`guix pull` fails on A20-OLinuXino-LIME2-eMMC

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
  • Tanguy LE CARROUR
  • Simon Tournier
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Tanguy LE CARROUR
Severity
normal
T
T
Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote on 11 Nov 2022 18:53
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
166818920030.11941.18086085314230182732@localhost
Dear Guix,

I decided to try to install Guix System on my A20-OLinuXino-LIME2-eMMC.
I used the latest Armbian as a base system. I APT-installed Guix and
tried to `guix pull`, but it failed with the following message:

```shell
$ guix pull
# […]
building /gnu/store/05k8k43x5k78r0d41xcpw3ivwwr878rl-curl-7.84.0.tar.xz.drv...
building /gnu/store/y9svpa7kwv48mpvgl5z9w7skizm93vb1-gnutls-3.7.7.tar.xz.drv...
building /gnu/store/mz7ff25ihc77006p964ji5d47rhs2iam-guile-gnutls-3.7.9-checkout.drv...
building /gnu/store/sq3w2hk9z1va6q2dbjg16mi0afw64q9b-gnutls-3.7.7.drv...
/ 'build' phas\Backtrace:
15 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/mbs3lc77zy30nr82lnn2s135i2rvq095-compute-guix-derivation")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
155:9 14 (_ _)
| 159:9 13 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
152:2 12 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
152:2 11 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
2170:24 10 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 b46dc668> _ #:guile-for-build _ #:system _ #:target _)
1998:8 9 (_ _)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
299:22 8 (_ _)
1180:2 7 (_ _)
1046:2 6 (_ _)
892:4 5 (_ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
2055:12 4 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 b3d48578>)
1403:5 3 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.99 b3d48578> #<procedure b424d690 at ./guix/store.scm:20?> ?)
1419:15 2 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 b3d48578> _ _)
713:11 1 (process-stderr #<store-connection 256.99 b3d48578> _)
In ./guix/serialization.scm:
80:6 0 (read-int #<input-output: file 10>)

./guix/serialization.scm:80:6: In procedure read-int:
ERROR:
1. &nar-error:
file: #f
port: #<input-output: file 10>
/guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/mbs3lc77zy30nr82lnn2s135i2rvq095-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "ba8679fb2452f4466a98a99edf050ea7452c83f4"; system: "armhf-linux";
host version: "1.2.0"; pull-version: 1).
Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.
```

From the backtrace, I cannot figure out what went wrong! Any idea?

Best regards,


--
Tanguy
D
D
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote on 12 Nov 2022 16:40
Re: guix pull fails on A20-OlinuXino-LIME2-eMMC
(address . 59196@debbugs.gnu.org)
20221112164020.7352b106@primary_laptop
Hi,

Does it also fails with 'guix pull -M 1 -c 1' ?

Denis.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEeC+d2+Nrp/PU3kkGX138wUF34mMFAmNvvmUACgkQX138wUF3
4mMrFQ//d3kqnc5iczVrg7JZpTFGCalSIx2Gpmfs5jQXg3uBBovppkttKKxl1Sze
zZwUXaoCpQwMqVrgT1wET39uN3YQlT28jPdeur/lIByKHzgrVeiJMpxDg3WZOV0K
m0lrSG8KbvYKxMIs6A9oU5rq9esGbLIfr5Xv8kYcewpuYbjW1uV9hX3f16++0KW9
M3hRvIWOK/oVO2BIXOE2GjK9nsiLek7YXG69KiRZWxHesfViUn+HedbS5ktl3/GP
XYjT0uzNcpMS3uEGyqWUkX+iMTYSgN2csFatAEMs8bJqqVXGEwb7+/PiS2udfWo1
2U+U1ODO/zeqR4rzACz7f3SqP/0ERC8+xOLOOXTEjoUmPqeU50LZQi7k6D6Lux+c
og/lbnpETNg86Cimc/dOlHOdLDuxAlCeTUPgKOV57itY/WMP8ITS+ngbs4RuElUQ
+tYjvYQ8gZ0mtVHvLkuzJlfZv1uSTNNzo/joyCqjbHb3uvW9IAXRl4jdUE776TWt
3LQ1i49WMRQLSZe87n4WtkrnwkrwcsNZN8tYg+4DhE+mdqwkpOs73hI5U/pLWnx3
VMVN4dqCb1DzNW1VNvGlPMyWE38m5+4Jf4LN5smlEkr5KpbCWTmOmmXE5IsDr6Ug
wsKlNQnQHQSI41W5LD5zgoLgpJj9lOLllIbKfhm6WP8gJdQ3mAs=
=I3Dq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


T
T
Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote on 13 Nov 2022 11:48
bug#59196: guix pull fails on A20-OlinuXino-LIME2-eMMC
(name . Denis GNUtoo Carikli)(address . GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org)(address . 59196@debbugs.gnu.org)
166833649884.5170.14878109250915752009@localhost
Hi Denis,

Thanks for your answer.

Strange thing, though… I didn't received your answer!?
I came across it by chance while checking

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> Sat, 12 Nov 2022 16:40:20 +0100
> Does it also fails with 'guix pull -M 1 -c 1' ?

Thanks for the tip, but unfortunately, I get the same kind of error:

```
building /gnu/store/sq3w2hk9z1va6q2dbjg16mi0afw64q9b-gnutls-3.7.7.drv...
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
substitute: updating substitutes from 'https://ci.guix.gnu.org'... 100.0%
\ 'build' phas\Backtrace:
15 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/62r09kg575mg293by6fb83808p9diy3b-compute-guix-derivation")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
155:9 14 (_ _)
159:9 13|(_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
152:2 12 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
152:2 11 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
2170:24 10 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 b4712668> _ #:guile-for-build _ #:system _ #:target _)
1998:8 9 (_ _)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
299:22 8 (_ _)
1180:2 7 (_ _)
1046:2 6 (_ _)
892:4 5 (_ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
2055:12 4 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 b328f870>)
1403:5 3 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.99 b328f870> #<procedure b2d3b438 at ./guix/store.scm:20?> ?)
1419:15 2 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 b328f870> _ _)
713:11 1 (process-stderr #<store-connection 256.99 b328f870> _)
In ./guix/serialization.scm:
80:6 0 (read-int #<input-output: file 10>)

./guix/serialization.scm:80:6: In procedure read-int:
ERROR:
1. &nar-error:
file: #f
port: #<input-output: file 10> /guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/62r09kg575mg293by6fb83808p9diy3b-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "4f648f6096639427021da378fdfbd0c68d9d2aac"; system: "armhf-linux";
host version: "1.2.0"; pull-version: 1).
Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.
```

I'll try on a brand new SD card, because the one I used is a bit old.

Any other ideas about what might have gone wrong?

Regards,

--
Tanguy
D
D
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote on 13 Nov 2022 21:54
(name . Tanguy LE CARROUR)(address . tanguy@bioneland.org)(address . 59196@debbugs.gnu.org)
20221113215449.5d31b9fb@primary_laptop
On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 11:48:18 +0100
Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy@bioneland.org> wrote:

Toggle quote (10 lines)
> Hi Denis,
>
> Thanks for your answer.
>
> Strange thing, though… I didn't received your answer!?
> I came across it by chance while checking
> [bug-guix](https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix).
>
> > Sat, 12 Nov 2022 16:40:20 +0100
> > Does it also fails with 'guix pull -M 1 -c 1' ?
[...]
Toggle quote (3 lines)
> I'll try on a brand new SD card, because the one I used is a bit old.
>
> Any other ideas about what might have gone wrong?
The command I gave sometimes works on 32bit machines with a low
amount of RAM, so it was worth trying.

Unfortunately here I'm out of ideas, other people with more experience
in Guix might know better.

Also note that I also do have an A20-OlinuXino-LIME2-eMMC, so I might
be able to run tests too if they are fast to do. Maybe I should try to
cross compile a rootfs and see if it boots.

Long time ago it booted if I recall well, and then it stopped working
but I didn't take the time to track the regression down or to try again.

Denis.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ZO2d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


T
T
Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote on 14 Nov 2022 08:53
(name . Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli)(address . GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org)(address . 59196@debbugs.gnu.org)
166841242191.18688.11635928554710611383@localhost
Quoting Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli (2022-11-13 21:54:49)
Toggle quote (21 lines)
> On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 11:48:18 +0100
> Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy@bioneland.org> wrote:
> > > Sat, 12 Nov 2022 16:40:20 +0100
> > > Does it also fails with 'guix pull -M 1 -c 1' ?
> [...]
> > I'll try on a brand new SD card, because the one I used is a bit old.
> >
> > Any other ideas about what might have gone wrong?
> The command I gave sometimes works on 32bit machines with a low
> amount of RAM, so it was worth trying.
>
> Unfortunately here I'm out of ideas, other people with more experience
> in Guix might know better.
>
> Also note that I also do have an A20-OlinuXino-LIME2-eMMC, so I might
> be able to run tests too if they are fast to do. Maybe I should try to
> cross compile a rootfs and see if it boots.
>
> Long time ago it booted if I recall well, and then it stopped working
> but I didn't take the time to track the regression down or to try again.

