g++ does not provide std::fegetround

Andreas Enge wrote on 23 Sep 2020 18:21

Recipients:(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)

Message-ID:20200923162121.GA28654@jurong

Hello,

this report is related to
   https://github.com/fplll/fplll/issues/444

The following test file round.cpp does not compile with our g++-10.2.0:
#include <cfenv>
int main () {
   return std::fegetround ();
}


Compilation (also when adding "--std=c++11") prints the error:
round.cpp: In function 'int main()':
round.cpp:4:16: error: 'fegetround' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'fegetround'?
    4 |    return std::fegetround ();
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /home/andreas/.guix-profile/include/c++/fenv.h:36,
                 from /home/andreas/.guix-profile/include/c++/cfenv:41,
                 from round.cpp:1:
/home/andreas/.guix-profile/include/fenv.h:104:12: note: 'fegetround' declared here
  104 | extern int fegetround (void) __THROW __attribute_pure__;
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~

Compilation succeeds when replacing std::fegetround by fegetround; however,
the former is supposedly part of the C++11 standard.

The culprit is apparently cfenv, which contains the following:
#if _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FENV_H
#include_next <fenv.h>
#endif
#if _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FENV_TR1
...
#undef fegetround
...
namespace std
{
...
using ::fegetround;
...
}


Our include/c++/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/c++config.h has this:
#define _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FENV_H 1
/* Define if C99 functions in <fenv.h> should be imported in <tr1/cfenv> in
namespace std::tr1. */
/* #undef _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FENV_TR1 */
whereas apparently on other distributions (opensuse, for instance),
_GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FENV_TR1 is defined and leads to std::fesetround being
defined.


And when I look at the build log
   https://ci.guix.gnu.org/log/xpdy9vvqym9xv7praqkwsm3gdzn2kv1p-gcc-10.2.0
for instance, there are the following lines:
checking for ISO C99 support to TR1 in <fenv.h>... no
checking for ISO C99 support to TR1 in <stdint.h>... yes
checking for ISO C99 support to TR1 in <math.h>... yes
checking for ISO C99 support to TR1 in <inttypes.h>... yes
whereas in opensuse, there is
checking for ISO C99 support to TR1 in <fenv.h>... yes

Now it would be interesting to have a look at config.log for gcc...

Andreas

Andreas Enge wrote on 23 Sep 2020 18:36

Recipients:(address . 43579@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:20200923163632.GA7348@jurong

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 06:21:21PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:

Toggle quote (2 lines)

> Now it would be interesting to have a look at config.log for gcc...

I did so with gcc-10.2.0 and executed ./configure in the subdirectory
libstdc++-v3. The relevant part of config.log is this:
configure:16462: checking for ISO C99 support to TR1 in <fenv.h>
configure:16490: g++ -c  -std=c++98  conftest.cpp >&5
configure:16490: $? = 0
configure:16497: result: yes

This is when trying to compile gcc-10.2.0 with gcc-10.2.0; so somehow
our bootstrapping process does something differently when creating the
final user facing gcc.

Andreas

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 23 Sep 2020 21:03

Recipients:(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)(address . 43579@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:875z84gvs5.fsf@elephly.net

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (24 lines)> Hello,
>
> this report is related to
>    https://github.com/fplll/fplll/issues/444
>
> The following test file round.cpp does not compile with our g++-10.2.0:
> #include <cfenv>
> int main () {
>    return std::fegetround ();
> }
>
>
> Compilation (also when adding "--std=c++11") prints the error:
> round.cpp: In function 'int main()':
> round.cpp:4:16: error: 'fegetround' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'fegetround'?
>     4 |    return std::fegetround ();
>       |                ^~~~~~~~~~
> In file included from /home/andreas/.guix-profile/include/c++/fenv.h:36,
>                  from /home/andreas/.guix-profile/include/c++/cfenv:41,
>                  from round.cpp:1:
> /home/andreas/.guix-profile/include/fenv.h:104:12: note: 'fegetround' declared here
>   104 | extern int fegetround (void) __THROW __attribute_pure__;
>       |            ^~~~~~~~~~

Is this perhaps related to https://issues.guix.gnu.org/42392?

Ricardo

Andreas Enge wrote on 23 Sep 2020 22:05

Recipients:(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)(address . 43579@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:20200923200543.GA9839@jurong

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 09:03:54PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:

Toggle quote (2 lines)

> Is this perhaps related to https://issues.guix.gnu.org/42392?

It looks very similar indeed. But then the fix given there has not fixed

my problem, which occurs in a current gcc-toolchain.

Andreas

Andreas Enge wrote on 23 Sep 2020 22:20

Recipients:(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)(address . 43579@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:20200923202011.GA17102@jurong

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:05:43PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:

Toggle quote (3 lines)

> It looks very similar indeed. But then the fix given there has not fixed

> my problem, which occurs in a current gcc-toolchain.

My impression is that the root cause is the same one, that we are somehow

misconfiguring our gcc builds, as discussed in this thread:

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-06/msg00096.html

And that the hacky fix works for the other problems, but apparently not

for this one.

Andreas

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 23 Sep 2020 23:28

Recipients:(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)(address . 43579@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:873638gp2z.fsf@elephly.net

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

Toggle quote (11 lines)> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:05:43PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> It looks very similar indeed. But then the fix given there has not fixed
>> my problem, which occurs in a current gcc-toolchain.
>
> My impression is that the root cause is the same one, that we are somehow
> misconfiguring our gcc builds, as discussed in this thread:
>    https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2020-06/msg00096.html
>
> And that the hacky fix works for the other problems, but apparently not
> for this one.

I’m having a different but possibly related problem with

arm-none-eabi-nano-toolchain-7-2018-q2-update, which used to work some

time ago (in axoloti-patcher-next).

For that issue the hack also did not work.

Ricardo

Maxim Cournoyer wrote on 24 Sep 2020 06:48

control message for bug #43579

Recipients:(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87k0wjvkye.fsf@gmail.com

severity 43579 important

quit

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 1 Oct 2020 14:36

Re: bug#43579: g++ does not provide std::fegetround

Recipients:(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)(address . 43579@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:87wo0arulv.fsf@gnu.org

Hallo!

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

Toggle quote (6 lines)

> The following test file round.cpp does not compile with our g++-10.2.0:

> #include <cfenv>

> int main () {

> return std::fegetround ();

> }

Could you provide detailed steps to reproduce it?

Thanks,

Ludo’.

Brett Gilio wrote on 2 Oct 2020 04:39

Recipients:(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)

Message-ID:87o8llxsew.fsf@debian

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

Toggle quote (15 lines)> Hallo!
>
> Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
>
>> The following test file round.cpp does not compile with our g++-10.2.0:
>> #include <cfenv>
>> int main () {
>>    return std::fegetround ();
>> }
>
> Could you provide detailed steps to reproduce it?
>
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.

I believe `std::fegetround` was introduced in C++11, are you using the

appropriate flag?

Brett Gilio

Andreas Enge wrote on 2 Oct 2020 20:06

Recipients:(name . Brett Gilio)(address . brettg@gnu.org)

Message-ID:20201002180621.GA4862@jurong

Hello,

On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:39:35PM -0500, Brett Gilio wrote:

Toggle quote (8 lines)

> >> The following test file round.cpp does not compile with our g++-10.2.0:

> >> #include <cfenv>

> >> int main () {

> >> return std::fegetround ();

> >> }

> >

> > Could you provide detailed steps to reproduce it?

well, just put these lines into a file called "round.cpp" (as attached),
and then
   gcc round.cpp
produces
round.cpp: In function 'int main()':
round.cpp:3:16: error: 'fegetround' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'fegetround'?
    3 |    return std::fegetround ();
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /home/andreas/.guix-profile/include/c++/fenv.h:36,
                 from /home/andreas/.guix-profile/include/c++/cfenv:41,
                 from round.cpp:1:
/home/andreas/.guix-profile/include/fenv.h:104:12: note: 'fegetround' declared here
  104 | extern int fegetround (void) __THROW __attribute_pure__;
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~

On Thu, Oct 01, 2020 at 09:39:35PM -0500, Brett Gilio wrote:

Toggle quote (3 lines)

> I believe `std::fegetround` was introduced in C++11, are you using the

> appropriate flag?

