guix pull fails

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Jesse Gibbons
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • Maxime Devos
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Jesse Gibbons
Severity
normal
J
J
Jesse Gibbons wrote on 1 Feb 2022 20:50
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
9a36f0be-2251-af70-3b26-3ae18590f976@gmail.com
~$ guix pull
Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at
Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to 787b13a (279 new
commits)...
Building from this channel:
Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... \Backtrace:
          17 (primitive-load
"/gnu/store/rx23w5k5nys4a2hjwcy4lampkhnslj3m-compute-guix-derivation")
In ice-9/eval.scm:
    155:9 16 (_ _)
    159:9 15 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?>
?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
    152:2 14 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
    152:2 13 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
In ./guix/store.scm:
  2123:24 12 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>
#<procedure 7f6910644870 at ./guix/self.scm:12?> ?)
   1960:8 11 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
In ./guix/gexp.scm:
   296:22 10 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
   1180:2  9 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
   1046:2  8 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
    892:4  7 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
In ./guix/store.scm:
  2008:12  6 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
   1406:5  5 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.99
7f691ce7e140> #<procedure 7f6915db94a0 at ./guix/stor?> ?)
  1421:15  4 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>
("/gnu/store/gmi62pbnf0jfish26chd7pvfzs2rzlxa-guile-ssh-?" ?) ?)
  1421:15  3 (loop #f)
   733:11  2 (process-stderr #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140> _)
In ./guix/serialization.scm:
   102:11  1 (read-int #<input-output: file 10>)
     80:6  0 (get-bytevector-n* #<input-output: file 10> 8)

./guix/serialization.scm:80:6: In procedure get-bytevector-n*:
ERROR:
  1. &nar-error:
      file: #f
      port: #<input-output: file 10>
guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
'/gnu/store/rx23w5k5nys4a2hjwcy4lampkhnslj3m-compute-guix-derivation'
failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
"787b13a5d9df8f0cc7170de1b80cead68b516c66"; system: "x86_64-linux";
host version: "90a41fe388102d448b3f91a070e38a7680d2d568"; pull-version: 1).
Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.

--
-Jesse Gibbons
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 2 Mar 2022 12:19
(name . Jesse Gibbons)(address . jgibbons2357@gmail.com)(address . 53710-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87r17k38la.fsf@gnu.org
Hi,

Jesse Gibbons <jgibbons2357@gmail.com> skribis:

Toggle quote (50 lines)
> ~$ guix pull
> Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at
> 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'...
> Authenticating channel 'guix', commits 9edb3f6 to 787b13a (279 new
> commits)...
> Building from this channel:
>   guix      https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git    787b13a
> Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... \Backtrace:
>           17 (primitive-load
> "/gnu/store/rx23w5k5nys4a2hjwcy4lampkhnslj3m-compute-guix-derivation")
> In ice-9/eval.scm:
>     155:9 16 (_ _)
>     159:9 15 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#<directory (guile-u?>
> ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))
> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>     152:2 14 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
>     152:2 13 (with-fluid* _ _ _)
> In ./guix/store.scm:
>   2123:24 12 (run-with-store #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>
> #<procedure 7f6910644870 at ./guix/self.scm:12?> ?)
>    1960:8 11 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
> In ./guix/gexp.scm:
>    296:22 10 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
>    1180:2  9 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
>    1046:2  8 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
>     892:4  7 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
> In ./guix/store.scm:
>   2008:12  6 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>)
>    1406:5  5 (map/accumulate-builds #<store-connection 256.99
> 7f691ce7e140> #<procedure 7f6915db94a0 at ./guix/stor?> ?)
>   1421:15  4 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140>
> ("/gnu/store/gmi62pbnf0jfish26chd7pvfzs2rzlxa-guile-ssh-?" ?) ?)
>   1421:15  3 (loop #f)
>    733:11  2 (process-stderr #<store-connection 256.99 7f691ce7e140> _)
> In ./guix/serialization.scm:
>    102:11  1 (read-int #<input-output: file 10>)
>      80:6  0 (get-bytevector-n* #<input-output: file 10> 8)
>
> ./guix/serialization.scm:80:6: In procedure get-bytevector-n*:
> ERROR:
>   1. &nar-error:
>       file: #f
>       port: #<input-output: file 10>
> guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
> '/gnu/store/rx23w5k5nys4a2hjwcy4lampkhnslj3m-compute-guix-derivation'
> failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
> "787b13a5d9df8f0cc7170de1b80cead68b516c66"; system: "x86_64-linux";
> host version: "90a41fe388102d448b3f91a070e38a7680d2d568"; pull-version: 1).
> Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.

