‘chicken-build-system’ is not able to deal with specific version of egg

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
One participant
  • Xinglu Chen
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Xinglu Chen
Severity
normal
X
X
Xinglu Chen wrote on 3 Jun 2021 23:24
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)(name . raingloom)(address . raingloom@riseup.net)
874keed4kh.fsf@yoctocell.xyz
I am trying to package ‘chicken-begin-syntax’, it requires version 0.2.1
of ‘module-declarations’, which I have created a Guix package for (only
exists on my local branch). However, when compiling
‘chicken-begin-syntax’, ‘chicken-install’ complains about an outdated
version of ‘module-declarations’, even though it’s not outdated.

Removing this restriction makes it build.

The content of ‘begin-syntax.egg’:

Toggle snippet (10 lines)
((synopsis "Convenience macro for inline syntax expansion")
(author "Evan Hanson")
(license "BSD")
(category lang-exts)
(dependencies matchable)
(test-dependencies srfi-1)
(build-dependencies (module-declarations "0.2.1"))
(components (extension begin-syntax (csc-options "-X" "module-declarations"))))

Build error message:

Toggle snippet (16 lines)
starting phase `build'
The following installed extensions are outdated, because `begin-syntax' requires later versions:

module-declarations (0.0.0 -> 0.2.1)

Do you want to replace the existing extensions? (yes/no/abort)
Error: (string->list) bad argument type - not a string: #!eof
command "chicken-install" "-cached" "-no-install" "begin-syntax" failed with status 70
note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-chicken-begin-syntax-0.2.1.drv-0'
builder for `/gnu/store/gw8w10whrz9vmiaqhj5p9a8kwzd37pcp-chicken-begin-syntax-0.2.1.drv' failed with exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/gw8w10whrz9vmiaqhj5p9a8kwzd37pcp-chicken-begin-syntax-0.2.1.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/gw/8w10whrz9vmiaqhj5p9a8kwzd37pcp-chicken-begin-syntax-0.2.1.drv.bz2'.
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/9lfv9h6ra9g5adw9ppdd1yf2r3z1bcc2-chicken-sourcehut-0.3.3.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/9lfv9h6ra9g5adw9ppdd1yf2r3z1bcc2-chicken-sourcehut-0.3.3.drv' failed

I also tried passing the ‘-force’ and ‘-verbose’ flags to
‘chicken-install’, now it complains about ‘module-declarations’ not
being cached. ¯\_(?)_/¯

Toggle snippet (16 lines)
starting phase `build'
begin-syntax located at /tmp/guix-build-chicken-begin-syntax-0.2.1.drv-0/begin-syntax
checking begin-syntax ...
checking platform for `begin-syntax'
checking dependencies for `begin-syntax'
upgrade: module-declarations
module-declarations not cached

Error: extension not cached
command "chicken-install" "-cached" "-no-install" "-force" "-verbose" "begin-syntax" failed with status 70
note: keeping build directory `/tmp/guix-build-chicken-begin-syntax-0.2.1.drv-6'
builder for `/gnu/store/87d8vdmsbmw5nl163j4x10km82swxash-chicken-begin-syntax-0.2.1.drv' failed with exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/87d8vdmsbmw5nl163j4x10km82swxash-chicken-begin-syntax-0.2.1.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/87/d8vdmsbmw5nl163j4x10km82swxash-chicken-begin-syntax-0.2.1.drv.bz2'.
guix build: error: build of `/gnu/store/87d8vdmsbmw5nl163j4x10km82swxash-chicken-begin-syntax-0.2.1.drv' failed
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=X2ax
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

?