Good to know.
I don't actually need Guix System on my SBC, but you know, I have it on
my computer @work, @home, on my laptop… so I thought to myself that it
would make more sense to have it everywhere!
Today my computers, tomorrow the world! ?


--
Tanguy
D
D
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote on 14 Nov 2022 23:44
(name . Tanguy LE CARROUR)(address . tanguy@bioneland.org)(address . 59196@debbugs.gnu.org)
20221114234405.66f568bb@primary_laptop
I've tried to cross compile an image but I end up with this build
failure:
Toggle quote (15 lines)
> $ zcat
> /var/log/guix/drvs/fl/nrxka21fgd5hpbchzp3fyv01xyrs2v-linux-modules.drv.gz
> Backtrace: 5 (primitive-load
> "/gnu/store/lm7mjsdx6p16pbavv80hpf561df?") In ice-9/eval.scm:
> 619:8 4 (_ #f)
> 626:19 3 (_ #<directory (guile-user) 7ffff5fdbc80>)
> 293:34 2 (_ #(#<directory (guile-user) 7ffff5fdbc80> #<procedu?>))
> In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
> 586:17 1 (map1 ("ahci" "usb-storage" "uas" "usbhid" "hid-gene?"
> ?)) In gnu/build/linux-modules.scm:
> 257:5 0 (_)
>
> gnu/build/linux-modules.scm:257:5: kernel module not found "ahci"
> "/gnu/store/is9dg680cwlzhj6k6j0vxz86zwkqvx5m-linux-libre-6.0.8/lib/modules"

Though I don't know if it is related or not to your issue.

Denis.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=zPhx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


D
D
Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote on 16 Nov 2022 04:17
(name . Tanguy LE CARROUR)(address . tanguy@bioneland.org)(address . 59196@debbugs.gnu.org)
20221116041715.3633eee7@primary_laptop
Hi,

I've found an idea: guix pull can pull to a precise commit:
Toggle quote (2 lines)
> --commit=COMMIT download the specified "guix" channel COMMIT

So maybe it works with a commit close to Guix 1.3. If that's the case
we can probably bisect it to the commit that broke your guix pull.

Denis.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEeC+d2+Nrp/PU3kkGX138wUF34mMFAmN0VjwACgkQX138wUF3
4mNU9Q/+OfZxI4ZhTHCCMjiN/u9E0sgAS4MDes9UFM7G5Fr6EQlFVqyIaLrhplAe
nK8jMk53ahaODzBsHi3WTBCpKFqyGWzYR9x3uQXqJqfVfgCCdTtrq3ecvGQlVy0x
jXyZevAuShaTIoClXgHd7qoG9/CJOLXJoryDfWCAxLT7ZmeRdsmFVTfV6PC7q6+0
kXjqJOa11YNCHVHcNIkhrqI5I/01LpB/Qpv0Jl6X9kgp+AawWIHyJXSOv2TJgfzv
9Dm1snr7y8DSdGdiZaCGZ1vnFhEwWN+YQXrohBKxxy90tgRcxw1vnRFn6VNXgA0i
GZ7/dTkAKOP0+LGF5FzXCG7exPYuiFpY/bsh8LvIGtEeFjXJzmhdec7FunMPrX35
U3UK3vY2FZj51nchZmP+KtUC+bnTd1+I7rida6ftTb38zRdWmiGkqTSzs0JD0L+l
GmsyO4VtIs0jGKn6eR14fyIqHCx7D1z85W81CL7ZHniOqd9lNLq4+ernEzqHE2da
FAzbkxNq07AFfEa1PDRAf7LbzxyLyTCJxJnJ9V91yciowc2ma90lUIvtbOJS8bEf
+nTppryU4LVI7V7CqcuyU+B//Li4P5tFAv867OK/pDSjg4fdWQtHZnc2fz2JyEVh
qnsBXTXciUQi0LfJVApnJSEV9JWsutkQ/QjtGz1k+EOkgr9v59Q=
=DkkP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


T
T
Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote on 16 Nov 2022 09:13
(name . Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli)(address . GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org)(address . 59196@debbugs.gnu.org)
166858638006.2150.4800330188429681399@localhost
Hi,


Quoting Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli (2022-11-16 04:17:15)
Toggle quote (6 lines)
> I've found an idea: guix pull can pull to a precise commit:
> > --commit=COMMIT download the specified "guix" channel COMMIT
>
> So maybe it works with a commit close to Guix 1.3. If that's the case
> we can probably bisect it to the commit that broke your guix pull.

