[PATCH] gnu: python2-bottle: Remove package.

DoneSubmitted by jgart.
Details
2 participants
  • jgart
  • Ludovic Courtès
Owner
unassigned
Severity
normal
J
J
jgart wrote on 7 Dec 2021 22:00
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)(name . jgart)(address . jgart@dismail.de)
20211207210007.1058-1-jgart@dismail.de
* gnu/packages/python-web.scm (python2-bottle): Delete variable.
---
gnu/packages/python-web.scm | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (16 lines)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python-web.scm b/gnu/packages/python-web.scm
index d4a785b2fc..fb23054489 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python-web.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python-web.scm
@@ -4170,9 +4170,6 @@ (define-public python-bottle
     (description "@code{python-bottle} is a WSGI framework for small web-applications.")
     (license license:expat)))
 
-(define-public python2-bottle
-  (package-with-python2 python-bottle))
-
 (define-public python-wtforms
   (package
     (name "python-wtforms")
-- 
2.34.0
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 19 Dec 2021 23:25
(name . jgart)(address . jgart@dismail.de)(address . 52359@debbugs.gnu.org)
87bl1cmdvh.fsf@gnu.org
Hi,

jgart <jgart@dismail.de> skribis:

Toggle quote (2 lines)
> * gnu/packages/python-web.scm (python2-bottle): Delete variable.

Apparently it still has users so we can’t remove it yet:

Toggle snippet (4 lines)
$ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l python2-bottle
Building the following 2 packages would ensure 3 dependent packages are rebuilt: h-client@0.0a0-138 virtaal@0.7.1

Ludo’.
J
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 52359@debbugs.gnu.org)
20211219175816.GB5741@gac
On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 23:25:06 +0100 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
Toggle quote (8 lines)
> Hi,
>
> jgart <jgart@dismail.de> skribis:
>
> > * gnu/packages/python-web.scm (python2-bottle): Delete variable.
>
> Apparently it still has users so we can’t remove it yet:

Hi Ludo,

Thanks for the review!

The best way to check is with `guix refresh --list-dependent python2-bottle`?

Or, you're referring to the fact that there are still users using the
python2 version of bottle itself?

Also, when upgrading a package, what is your workflow for testing and making
sure you don't break a dependent package?

Do you also build all packages listed in the output of
`guix refresh --list-dependent package-name` before sending a patch?

My experience with this issue is when I updated python-jedi recently.
I sent the patch. It got accepted. (Un)relatedly, I tried installing
bpython a day later and bpython was broken. My first guess is that the
upgrade of python-jedi broke the current version of bpython in master. I
wasn't thinking about bpython when I was upgrading python-jedi.

Could any of the above be mentioned in the cookbook or the manual? Excuse me if
I TDLR'ed that part.

Any advice is much appreciated.

Toggle quote (7 lines)
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -l python2-bottle
> Building the following 2 packages would ensure 3 dependent packages are rebuilt: h-client@0.0a0-138 virtaal@0.7.1
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Ludo’.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 20 Dec 2021 16:05
control message for bug #52359
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87y24fiaf0.fsf@gnu.org
tags 52359 wontfix
close 52359
quit
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send email to 52359@debbugs.gnu.org