r-rgraphviz is not Reproducible

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Ricardo Wurmus
  • zimoun
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
zimoun
Severity
normal
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 14 Sep 2020 17:21
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
CAJ3okZ3knt0xAWagwaxh_v8BMzut5kP4c54HQ0CUbXDPSysUWA@mail.gmail.com
Dear,

The package ’r-rgraphivz’ does not seems reproducible with Guix 4a2cb3f.

Toggle snippet (4 lines)
guix build r-rgraphivz
guix build r-rgraphivz --check --no-grafts -K

Then:

Toggle snippet (8 lines)
diff -r --no-dereference \
/gnu/store/rxp72c7yh1q1m1wc7wqr5gv4dfnp53d0-r-rgraphviz-2.32.0{,-check}

Binary files /gnu/store/rxp72c7yh1q1m1wc7wqr5gv4dfnp53d0-r-rgraphviz-2.32.0/site-library/Rgraphviz/libs/Rgraphviz.so
and /gnu/store/rxp72c7yh1q1m1wc7wqr5gv4dfnp53d0-r-rgraphviz-2.32.0-check/site-library/Rgraphviz/libs/Rgraphviz.so
differ

Well, I am not sure to correctly use diffoscope… it reports a lot of
differences.


All the best,
simon
R
R
Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 14 Sep 2020 21:27
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)(address . 43398-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87ft7kxipn.fsf@elephly.net
Hi simon,

Toggle quote (2 lines)
> The package ’r-rgraphivz’ does not seems reproducible with Guix 4a2cb3f.

It is now with commit 62881beb4d.

--
Ricardo
Closed
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 14 Sep 2020 21:47
(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)(address . 43398-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
CAJ3okZ1KrM00tp2RzU2K5WK32j3P5kqPC4nuoVruaEL2De7-=A@mail.gmail.com
Hey,

On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 at 21:25, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> > The package ’r-rgraphivz’ does not seems reproducible with Guix 4a2cb3f.
>
> It is now with commit 62881beb4d.

Cool!
Thank you.

For my learning process, how do you find it is a date issue? Read the
source and look for something? Or first have a clue with diffoscope?

Cheers,
simon
Closed
R
R
Ricardo Wurmus wrote on 14 Sep 2020 23:42
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)(address . 43398-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
877dswxcfm.fsf@elephly.net
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:

Toggle quote (3 lines)
> For my learning process, how do you find it is a date issue? Read the
> source and look for something? Or first have a clue with diffoscope?

I guessed it would be one of the usual suspects, so I unpacked the
sources and grep’ed for DATE. I only use diffoscope when there’s
nothing obvious in the source code.

--
Ricardo
Closed
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 14 Sep 2020 23:57
(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)(address . 43398-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
CAJ3okZ0A-pL7+3LtATh2Ki+7YV+aN9-baQ8chJwSC0B=_uvq2A@mail.gmail.com
Thanks for explaining.

Cheers,
simon
Closed
?