Sounds like a good idea! I'll try that later today and let you know!

Thanks,


--
Tanguy
T
T
Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote on 16 Nov 2022 16:09
(name . Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli)(address . GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org)(address . 59196@debbugs.gnu.org)
166861139930.10592.6114061299601752476@localhost
Hi,


Quoting Tanguy LE CARROUR (2022-11-16 09:13:00)
Toggle quote (9 lines)
> Quoting Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli (2022-11-16 04:17:15)
> > I've found an idea: guix pull can pull to a precise commit:
> > > --commit=COMMIT download the specified "guix" channel COMMIT
> >
> > So maybe it works with a commit close to Guix 1.3. If that's the case
> > we can probably bisect it to the commit that broke your guix pull.
>
> Sounds like a good idea! I'll try that later today and let you know!

I bought a brand new "microSDHC UHS-1 A1" card and re-installed the
latest Armbian on it, and… I couldn't even test your idea, for `guix pull`
now fails with the following error message:

```
root@lime2:~# guix pull
Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'...
guix pull: error: Git error: error inflating zlib stream
```

I tried again, but… it failed again! ?

of Guix, but it fails to install Guix, for the `/tmp` directory on Armbian
is too small! ?

I thought installing Guix System on my Lime would be less… frustrating!
I think I'll redirect my energy to other tasks for the time being…

Any way, thanks for your time and help!


--
Tanguy
S
S
Simon Tournier wrote on 10 Sep 17:44 +0200
Re: bug#59196: `guix pull` fails on A20-OLinuXino-LIME2-eMMC
(name . Tanguy LE CARROUR)(address . tanguy@bioneland.org)(address . 59196@debbugs.gnu.org)
87mskfbjiu.fsf@gmail.com
Hi Tanguy,

On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 at 18:53, Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy@bioneland.org> wrote:

Toggle quote (5 lines)
> /guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/mbs3lc77zy30nr82lnn2s135i2rvq095-compute-guix-derivation'
> failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "ba8679fb2452f4466a98a99edf050ea7452c83f4"; system: "armhf-linux";
> host version: "1.2.0"; pull-version: 1).
> Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.

What is the status of this bug report?

Cheers,
simon
T
T
Tanguy LE CARROUR wrote on 12 Sep 08:33 +0200
(name . Simon Tournier)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)(address . 59196@debbugs.gnu.org)
172612283660.3530.5791417112964122705@bioneland.org
Hi Simon,

Thanks for diging this one out!


Quoting Simon Tournier (2024-09-10 17:44:41)
Toggle quote (9 lines)
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 at 18:53, Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy@bioneland.org> wrote:
>
> > /guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/mbs3lc77zy30nr82lnn2s135i2rvq095-compute-guix-derivation'
> > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "ba8679fb2452f4466a98a99edf050ea7452c83f4"; system: "armhf-linux";
> > host version: "1.2.0"; pull-version: 1).
> > Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.
>
> What is the status of this bug report?

As I mentioned: "I think I'll redirect my energy to other tasks for the time being…"
That’s exactly what I did!… and forgot to close the bug! ?
Should I just do that?

Regards,

--
Tanguy
S
S
Simon Tournier wrote on 20 Sep 18:22 +0200
(name . Tanguy LE CARROUR)(address . tanguy@bioneland.org)(address . 59196-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87zfo2s3bk.fsf@gmail.com
Hi Tanguy,

On jeu., 12 sept. 2024 at 08:33, Tanguy LE CARROUR <tanguy@bioneland.org> wrote:

Toggle quote (6 lines)
>> What is the status of this bug report?
>
> As I mentioned: "I think I'll redirect my energy to other tasks for the time being…"
> That’s exactly what I did!… and forgot to close the bug! ?
> Should I just do that?

Closed.

Thanks,
simon
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 59196@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 59196
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch