[doc] Misspelled example in manual

DoneSubmitted by Gábor Boskovits.
Details
3 participants
  • Gábor Boskovits
  • Danny Milosavljevic
  • Naga Malleswari
Owner
unassigned
Severity
normal
G
G
Gábor Boskovits wrote on 4 Feb 2020 15:04
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
CAE4v=phrC3HA8q_fRuN-NMF9Lu_PN_wjRxYci+vDgiWm7RD4BQ@mail.gmail.com
Tags: easy

Hello Guix,

In the manual, at base services:
file->udev-rule second example misspells user-account.

I file this as a bug so that we have a few easy for starting outreachy
applicants.

Best regards,
g_bor
--
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
N
N
Naga Malleswari wrote on 24 Mar 2020 07:04
(address . 39417@debbugs.gnu.org)
605bdd1c-97dc-08cd-092a-d848167affdc@riseup.net
Hi

I have made changes to the spelling mistake in example and submitting a
patch file. Please review and suggest changes.

--
Regards
NagaMalli
From 2f9874ac24a24322b2da64834e4d47b58093925f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Naga Malleswari <nagamalli@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:19:55 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] doc: Fix typo in example.

* doc/guix.texi (Base Services)[Scheme Procedure: file->udev-rule]: Correction to misspelt 'user-account'.
---
doc/guix.texi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Toggle diff (15 lines)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index 404a3e4777..b6a9c25037 100644
--- a/doc/guix.texi
+++ b/doc/guix.texi
@@ -12869,7 +12869,7 @@ well as in the @var{groups} field of the @var{operating-system} record.
 
 (operating-system
   ;; @dots{}
-  (users (cons (user-acount
+  (users (cons (user-account
                 ;; @dots{}
                 (supplementary-groups
                  '("adbusers"   ;for adb
-- 
2.25.1
D
D
Danny Milosavljevic wrote on 24 Mar 2020 13:12
(name . Naga Malleswari)(address . nagamalli@riseup.net)
20200324131213.37c74479@scratchpost.org
Hi Naga,

thanks for the patch!

Pushed to guix master as commit 54a9fe3429fc2d3978e8f56f972e3e1d50953c6a.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEds7GsXJ0tGXALbPZ5xo1VCwwuqUFAl55+R0ACgkQ5xo1VCww
uqVBCAf+My8U2KT9Li2GT/sAIOeediHM5UZE+c/zUw2v+M6C1lG5hGS54uDUv8Zd
o20yqq/2UCPucOyJsOkopayEyP1tYKkZuAMAerMGpaNhfG6Sc/Lsmv0dv7pQ8MHS
uARWOZonlPs3+jajzsjqBJnV5USW/auPHdGBN2xTnqMUAi+8WIy1exrPHhyzXkJK
jlZ7la83stQTJGFoE5ul3W4C76sQs4Kfn6VnxmQ5AJcSWhn8ung9fuSrmuuIdw29
OcKrXIhY1lovK3xpQTxO5IuTTvY5U8n1oshgRZgvIB3rQiqBhO+VbyAwjIoRJaox
qoTb2oXnxNiBhVxRUuxkjFPjmgv5dA==
=qx/t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send email to 39417@debbugs.gnu.org