phoronix-test-suite downloads nonfree software (+ question on collaboration with Parabola on this package)

Done

Details

2 participants

Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli
Maxim Cournoyer

Owner: unassigned

Submitted by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli

Severity: normal

Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote on 3 Aug 2022 01:27

Recipients:

Message-ID:20220803012745.2d5e24de@primary_laptop

Hi,

Thanks a lot for working on having a recent FSDG compliant versions of

phoronix-test-suite.

I've found a minor issue with phoronix-test-suite and I've a couple of

questions to help synchronize between Parabola and Guix to prevent

accidental installation of nonfree software.

Nonfree software downloaded by phoronix-test-suite:

---------------------------------------------------

According to Debian, Linux has the following nonfree files:

Toggle quote (7 lines)

> Documentation/netlabel/draft-ietf-cipso-ipsecurity-01.txt

> arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/micropatch.c

> drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/af9005-script.h drivers/media/i2c/vs6624.c

> drivers/net/appletalk/cops*

> drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia

> drivers/video/fbdev/riva

The GNU project also mention that ("nonfree blobs are shipped with
Linux, the kernel") in the list of distros that are not FSDG
compliant[1].

When running 'phoronix-test-suite test build-linux-kernel' (and
selecting Yes(Y) to install the test), phoronix-test-suite downloads
a tarball of Linux.

So I assume that the tarball downloaded also have nonfree software like
arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/micropatch.c. So we also need to filter-out
two tests (to keep being FSDG compliant):

Toggle quote (3 lines)

> pts/build-linux-kernel

> pts/unpack-linux

As I understand, the other build should be fine.

Question on the package description and collaborating with Parabola:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

If I run 'phoronix-test-suite list' on a fresh Guix installation, it

lists nonfree software like BioShock Infinite, Hitman, which are games

that have not been released under free licenses (according to

Wikipedia).

I've installed Guix on a separate computer just for that (as it would

be negligence from my part to risk running nonfree software like that on

computers that are either hold keys to sign releases or build releases).

And there it seems that it runs hoses tests (I need to do that in a

terminal in a graphical interface like sway for instance) but I'm unsure

if it actually downloaded nonfree software or not as the tests seem to

fail and I didn't find the games being downloaded (but I only looked

rapidly).

If it didn't download any nonfree games, we could update the package

description to explain how this FSDG compliance is done to not make

users afraid and prevent invalid bug reports.

I also saw there is a python script[2] that somehow is supposed to take

care of FSDG compliance. How does it work in practice?

I'm also asking because I've also added phoronix-test-suite to Parabola

long time ago with a very different patch, and if for some reasons both

patches are incompatible, I don't want to end up in a situation where

users running Guix on top of Parabola would end up accidentally

installing nonfree software.

If that's the case it would be easier to fix the issue in Parabola

(just by updating phoronix-test-suite and taking care of informing the

users to delete their old ~/.phoronix-test-suite/) but I also need to

understand how the python script works first.

Once these questions are sorted out I'll try to install Parabola

instead of Guix on that test laptop, import my existing

~/.phoronix-test-suite/, install Guix on top, and install

phoronix-test-suite through Guix to see if the nonfree tests somehow

run something.

And I'll then report the result of test here and I'll then probably end

up updating in Parabola (and reusing your patch).

References:

-----------

[1]https://www.gnu.org/distros/common-distros.html

[2]gnu/packages/patches/phoronix-test-suite-fsdg.patch

Denis.

Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 3 Aug 2022 04:28

Recipients:(name . Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli)(address . GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org)(address . 56900@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87fsiejc0n.fsf@gmail.com

Hi Denis,

Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> writes:

Toggle quote (9 lines)

> Hi,

> Thanks a lot for working on having a recent FSDG compliant versions of

> phoronix-test-suite.

> I've found a minor issue with phoronix-test-suite and I've a couple of

> questions to help synchronize between Parabola and Guix to prevent

> accidental installation of nonfree software.

Thanks for reaching out!

Toggle quote (26 lines)> Nonfree software downloaded by phoronix-test-suite:
> ---------------------------------------------------
> According to Debian, Linux has the following nonfree files:
>> Documentation/netlabel/draft-ietf-cipso-ipsecurity-01.txt
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/micropatch.c
>> drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/af9005-script.h drivers/media/i2c/vs6624.c
>> drivers/net/appletalk/cops*
>> drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia
>> drivers/video/fbdev/riva
>
> The GNU project also mention that ("nonfree blobs are shipped with
> Linux, the kernel") in the list of distros that are not FSDG
> compliant[1].
>
> When running 'phoronix-test-suite test build-linux-kernel' (and
> selecting Yes(Y) to install the test), phoronix-test-suite downloads
> a tarball of Linux.
>
> So I assume that the tarball downloaded also have nonfree software like
> arch/powerpc/platforms/8xx/micropatch.c. So we also need to filter-out
> two tests (to keep being FSDG compliant):
>> pts/build-linux-kernel
>> pts/unpack-linux
>
> As I understand, the other build should be fine.