And then you can use any of
   gcc --std=c++17 round.cpp
   gcc --std=c++14 round.cpp
   gcc --std=c++11 round.cpp
with the same outcome.

The issue
   https://github.com/fplll/fplll/issues/444
I referenced in my bug report provides more discussion; the outcome was that
it is a bug in Guix. I will try to summarise it in the following to make this
bug report self-contained; all file and directory names are relative to
`guix build gcc-toolchain`.

include/c++/cfenv does this around line 41:
#if _GLIBCXX_HAVE_FENV_H
# include <fenv.h>
#endif

include/c++/fenv.h has this in line 34:
#include <bits/c++config.h>

include/c++/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bits/c++config.h has this around line 28:
/* Define if C99 functions in <fenv.h> should be imported in <tr1/cfenv> in
   namespace std::tr1. */
/* #undef _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FENV_TR1 */

And back to include/c++/fenv.h from line 41 on:
#if _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FENV_TR1
#undef feclearexcept
#undef fegetexceptflag
#undef feraiseexcept
#undef fesetexceptflag
#undef fetestexcept
#undef fegetround
#undef fesetround
...
namespace std
{
...
  using ::fegetround;
  using ::fesetround;
...
}
#endif // _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FENV_TR1

The difference to the Opensuse headers is that in bits/c++config.h,
they define _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FENV_TR1, which, as I understand it,
removes the fe* functions from the global namespace to put them back into
the std:: namespace.

This should happen somewhere in a configure phase inside the gcc build, but
I do not know how to obtain the config.log file easily (short of adding a
phase "(const #f)" to the build recipe and doing a "guix build -K").

Andreas

#include <cfenv>
int main () {
   return std::fegetround ();
}

Ludovic Courtès wrote on 3 Oct 2020 12:02

Recipients:(name . Andreas Enge)(address . andreas@enge.fr)

Message-ID:87362vhbkl.fsf@gnu.org

Hi,

(Cc’ing Maxim who’s looked into this before.)

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

Toggle quote (4 lines)

> well, just put these lines into a file called "round.cpp" (as attached),

> and then

> gcc round.cpp

Ah yes, I wasn’t sure if this was ‘gcc-toolchain’ or not. Only 7.x (the

current ‘gcc-final’) works:

Toggle snippet (26 lines)$ cat t.cpp
#include <cfenv>
int main () {
   return std::fegetround ();
}

$ guix environment -C --ad-hoc gcc-toolchain@7 -- g++ -Wall -c t.cpp
$ guix environment -C --ad-hoc gcc-toolchain -- g++ -Wall -c t.cpp
t.cpp: In function 'int main()':
t.cpp:3:16: error: 'fegetround' is not a member of 'std'; did you mean 'fegetround'?
    3 |    return std::fegetround ();
      |                ^~~~~~~~~~
In file included from /gnu/store/maa9v3r0l3kzi9y20mz5m5c1f83m75n5-profile/include/c++/fenv.h:36,
                 from /gnu/store/maa9v3r0l3kzi9y20mz5m5c1f83m75n5-profile/include/c++/cfenv:41,
                 from t.cpp:1:
/gnu/store/maa9v3r0l3kzi9y20mz5m5c1f83m75n5-profile/include/fenv.h:104:12: note: 'fegetround' declared here
  104 | extern int fegetround (void) __THROW __attribute_pure__;
      |            ^~~~~~~~~~
$ guix describe
Generacio 162   Oct 01 2020 00:23:38    (nuna)
  guix 7607ace
    repository URL: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git
    branch: master
    commit: 7607ace5091aea0157ba5c8a508129cc5fc4f931

It’s the same story as https://issues.guix.gnu.org/42392.

