Patch file names too long

DoneSubmitted by Ludovic Courtès.
Details
2 participants
  • Brett Gilio
  • Ludovic Courtès
Owner
unassigned
Severity
normal
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 1 Oct 2020 12:26
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
87a6x6utrj.fsf@gnu.org
There are several patch file names that are too long for ‘tar’, as
reported during ‘make dist’:

Toggle snippet (7 lines)
tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/ocaml-bisect-fix-camlp4-in-another-directory.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-signature-of-multiplyCheckOverflow.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python2-pygobject-2-gi-info-type-error-domain.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-division-by-zero-BlockCodec-runPull.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python-robotframework-honor-source-date-epoch.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita

‘guix lint’ reports it as well, but apparently this is easily
overlooked.

Ludo’.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 1 Oct 2020 14:35
control message for bug #43738
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
871riit98n.fsf@gnu.org
tags 43738 + easy
quit
B
B
Brett Gilio wrote on 2 Oct 2020 04:36
Re: bug#43738: Patch file names too long
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)(address . 43738@debbugs.gnu.org)
87tuvdxsjn.fsf@debian
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

Toggle quote (14 lines)
> There are several patch file names that are too long for ‘tar’, as
> reported during ‘make dist’:
>
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/ocaml-bisect-fix-camlp4-in-another-directory.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-signature-of-multiplyCheckOverflow.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python2-pygobject-2-gi-info-type-error-domain.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-division-by-zero-BlockCodec-runPull.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python-robotframework-honor-source-date-epoch.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
>
> ‘guix lint’ reports it as well, but apparently this is easily
> overlooked.
>
> Ludo’.

Does it matter that this is coming from a dirty working tree? Maybe not.

Brett Gilio
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 3 Oct 2020 11:03
(name . Brett Gilio)(address . brettg@gnu.org)(address . 43738@debbugs.gnu.org)
87tuvbheb8.fsf@gnu.org
Brett Gilio <brettg@gnu.org> skribis:

Toggle quote (18 lines)
> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> There are several patch file names that are too long for ‘tar’, as
>> reported during ‘make dist’:
>>
>> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/ocaml-bisect-fix-camlp4-in-another-directory.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
>> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-signature-of-multiplyCheckOverflow.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
>> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python2-pygobject-2-gi-info-type-error-domain.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
>> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-division-by-zero-BlockCodec-runPull.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
>> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python-robotframework-honor-source-date-epoch.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
>>
>> ‘guix lint’ reports it as well, but apparently this is easily
>> overlooked.
>>
>> Ludo’.
>
> Does it matter that this is coming from a dirty working tree? Maybe not.

Nope, it doesn’t matter.

Ludo’.
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 10 Nov 2020 18:01
(address . 43738-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87h7pxno1r.fsf@gnu.org
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

Toggle quote (9 lines)
> There are several patch file names that are too long for ‘tar’, as
> reported during ‘make dist’:
>
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/ocaml-bisect-fix-camlp4-in-another-directory.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-signature-of-multiplyCheckOverflow.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python2-pygobject-2-gi-info-type-error-domain.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/audiofile-division-by-zero-BlockCodec-runPull.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita
> tar: guix-1.0.1.22624-c258f1-dirty/gnu/packages/patches/python-robotframework-honor-source-date-epoch.patch dosiernomo tro longas (maks 99); ne ŝutita

Fixed by:

8515ea12d2 gnu: audiofile: Shorten patch file names.
74361d3ee8 gnu: python2-pygobject@2: Shorten patch file name.
f161bd2cd7 gnu: Remove unused patch.
ab96f929c6 gnu: python-robotframework: Shorten patch file name.

Ludo’.
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send email to 43738@debbugs.gnu.org