Cuirass is not building Mutt

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Leo Famulari
  • Ludovic Courtès
  • Mathieu Othacehe
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Leo Famulari
Severity
normal
L
L
Leo Famulari wrote on 8 Jun 2021 21:09
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)(address . guix-sysadmin@gnu.org)
YL/AbAMtXG3UpMVW@jasmine.lan
Recently I noticed that I'm not getting substitutes for Mutt.

Looking at the ci.guix.gnu.org web interface, it seems that we stopped
building Mutt about a month ago:


And `guix weather` confirms that we seem to have stopped building it:

------
$ guix describe
Generation 174 Jun 08 2021 14:59:25 (current)
guix 74c7055
commit: 74c70553394e32f7b6d5fa56da3bf3b18623c70f
$ guix weather mutt
computing 1 package derivations for x86_64-linux...
looking for 1 store items on https://ci.guix.gnu.org...
0.0% substitutes available (0 out of 1)
unknown substitute sizes
0.0 MiB on disk (uncompressed)

0.0% (0 out of 1) of the missing items are queued
at least 1,000 queued builds
x86_64-linux: 906 (90.6%)
aarch64-linux: 9 (.9%)
i686-linux: 85 (8.5%)
build rate: .00 builds per hour
x86_64-linux: 0.00 builds per hour
i686-linux: 0.00 builds per hour
aarch64-linux: 0.00 builds per hour
------

I wonder what is going on?
M
M
Mathieu Othacehe wrote on 9 Jun 2021 11:35
(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)
87bl8fz8g0.fsf@gnu.org
Hello Leo,

Toggle quote (2 lines)
> I wonder what is going on?

The current mutt package output is:

Toggle snippet (4 lines)
mathieu@meije ~$ guix build mutt --no-grafts
/gnu/store/c0wp5iq5k11mvqrm4bs011qlm7qy48ia-mutt-2.0.7

The last mutt build on the master specification is
output. This build has not been attempted again because its output
didn't change.

The substitute is however missing as you noticed. That's because the
Cuirass GC root expired, and the nar file also probably expired its 90
days TTL.

We should maybe increase this TTL, or make sure that every "latest"
master derivation is covered by a GC root.

WDYT?

Thanks,

Mathieu
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 18 Jun 2021 11:37
Re: bug#48926: Cuirass is not building Mutt
(name . Mathieu Othacehe)(address . othacehe@gnu.org)
87tulvh5t6.fsf@gnu.org
Hi,

Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> skribis:

Toggle quote (9 lines)
> The substitute is however missing as you noticed. That's because the
> Cuirass GC root expired, and the nar file also probably expired its 90
> days TTL.
>
> We should maybe increase this TTL, or make sure that every "latest"
> master derivation is covered by a GC root.
>
> WDYT?

Mathieu, do you have Zabbix graphs showing how we’re doing wrt. storage
on berlin?

If we’re doing well, we should definitely increase the ‘guix publish’ TTL.

Thanks,
Ludo’.
M
M
Mathieu Othacehe wrote on 18 Jun 2021 11:48
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
878s37cxlj.fsf@gnu.org
Hey,

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> Mathieu, do you have Zabbix graphs showing how we’re doing wrt. storage
> on berlin?

Here's one attached, we have been stable around ~10TiB of free space for
the last couple of months.

Toggle quote (2 lines)
> If we’re doing well, we should definitely increase the ‘guix publish’ TTL.

What about increasing it to say 180 days?

Thanks,

Mathieu
M
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 28 Jun 2021 15:11
(name . Mathieu Othacehe)(address . othacehe@gnu.org)
87h7hiw2ve.fsf@gnu.org
Hi,

Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> skribis:

Toggle quote (6 lines)
>> Mathieu, do you have Zabbix graphs showing how we’re doing wrt. storage
>> on berlin?
>
> Here's one attached, we have been stable around ~10TiB of free space for
> the last couple of months.

Interesting.

The graph suggests that GC is running everyday to collect probably a few
GiBs. Perhaps we should ‘guix gc -F15T’ once a week to reduce GC work
on subsequent days?

Toggle quote (4 lines)
>> If we’re doing well, we should definitely increase the ‘guix publish’ TTL.
>
> What about increasing it to say 180 days?

Sounds good to me. Can you make the change?

Thanks,
Ludo’.
M
M
Mathieu Othacehe wrote on 19 Dec 2021 18:04
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
87ilvkplvi.fsf@gnu.org
Hey,

Toggle quote (4 lines)
>> What about increasing it to say 180 days?
>
> Sounds good to me. Can you make the change?

That was done with ca6f40272fdf5644597f6ad2e38fa8ab2907d126.

Closing,

Thanks,

Mathieu
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 48926@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 48926
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch