[PATCH 0/1] rtl8812au-aircrack-ng won't build on Linux 5.10

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • David Dashyan
  • Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
David Dashyan
Severity
normal

Debbugs page

David Dashyan wrote 4 years ago
(address . guix-patches@gnu.org)(name . David Dashyan)(address . mail@davie.li)
20201222104650.11799-1-mail@davie.li
Hello! I'm using and recently it stopped building succesfully.
Probably due to kernel update I'm not too sure.

Fix for this was just merged today:

I haven't tested it on kernell versions defined in linux.scm. Do I need to do
it before submitting patch for linux module?

David Dashyan (1):
rtl8812au-aircrack-ng-linux-module: Update to 62cb003

gnu/packages/linux.scm | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)


base-commit: 2e7c2dc8fa64442eb5b67670c5533090bebdd7fd
--
2.29.2
David Dashyan wrote 4 years ago
[PATCH 1/1] rtl8812au-aircrack-ng-linux-module: Update to 62cb003
(address . 45362@debbugs.gnu.org)(name . David Dashyan)(address . mail@davie.li)
20201222105129.11971-1-mail@davie.li
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (34 lines)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 01dba7e92d..d7e91f7c4f 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2020 Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
;;; Copyright © 2020 Greg Hogan <code@greghogan.com>
;;; Copyright © 2020 Zhu Zihao <all_but_last@163.com>
+;;; Copyright © 2020 David Dashyan <mail@davie.li>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -1119,8 +1120,8 @@ and should be used with caution, especially on untested models.")
(license license:gpl3+))) ; see README.md (no licence headers)
(define-public rtl8812au-aircrack-ng-linux-module
- (let ((commit "e9fbf5c051453941bbc029810b893a6c010714e6")
- (revision "2"))
+ (let ((commit "62cb003043e4daeeba0b8805137fa604af450ed2")
+ (revision "3"))
(package
(name "rtl8812au-aircrack-ng-linux-module")
(version (git-version "5.6.4.2" revision commit))
@@ -1132,7 +1133,7 @@ and should be used with caution, especially on untested models.")
(commit commit)))
(file-name (git-file-name name version))
(sha256
- (base32 "0y71q7ajwz1w38gdmxd4p05hhkqndq504nndy6vfa16fxz6pqxhn"))
+ (base32 "1kragxkjprjy7nl9h2rd0mwcry1ygw07zb1p2qkj7cmz0r2035yz"))
(modules '((guix build utils)))
(snippet
'(begin
--
2.29.2
David Dashyan wrote 4 years ago
Re: [PATCH 0/1] rtl8812au-aircrack-ng won't build on Linux 5.10
(name . David Dashyan)(address . mail@davie.li)(address . 45362@debbugs.gnu.org)
87k0tartqc.fsf@davie.li
Oops attached wrong pr link..

Toggle quote (1 lines)
> Hello! I'm using and recently it stopped building succesfully.
* I'm using rtl8812au-aircrack-ng and recently...

--
David aka zzappie
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote 4 years ago
Re: [bug#45362] [PATCH 0/1] rtl8812au-aircrack-ng won't build on Linux 5.10
(name . David Dashyan)(address . mail@davie.li)
877dpaauip.fsf@nckx
David,

David Dashyan 写道：
Toggle quote (2 lines)
> Probably due to kernel update I'm not too sure.

Hah, yes :-) Same damn upstream change that kept me busy all
morning.

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> Fix for this was just merged today:
> https://github.com/aircrack-ng/rtl8812au/pull/791

At a glance that looks like it should keep working fine on older
kernels.

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> I haven't tested it on kernell versions defined in linux.scm.
> Do I need to do
> it before submitting patch for linux module?

I would, at least the latest ‘longterm’ release, currently 5.4.
In this case it built fine.

The project obviously intend to keep backwards compatibility so
any regressions are theirs to fix & ours to update or patch to.

Pushed with our conventional commit message, please take a
look[0].

Thanks!

T G-R

[0]:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX+Hn/w0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15H4IBANBynDa4Kkps9UQ0q1YshYkUlZdehGuvsm637RFe
Iq2QAP9NRgnb8ccZUqd+TI/oweLeXR71/Ndcg16SlAJ43ykcAw==
=X+li
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

David Dashyan wrote 4 years ago
(name . Tobias Geerinckx-Rice)(address . me@tobias.gr)
87h7odspa5.fsf@davie.li
Hello Tobias!

Toggle quote (2 lines)
> I would, at least the latest ‘longterm’ release, currently 5.4. In
> this case it built fine.
How do you test it btw? With guix vm?

Toggle quote (1 lines)
> Pushed with our conventional commit message, please take a look[0].
Cool! Thanks for pointing out

--
David aka zzappie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Lupu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Closed
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote 4 years ago
(name . David Dashyan)(address . mail@davie.li)(address . 45362-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87zh25tw6v.fsf@nckx
David,

David Dashyan 写道：
Toggle quote (5 lines)
>> I would, at least the latest ‘longterm’ release, currently
>> 5.4. In
>> this case it built fine.
> How do you test it btw? With guix vm?

In this case I did, mainly because I was using 5.4 VMs for other
things and it was the least effort. Otherwise I'd have settled
for build testing by simply adding ‘#:linux linux-libre-5.4’ in my
git checkout and ./pre-inst-env guix building it.

I don't have the hardware nearby to really test it anyway.

Kind regards,

T G-R
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCX+JYyA0cbWVAdG9iaWFz
LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15iZUA/ixKzC78Y7ypIQqTZp9Sq1c5NyWsfs9Fdlo1w3lm
g1UFAPwNmHEU5h/pckYYO0YMOXrDm61cbUKf0h5MN6ALaoLtCw==
=yWUn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 45362@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 45362
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch
You may also tag this issue. See list of standard tags. For example, to set the confirmed and easy tags
mumi command -t +confirmed -t +easy
Or, remove the moreinfo tag and set the help tag
mumi command -t -moreinfo -t +help