ESP partition uses 1024 byte sectors

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
One participant
  • Efraim Flashner
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Efraim Flashner
Severity
normal
E
E
Efraim Flashner wrote on 29 Nov 2022 21:51
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
Y4Zw3gQWuqtEQ7Py@3900XT
I was working on using a grub-efi system image for aarch64 and I got the
following error:
'Error: FAT sector size mismatch (fs=1024, dev=512)'
I traced it back to u-boot¹. u-boot wouldn't chainload grub if the
device block size and the filesystem sector size doesn't line up. I
changed the line in (gnu build image) in make-vfat-image to use '-S 512'
for esp partitions and was able to load the grub menu from u-boot.

I spent some time looking through the git history but I wasn't able to
find anything to suggest why we have 1024 byte sectors there
specifically.


--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> ????? ?????
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=duo/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


E
E
Efraim Flashner wrote on 1 Dec 2022 09:24
(address . 59695@debbugs.gnu.org)
Y4hksd7ae7PPiZUd@3900XT
On Tue, Nov 29, 2022 at 10:51:42PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
Toggle quote (14 lines)
> I was working on using a grub-efi system image for aarch64 and I got the
> following error:
> 'Error: FAT sector size mismatch (fs=1024, dev=512)'
> I traced it back to u-boot¹. u-boot wouldn't chainload grub if the
> device block size and the filesystem sector size doesn't line up. I
> changed the line in (gnu build image) in make-vfat-image to use '-S 512'
> for esp partitions and was able to load the grub menu from u-boot.
>
> I spent some time looking through the git history but I wasn't able to
> find anything to suggest why we have 1024 byte sectors there
> specifically.
>
> ¹ https://source.denx.de/u-boot/u-boot/-/blob/master/fs/fat/fat.c#L589

Normally I'd be ok with hardcoding 512 for the sector size to fix this,
but then I remembered that there are 4k block size disks which actually
declare themselves as having 4k blocks and not emulating 512 byte
blocks.

What do you think? I suppose one option would be to patch u-boot to not
demand they be equal, but that only works with guix build u-boot. We
could force 512, u-boot is the only thing I've come across so far that
cares and most people² use µSD cards which advertise 512 byte blocks.

Maybe change it to 512 and add a TODO to revisit it later as needed?

² citation needed

--
Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> ????? ?????
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=HJNi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


?
Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 59695@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 59695
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch