Cuirass problem with building from manifest file

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • david larsson
  • Mathieu Othacehe
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
david larsson
Severity
normal
D
D
david larsson wrote on 2 Nov 2020 20:45
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
2840f15b6b64cd4d98d3ba5f2255708a@selfhosted.xyz
Hi!

I am unable to build a simple manifest containing the hello package, see
below. I tried imitating the manual
perhaps the manifest.scm is not supposed to contain a regular manifest
or maybe that config example is outdated?

============================
The hello.scm file - works fine using guix package -m hello.scm
============================

cat /home/cuirass/my-guixsd-config.sh/manifests/hello.scm
(specifications->manifest
(append (list "hello")
'()))

============================
From /var/log/cuirass.log
============================

2020-11-02T20:06:25 fetching input 'my-guixsd-config' of spec 'my-pkgs'
2020-11-02T20:06:25 fetching input 'my-guix-packages' of spec 'my-pkgs'
2020-11-02T20:06:25 fetching input 'guix' of spec 'my-pkgs'
2020-11-02T20:06:26 fetched input 'my-guixsd-config' of spec 'my-pkgs'
(commit "fb3001bd453583b4638bf6ec7187b5758d7b0715")
2020-11-02T20:06:26 fetched input 'my-guix-packages' of spec 'my-pkgs'
(commit "9f9c644076b088aabee76626598115c0fe6bfbde")
2020-11-02T20:06:26 fetched input 'guix' of spec 'my-pkgs' (commit
"7c02eb6c8d7d050ecb8f3082c4a754ad32211403")
2020-11-02T20:06:26 next evaluation in 36000 seconds
2020-11-02T20:06:26 evaluating spec 'my-pkgs'
Uncaught exception in fiber ##f:
In cuirass/base.scm:
785:13 3 (_)
In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
1736:10 2 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _ # _)
1669:16 1 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
1667:16 0 (raise-exception _ #:continuable? _)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1667:16: In procedure raise-exception:
ERROR:
1. &evaluation-error:
name: "my-pkgs"
id: 1

============================
My cuirass-specs
============================

(define %cuirass-specs
#~(
list
'((#:name . "my-pkgs")
(#:load-path-inputs . ("guix"))
(#:package-path-inputs . ("my-guix-packages"))
(#:proc-input . "guix")
(#:proc-file . "build-aux/cuirass/gnu-system.scm")
(#:proc . cuirass-jobs)
(#:proc-args .
((subset . manifests)
;; This builds fine!
;;(subset . ("hello" "cowsay" "orgmk" "fwknop" "python-on-guile"
"libxml2-xpath0" "guile-bash-parallel" "guile-base64" "perl-data-ical"
"python-pydotplus"))
(systems . ("x86_64-linux"))
;; This fails on 7c02eb6
(manifests . (("my-guixsd-config" . "hello.scm")))
))
(#:inputs . (
((#:name . "guix")
(#:url . "git://git.savannah.gnu.org/guix.git")
(#:load-path . ".")
;;(#:branch . "master")
(#:commit .
"7c02eb6c8d7d050ecb8f3082c4a754ad32211403")

((#:name . "my-guix-packages")
(#:url . "file:///home/cuirass/my-guix-packages")
(#:load-path . "packages")
(#:branch . "master")
(#:no-compile? . #t))

((#:name . "my-guixsd-config")
(#:url . "file:///home/cuirass/my-guixsd-config.sh")
(#:load-path . "manifests")
(#:branch . "master")
(#:no-compile? . #t))

))
(#:build-outputs . ()))
))

============================
And the evaluations file content
============================

gzip --decompress -c /var/log/cuirass/evaluations/1.gz
warning:
building things during evaluation
'build-things' arguments:
(("/gnu/store/qhm7xsikyykvjisi8kbmzp8ny3cmf370-compute-guix-derivation.drv")
0)
Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'...
warning:
building things during evaluation
'build-things' arguments:
(("/gnu/store/ps30mn7xq0ymcrdzlwim8pkv1czgv2zf-profile.drv") 0)
ERROR: In procedure read:
In procedure scm_lreadr: #<unknown port>:16:634: Unknown # object: #\<



Best regards,
David Larsson
M
M
Mathieu Othacehe wrote on 2 Nov 2020 21:12
(name . david larsson)(address . david.larsson@selfhosted.xyz)(address . 44399@debbugs.gnu.org)
87tuu7a57u.fsf@gnu.org
Hello David,

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> (("/gnu/store/ps30mn7xq0ymcrdzlwim8pkv1czgv2zf-profile.drv") 0)
> ERROR: In procedure read:
> In procedure scm_lreadr: #<unknown port>:16:634: Unknown # object: #\<

This is probably a consequence of me breaking things today. I restored
the original handling of package licenses with b5f2a035.

This means that you need to uses non "#f" licenses in your custom
packages to avoid the issue you encountered in

Could you please confirm that it works?

Thanks,

Mathieu
D
D
david larsson wrote on 3 Nov 2020 08:07
(name . Mathieu Othacehe)(address . othacehe@gnu.org)
01466894f6c4942d879d833cedafc83e@selfhosted.xyz
On 2020-11-02 20:12, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:
Toggle quote (4 lines)
>
> Could you please confirm that it works?
>

It does not. Building from manifest gives no error at all but goes
stale. The last output line in /var/log/cuirass.log is just:

2020-11-03T07:57:46 evaluating spec 'my-pkgs'

htop shows no cpu usage.



Building packages with #f licenses throws the same error again as in
#44370.



Packages are otherwise built but reported as failed, as in
D
D
david larsson wrote on 3 Nov 2020 17:04
(name . Mathieu Othacehe)(address . othacehe@gnu.org)(address . 44399@debbugs.gnu.org)
56be256fb43eff17ee6ff4ac7ba90141@selfhosted.xyz
On 2020-11-02 20:12, Mathieu Othacehe wrote:

Toggle quote (8 lines)
>
> Could you please confirm that it works?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu


Things do work now. I had made a mistake in my config.

In case it helps someone; to fix it, I changed my-guixsd-config input
load path to ".":

((#:name . "config")
(#:url . "file:///home/cuirass/my-guixsd-config.sh")
(#:load-path . ".")
(#:branch . "master")
(#:no-compile? . #t))

and in proc-args I changed the manifests path, and made sure "manifests"
has quotes around it, so I changed it to:

(#:proc-args .
((subset . "manifests")
(systems . ("x86_64-linux"))
(manifests . (("config" . "manifests/user1.scm")))
))

which now built over 200 packages successfully, yay!


Thanks for your help Mathieu!

Best regards,
David
M
M
Mathieu Othacehe wrote on 25 Mar 2021 14:48
(name . david larsson)(address . david.larsson@selfhosted.xyz)(address . 44399-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87eeg34a49.fsf@gnu.org
Hello,

As the specification format is completely new and the evaluation process
has been rewritten, I think we can close this one.

Thanks,

Mathieu
Closed
?