guix invocation induces guile locale error

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Bengt Richter
  • Gábor Boskovits
  • Ludovic Courtès
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Bengt Richter
Severity
normal

Debbugs page

Bengt Richter wrote 5 years ago
(name . New-Bug)(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
20191024111420.GA136867@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain
Attachment: file
Gábor Boskovits wrote 5 years ago
(address . 37900-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
CAE4v=piSRh6h0=8KJr+3EAKUB13MgnG02dHEji4omSFA9LXiYA@mail.gmail.com
Submitter requested to close the bug on #37914. Closing.

--
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
Attachment: file
Closed
Ludovic Courtès wrote 5 years ago
(address . 37900@debbugs.gnu.org)
87r230mu3r.fsf@gnu.org
Gábor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> skribis:

Toggle quote (2 lines)
> Submitter requested to close the bug on #37914. Closing.

You closed 37900 though, not 37914, or am I missing something?

Ludo’.
Gábor Boskovits wrote 5 years ago
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
CAE4v=pjTRukz6-Lh3g1B28V7k17Z_m1NbuQicbKFczw6EfH2MQ@mail.gmail.com
Sorry, maybe I was not clear on this. On 37914 there was a message that it
is ok to close 37900. See:

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. okt. 25., P, 22:46):

Toggle quote (10 lines)
> Gábor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > Submitter requested to close the bug on #37914. Closing.
>
> You closed 37900 though, not 37914, or am I missing something?
>
> Ludo’.
>


--
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
Attachment: file
Bengt Richter wrote 5 years ago
(name . Ludovic Courtès)(address . ludo@gnu.org)
20191025215948.GA103827@PhantoNv4ArchGx.localdomain
Hi Ludo,

On +2019-10-25 22:46:16 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Toggle quote (8 lines)
> Gábor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > Submitter requested to close the bug on #37914. Closing.
>
> You closed 37900 though, not 37914, or am I missing something?
>
> Ludo’.

Sorry, 37900 was mine, but (IIRC) trying to make a helpful comment
on 37914 that my 37900 might be relevant, I also mentioned
that recent fixes to guix had made my 37900 difficulties go away,
so closing 37900 would be ok by me. Gábor apparently picked up on that :)

I'm still curious about the avahi entaglement I demonstrated in 37900 though ;-)
--
Regards,
Bengt Richter
P.S. Is there a better way to post trying-to-be-helpful comments than to
add them to bug reports? Looking at archives, I see bits that could go
in turorials mixed with lots of friendly stuff that is just noise when
you want straight technical info.
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 37900@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 37900
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch
You may also tag this issue. See list of standard tags. For example, to set the confirmed and easy tags
mumi command -t +confirmed -t +easy
Or, remove the moreinfo tag and set the help tag
mumi command -t -moreinfo -t +help