Guix system entirely broken by updating second runc or by accidental hard reset

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • Steven Roose
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Steven Roose
Severity
normal
S
S
Steven Roose wrote on 13 Jun 2023 04:25
Guix system entirely broken by updating second runc or by accidental hard reset
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
FA78DB4C-DF5A-4134-8CEE-D71867760C62@roose.io
I'm writing this from my phone after a 3 hour attempt to fix my Guix system without success, it seems totally FUBAR.

So here is what I did:

$ guix package -I runc

Shortly after, my battery ran out and my laptop did a hard reset (yes trying to configure hibernate on low battery has been on my todo list for a while). I think the above command already finished when it reset, but I'm not entirely sure. It's been some hours.

So the current situation is this:

* All GUI apps I tried give "command not found", hence no Firefox or Thunderbird.
* My ~/.guix-profile/manifest is empty. Meaning that all guix package commands done in this profile give "unsupported manifest format".
* Idk if this is normal, but listing profiles as my regular user lists two profiles: ~/.guix-profile and ~/.config/guix/current.

I tried various things:

* editing PATH to remove my user profile (thinking this might use another runc)
* running guix package -r from a root bash using the --profile= flag for the broken profile: same manifest error. When doing this for the ~/.config/guix/current profile, it says no runc found.
* guix pull, reconfigure and reboot from root
* asking for help on IRC (weechat works yay)

I'm kinda hopeless. I can't do anything productive.

If I should post this in a forum instead of here, feel free to forward me.
Attachment: file
S
S
Steven Roose wrote on 13 Jun 2023 19:02
Re: bug#64031: Acknowledgement (Guix system entirely broken by updating second runc or by accidental hard reset)
(address . 64031@debbugs.gnu.org)
b1bbf3a2-5682-57eb-ffee-88a37d4d032f@roose.io
I figured if my current profile is broken, somehow I should fix it or
roll it back. I also figure reinstalling my system won't work if I keep
my home directory.

I also still don't understand why I have two different profiles and I
don't know what is the different between profiles and whatever `guix
home` does.

But I tried some things:


$ guix home roll-back
guix home: error: cannot switch to home environment generation '-1'


$ guix home list-generations
Backtrace:
           7 (primitive-load "/home/steven/.config/guix/current/bin/…")
In guix/ui.scm:
   2300:7  6 (run-guix . _)
  2263:10  5 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1752:10  4 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In guix/status.scm:
    859:3  3 (_)
    839:4  2 (call-with-status-report _ _)
In unknown file:
           1 (raise #<&profile-not-found-error profile: "/var/guix/p…>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
  1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)

ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #<&profile-not-found-error
profile: "/var/guix/profiles/per-user/steven/guix-home">


$ guix home describe
guix home: error: no home environment generation, nothing to describe


So I guess I'm not using `guix home`.


Just to help me move forward, is there a summary on what profiles
actually are? Because they are separate from the guix system packages
that it also seems separate from guix home.

On 6/13/23 03:26, GNU bug Tracking System wrote:
Toggle quote (17 lines)
> Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.
>
> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
> has been received.
>
> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
>
> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
> bug-guix@gnu.org
>
> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
> send it to 64031@debbugs.gnu.org.
>
> Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@gnu.org unless you wish
> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>
S
S
Steven Roose wrote on 13 Jun 2023 19:24
(address . 64031@debbugs.gnu.org)
536795e0-d29a-04e5-2437-713bc0a1b055@roose.io
Ok, I don't know how to close this issue, but I managed to fix it with
guix package --roll-back. I took me so long to find that possibility
because both `guix system` and `guix home` have a `roll-back` *command*
while in packages it's a flag. I thought it was for individual packages
maybe.

I don't know how to close issues here, but someone feel free to close this.

On 6/13/23 18:02, Steven Roose wrote:
Toggle quote (65 lines)
> I figured if my current profile is broken, somehow I should fix it or
> roll it back. I also figure reinstalling my system won't work if I
> keep my home directory.
>
> I also still don't understand why I have two different profiles and I
> don't know what is the different between profiles and whatever `guix
> home` does.
>
> But I tried some things:
>
>
> $ guix home roll-back
> guix home: error: cannot switch to home environment generation '-1'
>
>
> $ guix home list-generations
> Backtrace:
>            7 (primitive-load "/home/steven/.config/guix/current/bin/…")
> In guix/ui.scm:
>    2300:7  6 (run-guix . _)
>   2263:10  5 (run-guix-command _ . _)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1752:10  4 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
> In guix/status.scm:
>     859:3  3 (_)
>     839:4  2 (call-with-status-report _ _)
> In unknown file:
>            1 (raise #<&profile-not-found-error profile: "/var/guix/p…>)
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>   1685:16  0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
>
> ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
> Wrong type (expecting exact integer): #<&profile-not-found-error
> profile: "/var/guix/profiles/per-user/steven/guix-home">
>
>
> $ guix home describe
> guix home: error: no home environment generation, nothing to describe
>
>
> So I guess I'm not using `guix home`.
>
>
> Just to help me move forward, is there a summary on what profiles
> actually are? Because they are separate from the guix system packages
> that it also seems separate from guix home.
>
> On 6/13/23 03:26, GNU bug Tracking System wrote:
>> Thank you for filing a new bug report with debbugs.gnu.org.
>>
>> This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
>> has been received.
>>
>> Your message is being forwarded to the package maintainers and other
>> interested parties for their attention; they will reply in due course.
>>
>> Your message has been sent to the package maintainer(s):
>>   bug-guix@gnu.org
>>
>> If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
>> send it to 64031@debbugs.gnu.org.
>>
>> Please do not send mail to help-debbugs@gnu.org unless you wish
>> to report a problem with the Bug-tracking system.
>>
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 15 Jun 2023 17:55
Re: bug#64031: Guix system entirely broken by updating second runc or by accidental hard reset
(name . Steven Roose)(address . steven@roose.io)(address . 64031-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87sfasvhxt.fsf_-_@gnu.org
Steven Roose <steven@roose.io> skribis:

Toggle quote (8 lines)
> Ok, I don't know how to close this issue, but I managed to fix it with
> guix package --roll-back. I took me so long to find that possibility
> because both `guix system` and `guix home` have a `roll-back`
> *command* while in packages it's a flag. I thought it was for
> individual packages maybe.
>
> I don't know how to close issues here, but someone feel free to close this.

Hi! Glad you found the explanation and solution.

I’m closing by emailing to 64031-done.

Thanks,
Ludo’.
Closed
?