.4dfdd82\"; pull-version: 1).\nPlease report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.\n"

The problem occurred while downloading a substitute, so it seems to be a
bug in 'guix substitute'. Perhaps related to a network problem that was
not correctly handled. The backtrace is not super useful... I wonder
how we could change that.

--
Thanks,
Maxim
Karl G. Hallsby wrote 1 years ago
(name . Maxim Cournoyer)(address . maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com)(address . 65606@debbugs.gnu.org)
87leapgjrf.fsf@hallsby.com
Toggle quote (4 lines)
> The problem occurred while downloading a substitute, so it seems to be a
> bug in 'guix substitute'. Perhaps related to a network problem that was
> not correctly handled.

That might be it. I have completely forgotten what this submission was
about or how I hit it. The only other pieces of information I can
provide is that Cuirass instance is running in a VM on Proxmox and that
I am using the default build mode with the local daemon. This machine is
CI for my personal projects and channels, so a single machine is enough
for building those.

I think this was a transient issue. Doing a "herd restart cuirass" fixed
it, I think.

I have not seen this issue again, though I have seen others with
Cuirass. These new issues do not belong in this thread though.

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> The backtrace is not super useful... I wonder how we could change
> that.

Getting better backtraces for Cuirass-issued Guix commands would be
amazing! There are some instances, like this one, where the backtrace
does not help much.

--
Raven Hallsby
?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 65606@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 65606
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch
You may also tag this issue. See list of standard tags. For example, to set the confirmed and easy tags
mumi command -t +confirmed -t +easy
Or, remove the moreinfo tag and set the help tag
mumi command -t -moreinfo -t +help