The test is probably marked as free (as in freedom) by the metadata

included in the test; we should rectify that in a source snippet and

open an issue upstream so that the correct metadata gets added. Looking

a it, the unpack-firefox would fall in the same category I believe.

Toggle quote (7 lines)

> Question on the package description and collaborating with Parabola:

> --------------------------------------------------------------------

> If I run 'phoronix-test-suite list' on a fresh Guix installation, it

> lists nonfree software like BioShock Infinite, Hitman, which are games

> that have not been released under free licenses (according to

> Wikipedia).

I confirm:

$ phoronix-test-suite list-all-tests | grep -iE '(hitman|bioshock)'

pts/bioshock-infinite BioShock Infinite Graphics

pts/hitman HITMAN Graphics

And the reason why:

Toggle snippet (7 lines)

$ grep License $(guix build phoronix-test-suite)/ob-cache/test-profiles/pts/hitman-1.0.1/test-definition.xml

$ grep License /gnu/store/bdjf3g5c0xv0hhygag1rwjsvq11y7j1h-phoronix-test-suite-10.8.3/share/phoronix-test-suite/ob-cache/test-profiles/pts/bioshock-infinite-1.0.1/test-definition.xml

We definitely should report these upstream, if they haven't been fixed

yet (there's a separate repository for the test metadata).

Toggle quote (4 lines)

> If it didn't download any nonfree games, we could update the package

> description to explain how this FSDG compliance is done to not make

> users afraid and prevent invalid bug reports.

Good idea.

Toggle quote (3 lines)

> I also saw there is a python script[2] that somehow is supposed to take

> care of FSDG compliance. How does it work in practice?

phoronix-test-suite comes with the test metadata so that it can at list

them offline upon first use. Normally, it fetches updates of this

metadata but this gets disabled in our packaging of it, so only our

cleaned up offline metadata gets used.

So the Python script takes care of pruning nonfree tests from the

metadata, based on the metadata of the tests themselves (normally their

'License' field is set to 'Free' for free software).

I hope that helps clearing how it works.

Would you like to try preparing a snippet patch turning the above 'Free'

into 'Proprietary' or the likes so that the Python script can remove

them? Otherwise I can look into it.

Thanks,

Maxim

Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli wrote on 4 Aug 2022 16:27

Recipients:(name . Maxim Cournoyer)(address . maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com)(address . 56900@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:20220804162700.419638f3@primarylaptop.localdomain

On Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:28:56 -0400

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:

Toggle quote (1 lines)

> Hi Denis,

Hi,

Toggle quote (3 lines)

> Would you like to try preparing a snippet patch turning the above

> 'Free' into 'Proprietary' or the likes so that the Python script can

> remove them? Otherwise I can look into it.

Since you wrote the python script you might be way faster if you do it.

By the way I've found new issues:

- phoronix-test-suite test system/gnupg => This downloads

linux-4.3.tar.gz, so it has the same issue.

- phoronix-test-suite test pts/gnupg => This downloads

ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso so it has the same issue because

ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso probably contains nonfree firmwares.

Denis.

Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 2 Sep 2022 14:58

control message for bug #56900

Recipients:(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87v8q66igo.fsf@gmail.com

close 56900

quit

Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 2 Sep 2022 14:58

Re: bug#56900: phoronix-test-suite downloads nonfree software (+ question on collaboration with Parabola on this package)

Recipients:(name . Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli)(address . GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org)(address . 56900-done@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87wnam6ihb.fsf@gmail.com

Hello Denis,

Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org> writes:

Toggle quote (18 lines)> On Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:28:56 -0400
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Denis,
> Hi,
>
>> Would you like to try preparing a snippet patch turning the above
>> 'Free' into 'Proprietary' or the likes so that the Python script can
>> remove them?  Otherwise I can look into it.
> Since you wrote the python script you might be way faster if you do it.
>
> By the way I've found new issues: 
> - phoronix-test-suite test system/gnupg => This downloads
>   linux-4.3.tar.gz, so it has the same issue.
> - phoronix-test-suite test pts/gnupg => This downloads
>   ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso so it has the same issue because
>   ubuntu-20.04-desktop-amd64.iso probably contains nonfree firmwares.

I've fixed all the problems reported (and then some) with

448deee2b73914e094f22684e2d38637502cd4f0.

Thanks for reported them!

Closing.

Maxim

Closed

Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 56900@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it

mumi current 56900

Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)

mumi am -- -s

Or, compose a reply to this issue

mumi compose

Or, send patches to this issue

mumi send-email *.patch

is:open	open issues
is:done	closed issues
submitter:<who>	search issue submitter
author:<who>	search by message author
date:yesterday..now	search by issue date
mdate:3m..2d	search by message date