Toggle quote (5 lines)

> The difference to the Opensuse headers is that in bits/c++config.h,

> they define _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_FENV_TR1, which, as I understand it,

> removes the fe* functions from the global namespace to put them back into

> the std:: namespace.

Indeed, the build log of ‘gcc-10’ for instance has this:

Toggle snippet (11 lines)checking fenv.h usability... yes
checking fenv.h presence... yes
checking for fenv.h... yes
checking for complex.h... (cached) yes
checking for complex.h... (cached) yes
checking for ISO C99 support to TR1 in <complex.h>... yes
checking for ISO C99 support to TR1 in <ctype.h>... yes
checking for fenv.h... (cached) yes
checking for ISO C99 support to TR1 in <fenv.h>... no

Here’s the ‘prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/config.log’

excerpt:

Toggle snippet (175 lines)configure:16448: checking for fenv.h
configure:16448: result: yes
configure:16462: checking for ISO C99 support to TR1 in <fenv.h>
configure:16490:  /tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/build/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc -B/tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/build/./gcc -nostdinc++ -L/tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src -L/tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -L/tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -B/gnu/store/xpdy9vvqym9xv7praqkwsm3gdzn2kv1p-gcc-10.2.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/gnu/store/xpdy9vvqym9xv7praqkwsm3gdzn2kv1p-gcc-10.2.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /gnu/store/xpdy9vvqym9xv7praqkwsm3gdzn2kv1p-gcc-10.2.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /gnu/store/xpdy9vvqym9xv7praqkwsm3gdzn2kv1p-gcc-10.2.0/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include   -fno-checking -c -g -O2 -D_GNU_SOURCE -std=c++98  conftest.cpp >&5
conftest.cpp: In function 'int main()':
conftest.cpp:102:7: error: 'fexcept_t' was not declared in this scope; did you mean 'except'?
  102 |       fexcept_t* pflag;
      |       ^~~~~~~~~
      |       except
conftest.cpp:102:18: error: 'pflag' was not declared in this scope
  102 |       fexcept_t* pflag;
      |                  ^~~~~
conftest.cpp:103:7: error: 'fenv_t' was not declared in this scope
  103 |       fenv_t* penv;
      |       ^~~~~~
conftest.cpp:103:15: error: 'penv' was not declared in this scope
  103 |       fenv_t* penv;
      |               ^~~~
conftest.cpp:105:13: error: 'feclearexcept' was not declared in this scope
  105 |       ret = feclearexcept(except);
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
conftest.cpp:106:13: error: 'fegetexceptflag' was not declared in this scope
  106 |       ret = fegetexceptflag(pflag, except);
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
conftest.cpp:107:13: error: 'feraiseexcept' was not declared in this scope
  107 |       ret = feraiseexcept(except);
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
conftest.cpp:108:13: error: 'fesetexceptflag' was not declared in this scope
  108 |       ret = fesetexceptflag(pflag, except);
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
conftest.cpp:109:13: error: 'fetestexcept' was not declared in this scope
  109 |       ret = fetestexcept(except);
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~
conftest.cpp:110:13: error: 'fegetround' was not declared in this scope
  110 |       ret = fegetround();
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~
conftest.cpp:111:13: error: 'fesetround' was not declared in this scope
  111 |       ret = fesetround(mode);
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~
conftest.cpp:112:13: error: 'fegetenv' was not declared in this scope
  112 |       ret = fegetenv(penv);
      |             ^~~~~~~~
conftest.cpp:113:13: error: 'feholdexcept' was not declared in this scope
  113 |       ret = feholdexcept(penv);
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~~
conftest.cpp:114:13: error: 'fesetenv' was not declared in this scope
