(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
87fsdxzoqq.fsf@pelzflorian.de
Having installed the 1.4.0rc1 installer image: After guix pull, it
failed to reconfigure, because master is an unrelated commit.
Regards,
Florian
[version 1.4.0rc1] reconfigure fails
- Done
Details
- 3 participants
- Ludovic Courtès
- Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
- pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
- Owner
- unassigned
- Submitted by
- pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
- Severity
- normal
- Merged with
P
T
(name . pelzflorian (Florian Pelz))(address . pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de)
87mt85y8lj.fsf@nckx
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) ???
Toggle quote (4 lines)
> Having installed the 1.4.0rc1 installer image: After guix pull,
> it
> failed to reconfigure, because master is an unrelated commit.
Hah. This should indeed be mentioned in calls for -RC testing,
but probably doesn't deserve a bug report, since there's no bug.
WDYT?
Kind regards,
T G-R
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCY4pA+A0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15XRMBALT5uhyfy88ZCuoqJILwgyIeqfvyneyN2CF2KU5n
hjYcAP9E5lV908Y3CBhCC/IZRsDRKVRub/C21GxEhKuOajN+Bw==
=lcin
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
P
(name . Tobias Geerinckx-Rice)(address . me@tobias.gr)(address . 59780@debbugs.gnu.org)
875yet38qf.fsf@pelzflorian.de
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> writes:
Toggle quote (7 lines)
> pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) ???
>> Having installed the 1.4.0rc1 installer image: After guix pull, it
>> failed to reconfigure, because master is an unrelated commit.
>
> Hah. This should indeed be mentioned in calls for -RC testing, but
> probably doesn't deserve a bug report, since there's no bug. WDYT?
Huh I don’t understand. :) Had this been the 1.4.0 release, reconfigure
would be impossible, unless --allow-downgrades. Is the actual release
commit always on master; do I overlook something? Then feel free to
close.
Regards,
Florian
T
(name . pelzflorian (Florian Pelz))(address . pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de)(address . 59780@debbugs.gnu.org)
875yety2uw.fsf@nckx
Hi'gain,
pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) ???
Toggle quote (4 lines)
> Huh I don’t understand. :) Had this been the 1.4.0 release,
> reconfigure
> would be impossible, unless --allow-downgrades.
I don't follow. Could you explain?
Toggle quote (2 lines)
> Is the actual release commit always on master
Yes. Does this cancel out the previous question? If so, I'll let
you close the bug to avoid misunderstandings.
(But it's worth noting in future calls for testing, absolutely!
Thanks for noticing.)
Kind regards,
T G-R
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCY4peBw0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15VEAA/R808FJBNtW/C0ZQ4ghSIqnnyQ5U76gqNFLaUkjX
WDHAAP4nTga1bZgGJBNnei5M+eKZGi6XDawxDF4rrTWoLG4WCA==
=O9a8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
T
(name . pelzflorian (Florian Pelz))(address . pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de)(address . 59780@debbugs.gnu.org)
871qphy2q2.fsf@nckx
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice ???
Toggle quote (4 lines)
>> Is the actual release commit always on master
>
> Yes.
Actually, that is what's known as ‘complete nonsense’ and the
correct answer is, of course, ‘no’.
Hmm. I'll have to actually test the RC to see what you mean.
Sorry for the noise.
Kind regs,
T G-R
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCY4petQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15T2UA/3hHLrljpk2ohH7/iCXTkDkWBG1Tq9CLLy09jl2S
rm9zAP0Z7ZGBGji/df3xH7W0JmNhICybBGHdGByKQi21/b42Ag==
=47sC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
T
Re: bug#59830: guix system reconfigure do n't work after 1.4_rc1 fresh installation
A141AB1E-AF1D-4370-95DF-95BACEE92D09@tobias.gr
merge 59830 59780
thanks
Kind regards,
T G-R
Sent on the go. Excuse or enjoy my brevity.
L
Re: bug#59780: [version 1.4.0rc1] reconfigure fails
(name . pelzflorian (Florian Pelz))(address . pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de)
87bkohrjfx.fsf@gnu.org
"pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de> skribis:
Toggle quote (11 lines)
> Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr> writes:
>> pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) ???
>>> Having installed the 1.4.0rc1 installer image: After guix pull, it
>>> failed to reconfigure, because master is an unrelated commit.
>>
>> Hah. This should indeed be mentioned in calls for -RC testing, but
>> probably doesn't deserve a bug report, since there's no bug. WDYT?
>
> Huh I don’t understand. :) Had this been the 1.4.0 release, reconfigure
> would be impossible, unless --allow-downgrades.
Right. This is fixed by commit
7fde16671523f3fc3bda0c07a47a1fa33f8675b1, which merges ‘version-1.4.0’
into ‘master’.
This is something we’ll have to do after the actual release too.
Thanks for the heads-up!
Ludo’.
Closed
?