guix commands should print a message, if they produce only trivial output by default

  • Open
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
2 participants
  • Björn Höfling
  • swedebugia
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Björn Höfling
Severity
normal
B
B
Björn Höfling wrote on 25 Feb 2019 17:24
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
20190225172456.242b2df0@alma-ubu
I noticed that if you call "guix COMMAND" for some COMMANDs without any
options given, they produce something which is not very useful to the
user. I first noticed it with guix pack:

When "guix pack" is run without any options, it builds an empty pack:

$ guix pack
/gnu/store/2ys9fn6h95209piqhyxli5pf2c4mp7zp-tarball-pack.tar.gz
$ tar tzvf /gnu/store/2ys9fn6h95209piqhyxli5pf2c4mp7zp-tarball-pack.tar.gz
drwxrwxr-t root/root 0 1970-01-01 01:00 ./gnu/store/
dr-xr-xr-x root/root 0 1970-01-01 01:00 ./gnu/store/w659mjmzwyhv62sd35y2pv5nrg5xkl7j-profile/
dr-xr-xr-x root/root 0 1970-01-01 01:00 ./gnu/store/w659mjmzwyhv62sd35y2pv5nrg5xkl7j-profile/etc/
-r--r--r-- root/root 414 1970-01-01 01:00 ./gnu/store/w659mjmzwyhv62sd35y2pv5nrg5xkl7j-profile/etc/profile
-r--r--r-- root/root 37 1970-01-01 01:00 ./gnu/store/w659mjmzwyhv62sd35y2pv5nrg5xkl7j-profile/manifest

I think from a user perspective it would be better to print a help
message and not build an empty pack.

On the other hand, I tried out other guix commands and at least it is a
consistent behaviour, they start with the default values, like "guix
graph" outputs just an empty graph.

"guix system" complains it needs a subcommand, which is a different
case.

But then again we have this complaint:

guix system container
guix system: error: wrong number of arguments for action 'container'

WDYT?

Björn
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iF0EARECAB0WIQQiGUP0np8nb5SZM4K/KGy2WT5f/QUCXHQW2AAKCRC/KGy2WT5f
/WmEAJwIIET9q/sUZ5MKQCb3aOg/arCFagCdEaILYWTvBC8v1rN+r8J0C+JqSSU=
=Hvlu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


S
S
swedebugia wrote on 1 Mar 2019 18:29
98955B3B-8AD5-4C65-B382-73624318B166@riseup.net
"Björn Höfling" <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de> skrev: (25 februari 2019 17:24:56 CET)
Toggle quote (39 lines)
>I noticed that if you call "guix COMMAND" for some COMMANDs without any
>options given, they produce something which is not very useful to the
>user. I first noticed it with guix pack:
>
>When "guix pack" is run without any options, it builds an empty pack:
>
>$ guix pack
>/gnu/store/2ys9fn6h95209piqhyxli5pf2c4mp7zp-tarball-pack.tar.gz
>$ tar tzvf
>/gnu/store/2ys9fn6h95209piqhyxli5pf2c4mp7zp-tarball-pack.tar.gz
>drwxrwxr-t root/root 0 1970-01-01 01:00 ./gnu/store/
>dr-xr-xr-x root/root 0 1970-01-01 01:00
>./gnu/store/w659mjmzwyhv62sd35y2pv5nrg5xkl7j-profile/
>dr-xr-xr-x root/root 0 1970-01-01 01:00
>./gnu/store/w659mjmzwyhv62sd35y2pv5nrg5xkl7j-profile/etc/
>-r--r--r-- root/root 414 1970-01-01 01:00
>./gnu/store/w659mjmzwyhv62sd35y2pv5nrg5xkl7j-profile/etc/profile
>-r--r--r-- root/root 37 1970-01-01 01:00
>./gnu/store/w659mjmzwyhv62sd35y2pv5nrg5xkl7j-profile/manifest
>
>I think from a user perspective it would be better to print a help
>message and not build an empty pack.
>
>On the other hand, I tried out other guix commands and at least it is a
>consistent behaviour, they start with the default values, like "guix
>graph" outputs just an empty graph.
>
>"guix system" complains it needs a subcommand, which is a different
>case.
>
>But then again we have this complaint:
>
>guix system container
>guix system: error: wrong number of arguments for action 'container'
>
>WDYT?
>
>Björn

I think we should print helpful hints or the contents of --help in these situations.
--
Sent from my k-9 mail for Android.
Attachment: file
?