  114 |       ret = fesetenv(penv);
      |             ^~~~~~~~
conftest.cpp:115:13: error: 'feupdateenv' was not declared in this scope
  115 |       ret = feupdateenv(penv);
      |             ^~~~~~~~~~~
configure:16490: $? = 1
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "package-unused"
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "libstdc++"
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION "version-unused"
| #define PACKAGE_STRING "package-unused version-unused"
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT ""
| #define PACKAGE_URL ""
| #define STDC_HEADERS 1
| #define HAVE_SYS_TYPES_H 1
| #define HAVE_SYS_STAT_H 1
| #define HAVE_STDLIB_H 1
| #define HAVE_STRING_H 1
| #define HAVE_MEMORY_H 1
| #define HAVE_STRINGS_H 1
| #define HAVE_INTTYPES_H 1
| #define HAVE_STDINT_H 1
| #define HAVE_UNISTD_H 1
| #define HAVE_DLFCN_H 1
| #define LT_OBJDIR ".libs/"
| #define _GLIBCXX_HOSTED 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_VERBOSE 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_ATOMIC_BUILTINS 1
| #define HAVE_ATOMIC_LOCK_POLICY 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_USE_DECIMAL_FLOAT 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_USE_INT128 1
| #define HAVE_STRXFRM_L 1
| #define HAVE_STRERROR_L 1
| #define HAVE_STRERROR_R 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_USE_LONG_LONG 1
| #define HAVE_WCHAR_H 1
| #define HAVE_MBSTATE_T 1
| #define HAVE_WCTYPE_H 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_USE_WCHAR_T 1
| #define _GLIBCXX98_USE_C99_MATH 1
| #define HAVE_TGMATH_H 1
| #define HAVE_COMPLEX_H 1
| #define _GLIBCXX98_USE_C99_COMPLEX 1
| #define _GLIBCXX98_USE_C99_STDIO 1
| #define _GLIBCXX98_USE_C99_STDLIB 1
| #define HAVE_VFWSCANF 1
| #define HAVE_VSWSCANF 1
| #define HAVE_VWSCANF 1
| #define HAVE_WCSTOF 1
| #define HAVE_ISWBLANK 1
| #define _GLIBCXX98_USE_C99_WCHAR 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_USE_C99 1
| #define _GLIBCXX11_USE_C99_MATH 1
| #define HAVE_TGMATH_H 1
| #define HAVE_COMPLEX_H 1
| #define _GLIBCXX11_USE_C99_COMPLEX 1
| #define _GLIBCXX11_USE_C99_STDIO 1
| #define _GLIBCXX11_USE_C99_STDLIB 1
| #define HAVE_VFWSCANF 1
| #define HAVE_VSWSCANF 1
| #define HAVE_VWSCANF 1
| #define HAVE_WCSTOF 1
| #define HAVE_ISWBLANK 1
| #define _GLIBCXX11_USE_C99_WCHAR 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING 0
| #define HAVE_GETS 1
| #define HAVE_EOWNERDEAD 1
| #define HAVE_ENOTRECOVERABLE 1
| #define HAVE_ENOLINK 1
| #define HAVE_EPROTO 1
| #define HAVE_ENODATA 1
| #define HAVE_ENOSR 1
| #define HAVE_ENOSTR 1
| #define HAVE_ETIME 1
| #define HAVE_EBADMSG 1
| #define HAVE_ECANCELED 1
| #define HAVE_EOVERFLOW 1
| #define HAVE_ENOTSUP 1
| #define HAVE_EIDRM 1
| #define HAVE_ETXTBSY 1
| #define HAVE_ECHILD 1
| #define HAVE_ENOSPC 1
| #define HAVE_EPERM 1
| #define HAVE_ETIMEDOUT 1
| #define HAVE_EWOULDBLOCK 1
| #define HAVE_UCHAR_H 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_USE_C11_UCHAR_CXX11 1
| #define HAVE_INT64_T 1
| #define HAVE_INT64_T_LONG 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_USE_LFS 1
| #define HAVE_SYS_IOCTL_H 1
| #define HAVE_POLL 1
| #define HAVE_S_ISREG 1
| #define HAVE_SYS_UIO_H 1
| #define HAVE_WRITEV 1
| #define HAVE_FENV_H 1
| #define HAVE_COMPLEX_H 1
| #define HAVE_COMPLEX_H 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_COMPLEX_TR1 1
| #define _GLIBCXX_USE_C99_CTYPE_TR1 1
| #define HAVE_FENV_H 1
| /* end confdefs.h.  */
| #include <fenv.h>
| int
| main ()
| {
| int except, mode;
| 		    fexcept_t* pflag;
| 		    fenv_t* penv;
| 		    int ret;
| 		    ret = feclearexcept(except);
| 		    ret = fegetexceptflag(pflag, except);
| 		    ret = feraiseexcept(except);
| 		    ret = fesetexceptflag(pflag, except);
| 		    ret = fetestexcept(except);
| 		    ret = fegetround();
| 		    ret = fesetround(mode);
| 		    ret = fegetenv(penv);
| 		    ret = feholdexcept(penv);
| 		    ret = fesetenv(penv);
| 		    ret = feupdateenv(penv);
| 
|   ;
|   return 0;
| }
configure:16497: result: no