Thanks for reporting the issue. Unfortunately, I suspect it was “just”
a transient issue (probably a networking issue while downloading
substitutes for guile-ssh, which we see in the backtrace). It’s
unfortunate that it crashed like that.

Ludo’.
Closed
M
M
Maxime Devos wrote on 2 Mar 2022 14:14
"guix pull" doesn't have nice error messages in case of network errors
(address . 53710@debbugs.gnu.org)
126927a6292208ac84e74afa1a7dab31d4a5968e.camel@telenet.be
Ludovic Courtès schreef op wo 02-03-2022 om 12:19 [+0100]:
Toggle quote (21 lines)
> > ./guix/serialization.scm:80:6: In procedure get-bytevector-n*:
> > ERROR:
> >   1. &nar-error:
> >       file: #f
> >       port: #<input-output: file 10>
> > guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
> > '/gnu/store/rx23w5k5nys4a2hjwcy4lampkhnslj3m-compute-guix-
> > derivation'
> > failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
> > "787b13a5d9df8f0cc7170de1b80cead68b516c66"; system: "x86_64-linux";
> > host version: "90a41fe388102d448b3f91a070e38a7680d2d568"; pull-
> > version: 1).
> > Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to
> > <bug-guix@gnu.org>.
>
> Thanks for reporting the issue.  Unfortunately, I suspect it was
> “just”
> a transient issue (probably a networking issue while downloading
> substitutes for guile-ssh, which we see in the backtrace).  It’s
> unfortunate that it crashed like that.

Even if it's ‘only’ a networking issue, shouldn't it be reported
better? When "guix package -u" fails due to networking errors, the
error messages are much clearer. Why not the same for "guix pull"?
Perhaps the issue should be reopened?

Greetings,
Maxime.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iI0EABYKADUWIQTB8z7iDFKP233XAR9J4+4iGRcl7gUCYh9t0hccbWF4aW1lZGV2
b3NAdGVsZW5ldC5iZQAKCRBJ4+4iGRcl7jG4AQC6B9RuXg/x9h1OqGOgQONC0AVE
39FGyD6xUkN2+M6oQQD/TIm4SAB7IncZr43E1SEqjAXPrbD1KocfKI2Yd2N5JwQ=
=v+SX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


J
J
Jesse Gibbons wrote on 2 Mar 2022 17:31
(address . 53710@debbugs.gnu.org)
68f14fc1-39ee-8e33-bc2a-87f9ec077054@gmail.com
On 3/2/22 06:14, Maxime Devos wrote:
Toggle quote (27 lines)
> Ludovic Courtès schreef op wo 02-03-2022 om 12:19 [+0100]:
>>> ./guix/serialization.scm:80:6: In procedure get-bytevector-n*:
>>> ERROR:
>>>   1. &nar-error:
>>>       file: #f
>>>       port: #<input-output: file 10>
>>> guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program
>>> '/gnu/store/rx23w5k5nys4a2hjwcy4lampkhnslj3m-compute-guix-
>>> derivation'
>>> failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version:
>>> "787b13a5d9df8f0cc7170de1b80cead68b516c66"; system: "x86_64-linux";
>>> host version: "90a41fe388102d448b3f91a070e38a7680d2d568"; pull-
>>> version: 1).
>>> Please report the COMPLETE output above by email to
>>> <bug-guix@gnu.org>.
>> Thanks for reporting the issue.  Unfortunately, I suspect it was
>> “just”
>> a transient issue (probably a networking issue while downloading
>> substitutes for guile-ssh, which we see in the backtrace).  It’s
>> unfortunate that it crashed like that.
> Even if it's ‘only’ a networking issue, shouldn't it be reported
> better? When "guix package -u" fails due to networking errors, the
> error messages are much clearer. Why not the same for "guix pull"?
> Perhaps the issue should be reopened?
>
> Greetings,
> Maxime.
A proper error message would at least ensure this particular kind of
crash does not prompt the end user to send a bug report. It would seem
the real bug is communication to the user, "you found a bug, report it
to the developers." instead of "Network error. Try later."

--
-Jesse Gibbons
?