Hi, ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐On Friday, May 15, 2020 12:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Toggle quote (19 lines)> Hi,>> Ekaitz Zarraga email@example.com skribis:>> > > From 8bbac5bccdb0b2fd5ffa8fe1e2dec25a6a359810 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001> > > From: Ekaitz Zarraga firstname.lastname@example.org> > > Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 16:55:32 +0200> > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add openctm> >> > * gnu/packages/engineering.scm (openctm): New Variable.> >>> Applied with the cosmetic changes below, mostly indentation (consider> running ./etc/indent-code.el as mentioned in the manual).>> Thanks!>> Ludo’.
Thanks for the help Ludo (and the motivation!). I was wondering about if it's worth to separate the package in multiple outputs like: GUI for openctm files, openctm library and so on, as described here:https://guix.gnu.org/manual/en/html_node/Packages-with-Multiple-Outputs.html#Packages-with-Multiple-Outputs It has like a `tools` part and a `lib` part I'd say. Does it make sense for this package?It would avoid using GTK in the library part I think. I never did this before but looks like an option to reduce the package size (total: 830.2 MiB reported by guix size O_O). Opinions? Thanks!