The same program builds fine outside.

Turns out GCC provides <fenv.h>, too:

Toggle snippet (8 lines)

$ find /tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/ -name fenv.h

/tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/gcc-10.2.0/fixincludes/tests/base/bits/fenv.h

/tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/gcc-10.2.0/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/fenv.h

/tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/gcc-10.2.0/libstdc++-v3/include/c_compatibility/fenv.h

/tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/build/prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/tr1/fenv.h

/tmp/guix-build-gcc-10.2.0.drv-0/build/prev-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/fenv.h

So this is again #include_next not picking the right <fenv.h> due to

search path ordering issues and/or duplicate entries.

Thoughts anyone?

I think we need a proper fix but the feedback we got from GCC folks last

time didn’t give me much insight as to what we should do.

Toggle quote (4 lines)

> This should happen somewhere in a configure phase inside the gcc build, but

> I do not know how to obtain the config.log file easily (short of adding a

> phase "(const #f)" to the build recipe and doing a "guix build -K").

I do:

guix build -e '(@ (gnu packages gcc) gcc-10)' --no-grafts --check -K

Then I hit C-c once the relevant ‘configure’ has run (you can check

what’s in /tmp/guix-build-gcc-10*). :-)

Thanks,

Ludo’.

Miguel Ángel Arruga Vivas wrote on 13 Nov 2020 18:59

Recipients:(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)

Message-ID:87r1oxyw6e.fsf@gmail.com

Hi!

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

Toggle quote (11 lines)>[...]
> It’s the same story as <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/42392>.
>[...]
> So this is again #include_next not picking the right <fenv.h> due to
> search path ordering issues and/or duplicate entries.
>
> Thoughts anyone?
>
> I think we need a proper fix but the feedback we got from GCC folks last
> time didn’t give me much insight as to what we should do.

AFAIR, the issue comes from using XXX_INCLUDE_PATH instead of CPATH
because it includes gcc predefined paths:
  1. The order matters.
  2. The internal order may need duplicated paths.
  3. Even providing the right duplicated paths through these variables
  may not be supported may not work, it's an implementation detail after
  all.

This was changed because we wanted to avoid warnings on installed
libraries which could be raised to errors with -Werror.  I personally
don't like that approach, as the included headers are being compiled in
that moment so I think the -Werror should apply too, but indeed I
understand the reasons behind the compatibility with FHS.

The problem comes to generalizing this approach: there should be inputs
that must not enter the realm of these variables, mainly gcc and libc,
libc:static, libstdc++, and so on.

The attached WIP-patch would be a rough approach to that, but it will
take some time until I recompile the world to really test it.  Also this
isn't the best approach as the manifests shouldn't include these
neither, but I still don't find where and how to mark these inputs
cleanly.

WDYT?  Any idea is welcome. :-)

Happy hacking!
Miguel

From ad2e859589ccbd5e9310a921355ef5e7f4926d80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Miguel=20=C3=81ngel=20Arruga=20Vivas?=
 <rosen644835@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 18:27:03 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] build-system/gnu: Remove libc, libstdc++ and gcc from include
 paths.

* guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm (set-paths)[include-input?]
[include-var?]: New predicates.
[inputs->directories, native-inputs->directories]: Extract code from ...
[input-directories, native-input-directories]: ... here.
[include-directories, native-include-directories]: New variables.
<body>: Select between input-directories, native-input-directories or
include-directories, native-include-directories depending on the
environment variable to set.
---
 guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (80 lines)diff --git a/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm b/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm
index 2e7dff2034..2f8da33066 100644
--- a/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm
+++ b/guix/build/gnu-build-system.scm
@@ -72,18 +72,35 @@ See https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/."
 (define* (set-paths #:key target inputs native-inputs
                     (search-paths '()) (native-search-paths '())
                     #:allow-other-keys)
-  (define input-directories
-    (match inputs
+  (define (include-input? input)
+    (let ((compiler-internals '("libc" "libc:static" "libstdc++" "gcc")))
+      (match input
+        ((name . _)
+         (not (member name compiler-internals))))))
+
+  (define (inputs->directories obj)
+    (match obj
       (((_ . dir) ...)
        dir)))
 
-  (define native-input-directories
-    (match native-inputs
+  (define (native-inputs->directories obj)
+    (match obj
       (((_ . dir) ...)
        dir)
       (#f                                         ; not cross compiling
        '())))
 
+  (define input-directories (inputs->directories inputs))
+  (define native-input-directories (native-inputs->directories native-inputs))
+
+  (define (include-var? var)
+    (string-suffix? var "_INCLUDE_PATH"))
+  (define include-directories
+    (inputs->directories (filter include-input? inputs)))
+  (define native-include-directories
+    (native-inputs->directories (filter include-input? native-inputs)))
+
+
   ;; Tell 'ld-wrapper' to disallow non-store libraries.
   (setenv "GUIX_LD_WRAPPER_ALLOW_IMPURITIES" "no")
 
@@ -98,10 +115,12 @@ See https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/."
   (for-each (match-lambda
              ((env-var (files ...) separator type pattern)
               (set-path-environment-variable env-var files
-                                             input-directories
-                                             #:separator separator
-                                             #:type type
-                                             #:pattern pattern)))
+                                             (if (include-var? env-var)
+                                                 include-directories
+                                                 input-directories)
+                                                 #:separator separator
+                                                 #:type type
+                                                 #:pattern pattern)))
             search-paths)
 
   (when native-search-paths
@@ -109,10 +128,12 @@ See https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/."
     (for-each (match-lambda
                ((env-var (files ...) separator type pattern)
                 (set-path-environment-variable env-var files
-                                               native-input-directories
-                                               #:separator separator
-                                               #:type type
-                                               #:pattern pattern)))
+                                             (if (include-var? env-var)
+                                                 native-include-directories
+                                                 native-input-directories)
+                                                 #:separator separator
+                                                 #:type type
+                                                 #:pattern pattern)))
               native-search-paths))
 
   #t)
-- 
2.29.2

Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 27 Dec 2021 22:48

g++ does not provide std::fegetround

Recipients:(address . 43579@debbugs.gnu.org)(address . rosen644835@gmail.com)

Message-ID:87bl11k98f.fsf@elephly.net

Hi,

I just rediscovered this issue by adding “gcc-7” to a package’s input

without also adjusting the variable that determines the order of

includes. (I ended up not needing to use GCC 7 in the end.)

Seeing that issue #42392 (“GCC includes ordering issue? g++: error:

'round' is not a member of 'std'”) has since been solved, should we

close this issue, too?

Or are there still reasons to want an adjustment of the

gnu-build-system? What do you think, Miguel?

Ricardo

Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send email to 43579@debbugs.gnu.org

is:open	open issues
is:done	closed issues
submitter:<who>	search issue submitter
author:<who>	search by message author
date:yesterday..now	search by issue date
mdate:3m..2d	search by message date