Am Montag, dem 18.04.2022 um 13:52 +0000 schrieb Maya:
No problem. Now you do :)
Many upstreams don't have useful synopses or descriptions, so we often
have to adapt them. In other words, it's no harm if you put more
effort into synopses and descriptions than merely copying them from
elsewhere, as long as formal requirements are met (e.g. the synopsis is
a short line, the description consists of full sentences, etc.)
Toggle quote (8 lines)
> > I agree with Maxime. Use "Nano Theme", "@code{nano-theme}" or
> > simply "This package provides a theme that comes in two flavours".
> > I'm not sure whether we should add "consistent" -- it would suggest
> > that other themes are inconsistent, which sure some of them might
> > be but most don't strive to be.
> I wouldn't call it that ("consistent") myself and I do agree that it
> sounds a bit weird, if it is, again, fine, that it will not agree
> with upstream, I will change it.
As above, we usually strip all marketing words from upstream
That's fine imo. IIUC nano-theme would be a feature that you can
Last time I checked, Nerd fonts were a special kind of mess that's
difficult to disentangle and more difficult to check licenses on. I
wouldn't bother too hard.
Is the recommendation important in your opinion?