"guix pull" fails because it cannot build a derivation

Dear guix team,

Today's "guix pull" ended in a failure that I am supposed to report, so

here I do!

Konrad.

$ guix pull

Updating channel 'guix' from Git repository at 'https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git'...

Building from this channel:

guix https://git.savannah.gnu.org/git/guix.git 6c177f6

The following derivations will be built:

/gnu/store/y899zgjln4qdqliwlmrnpwlhljagpzcp-module-import.drv

/gnu/store/w8c6is708k9cb87fc0kap13y9jf5h76m-module-import-compiled.drv

/gnu/store/8w23bahr7kj61w222x9iai9m0vagz58l-compute-guix-derivation.drv

building /gnu/store/y899zgjln4qdqliwlmrnpwlhljagpzcp-module-import.drv...

building /gnu/store/w8c6is708k9cb87fc0kap13y9jf5h76m-module-import-compiled.drv...

building /gnu/store/8w23bahr7kj61w222x9iai9m0vagz58l-compute-guix-derivation.drv...

Computing Guix derivation for 'x86_64-linux'... -Backtrace:

10 (primitive-load "/gnu/store/5fqbbg0wr2b71azi5n8k0iqfsls?")

In ice-9/eval.scm:

155:9 9 (_ _)

159:9 8 (_ #(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(#(?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?) ?))

In ./guix/store.scm:

1737:24 7 (run-with-store _ _ #:guile-for-build _ #:system _ # _)

In ./guix/self.scm:

988:2 6 (_ _)

In ./guix/packages.scm:

1309:17 5 (_ #<store-connection 256.99 260bfa0>)

934:16 4 (cache! #<weak-table 0/113> #<package guile@2.2.4 ./gn?> ?)

1255:22 3 (thunk)

934:16 2 (cache! #<weak-table 0/223> #<package guile@2.2.4 ./gn?> ?)

1039:46 1 (thunk)

In ./gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:

150:4 0 (inputs)

./gnu/packages/bootstrap.scm:150:4: In procedure inputs:

Wrong number of arguments to #<procedure inputs (x)>

guix pull: error: You found a bug: the program '/gnu/store/5fqbbg0wr2b71azi5n8k0iqfslsiwwi8-compute-guix-derivation'

failed to compute the derivation for Guix (version: "6c177f6140cba250ad68c5a83c312f395b6e48b4"; system: "x86_64-linux";

host version: "f347fb79df1b174c37a1d277b1c1de36684ed1e7"; pull-version: 1).

Please report it by email to <bug-guix@gnu.org>.

merge 34998 34997

merge 34998 34995

severity 34995 serious

Hi Konrad,

This has already been fixed. Please try again!

--

Ricardo

Hi Ricardo,

I had done so after reading Ludo's comment, and it works fine now!

Thanks,

Konrad.