(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
868s1blc4k.fsf@mgsn.dev
Hello Guix,
The Texinfo manual says [0] that I should be able to use @abbr, and
prefer it over @acronym when the text is not all capital letters, but I
get a backtrace when I try to use it in a package description:
Toggle snippet (36 lines)
Backtrace:
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1752:10 16 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In unknown file:
15 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7fa49b8ea0c0>)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
724:2 14 (call-with-prompt _ _ #<procedure default-prompt-handle?>)
In ice-9/eval.scm:
619:8 13 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7fa49b8f0c80>)))
In guix/ui.scm:
2185:7 12 (run-guix . _)
2148:10 11 (run-guix-command _ . _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1752:10 10 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
In guix/scripts/package.scm:
906:9 9 (_)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
634:9 8 (for-each #<procedure 7fa49878c9e8 at guix/scripts/pac?> ?)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1747:15 7 (with-exception-handler #<procedure 7fa4899fd900 at ic?> ?)
In srfi/srfi-1.scm:
634:9 6 (for-each #<procedure 7fa489a05520 at guix/scripts/pac?> ?)
In guix/ui.scm:
1558:14 5 (package->recutils _ #<output: file /dev/pts/2> _ # _ # _)
1432:23 4 (texi->plain-text _)
In texinfo.scm:
1132:22 3 (parse _)
967:36 2 (loop #<input: string 7fa489a08770> (*fragment*) #<pro?> ?)
92:2 1 (command-spec _)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1685:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1685:16: In procedure raise-exception:
Throw to key `parser-error' with args `(#f "Unknown command" abbr)'.
If this isn't an oversight, and not all Texinfo markup is supported,
that should be noted in the manual.
--
Sarah