[doc] Misspelled example in manual

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Gábor Boskovits
  • Danny Milosavljevic
  • Naga Malleswari
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Gábor Boskovits
Severity
normal
G
G
Gábor Boskovits wrote on 4 Feb 2020 15:04
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
CAE4v=phrC3HA8q_fRuN-NMF9Lu_PN_wjRxYci+vDgiWm7RD4BQ@mail.gmail.com
Tags: easy

Hello Guix,

In the manual, at base services:
file->udev-rule second example misspells user-account.

I file this as a bug so that we have a few easy for starting outreachy
applicants.

Best regards,
g_bor
--
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
N
N
Naga Malleswari wrote on 24 Mar 2020 07:04
(address . 39417@debbugs.gnu.org)
605bdd1c-97dc-08cd-092a-d848167affdc@riseup.net
Hi

I have made changes to the spelling mistake in example and submitting a
patch file. Please review and suggest changes.

--
Regards
NagaMalli
From 2f9874ac24a24322b2da64834e4d47b58093925f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Naga Malleswari <nagamalli@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:19:55 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Fix typo in example.

* doc/guix.texi (Base Services)[Scheme Procedure: file->udev-rule]: Correction to misspelt 'user-account'.
---
doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Toggle diff (15 lines)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 404a3e4777..b6a9c25037 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -12869,7 +12869,7 @@ well as in the @var{groups} field of the @var{operating-system} record.
(operating-system
;; @dots{}
- (users (cons (user-acount
+ (users (cons (user-account
;; @dots{}
(supplementary-groups
'("adbusers" ;for adb
--
2.25.1
D
D
Danny Milosavljevic wrote on 24 Mar 2020 13:12
(name . Naga Malleswari)(address . nagamalli@riseup.net)
20200324131213.37c74479@scratchpost.org
Hi Naga,

thanks for the patch!

Pushed to guix master as commit 54a9fe3429fc2d3978e8f56f972e3e1d50953c6a.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl55+R0ACgkQ5xo1VCww
uqVBCAf+My8U2KT9Li2GT/sAIOeediHM5UZE+c/zUw2v+M6C1lG5hGS54uDUv8Zd
o20yqq/2UCPucOyJsOkopayEyP1tYKkZuAMAerMGpaNhfG6Sc/Lsmv0dv7pQ8MHS
uARWOZonlPs3+jajzsjqBJnV5USW/auPHdGBN2xTnqMUAi+8WIy1exrPHhyzXkJK
jlZ7la83stQTJGFoE5ul3W4C76sQs4Kfn6VnxmQ5AJcSWhn8ung9fuSrmuuIdw29
OcKrXIhY1lovK3xpQTxO5IuTTvY5U8n1oshgRZgvIB3rQiqBhO+VbyAwjIoRJaox
qoTb2oXnxNiBhVxRUuxkjFPjmgv5dA==
=qx/t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 39417@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 39417
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch