Irrelevant narinfo signatures are honored

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
One participant
  • Ludovic Courtès
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Ludovic Courtès
Severity
important
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 13 Dec 2018 23:43
(name . Bug Guix)(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
875zvx9hes.fsf@gnu.org
Hello Guix,

‘guix substitute’ checks the signature over everything that precedes the
“Signature:” field of a narinfo:

(define (narinfo-sha256 narinfo)
"Return the sha256 hash of NARINFO as a bytevector, or #f if NARINFO lacks a
'Signature' field."
(let ((contents (narinfo-contents narinfo)))
(match (string-contains contents "Signature:")
(#f #f)
(index
(let ((above-signature (string-take contents index))) ;<-- here!
(sha256 (string->utf8 above-signature)))))))

(define* (valid-narinfo? narinfo #:optional (acl (current-acl))
#:key verbose?)
"Return #t if NARINFO's signature is not valid."
(or %allow-unauthenticated-substitutes?
(let ((hash (narinfo-sha256 narinfo)) ;<-- here!
(signature (narinfo-signature narinfo))
(uri (uri->string (narinfo-uri narinfo))))
(and hash signature
(signature-case (signature hash acl)
…)))))

Narinfos produced by ‘guix publish’ look like this:

Toggle snippet (10 lines)
StorePath: /gnu/store/nrkm1683p1cqnkcmhlmhiig9q9qd7xqh-sed-4.5
URL: nar/gzip/nrkm1683p1cqnkcmhlmhiig9q9qd7xqh-sed-4.5
Compression: gzip
NarHash: sha256:17ymma68kh0l5hrsc6w1ma0ixb52lbwwm43wdhl0mm1q19j69s9n
NarSize: 704040
References: 4sqps8d…
FileSize: 240878
Signature: 1;berlin.guixsd.org;KHNp…

So ‘guix substitutes’ expects the signature to be computed over
everything. However, a server could well send this:

Toggle snippet (10 lines)
Signature: 1;EVIL.example.org;ABCd…
StorePath: /gnu/store/nrkm1683p1cqnkcmhlmhiig9q9qd7xqh-sed-4.5
URL: nar/gzip/nrkm1683p1cqnkcmhlmhiig9q9qd7xqh-sed-4.5
Compression: gzip
NarHash: sha256:17ymma68kh0l5hrsc6w1ma0ixb52lbwwm43wdhl0mm1q19j69s9n
NarSize: 704040
References: 4sqps8d…
FileSize: 240878

… in which case the signature is expected to be computed over the empty
string (thus it’s the same for all the narinfos it serves.)

The problem is that ‘guix substitute’ will accept such narinfos (when
they are signed by an authorized key), even though the signature doesn’t
cover the important parts (namely: StorePath, NarHash, and References;
the rest is mostly informative.) A fix is attached with tests that
illustrate the problem.


I think the main consequence is repudiation: if you receive a narinfo
where the signature comes first, that doesn’t prove anything; the server
operator could pretend it never sent it since in essence its contents
are unsigned. It’s not clear to me whether/how this could be exploited.

Also keep in mind that this is limited to servers with a key present in
the user’s /etc/guix/acl (“trusted” servers.) In this context, servers
are in a position to do more harm to the user anyway since they serve
substitutes.

TIA,
Ludo’.

PS: Thanks to Leo and Ricardo for their quick feedback on the
guix-security mailing list!
From eb6f7aa5e57185acbe100eb21abb300f0cfb264b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ludovic=20Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 19:45:47 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] DRAFT substitute: Ignore irrelevant narinfo signatures.

Fixes XXX.

Fixes a bug whereby 'guix substitute' would accept narinfos whose
signature did not cover the StorePath/NarHash/References tuple.

* guix/scripts/substitute.scm (narinfo-sha256)[%mandatory-fields]: New
variable.
Compute SIGNED-FIELDS; return #f unless each of the %MANDATORY-FIELDS
is among SIGNED-FIELDS.
* tests/substitute.scm ("query narinfo with signature over nothing")
("query narinfo with signature over irrelevant bits"): New tests.
---
guix/scripts/substitute.scm | 13 ++++++++++--
tests/substitute.scm | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Toggle diff (89 lines)
diff --git a/guix/scripts/substitute.scm b/guix/scripts/substitute.scm
index d6dc9b6448..53b1777241 100755
--- a/guix/scripts/substitute.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/substitute.scm
@@ -392,12 +392,21 @@ No authentication and authorization checks are performed here!"
(define (narinfo-sha256 narinfo)
"Return the sha256 hash of NARINFO as a bytevector, or #f if NARINFO lacks a
'Signature' field."
+ (define %mandatory-fields
+ ;; List of fields that must be signed. If they are not signed, the
+ ;; narinfo is considered unsigned.
+ '("StorePath" "NarHash" "References"))
+
(let ((contents (narinfo-contents narinfo)))
(match (string-contains contents "Signature:")
(#f #f)
(index
- (let ((above-signature (string-take contents index)))
- (sha256 (string->utf8 above-signature)))))))
+ (let* ((above-signature (string-take contents index))
+ (signed-fields (match (call-with-input-string above-signature
+ fields->alist)
+ (((fields . values) ...) fields))))
+ (and (every (cut member <> signed-fields) %mandatory-fields)
+ (sha256 (string->utf8 above-signature))))))))
(define* (valid-narinfo? narinfo #:optional (acl (current-acl))
#:key verbose?)
diff --git a/tests/substitute.scm b/tests/substitute.scm
index 964a57f30b..f4f2e9512d 100644
--- a/tests/substitute.scm
+++ b/tests/substitute.scm
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
;;; Copyright © 2014 Nikita Karetnikov <nikita@karetnikov.org>
-;;; Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2017 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2017, 2018 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -211,6 +211,46 @@ a file for NARINFO."
(lambda ()
(guix-substitute "--query"))))))))
+(test-equal "query narinfo with signature over nothing"
+ ;; The signature is computed over the empty string, not over the important
+ ;; parts, so the narinfo must be ignored.
+ ""
+
+ (with-narinfo (string-append "Signature: " (signature-field "") "\n"
+ %narinfo "\n")
+ (string-trim-both
+ (with-output-to-string
+ (lambda ()
+ (with-input-from-string (string-append "have " (%store-prefix)
+ "/aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-foo")
+ (lambda ()
+ (guix-substitute "--query"))))))))
+
+(test-equal "query narinfo with signature over irrelevant bits"
+ ;; The signature is valid but it does not cover the
+ ;; StorePath/NarHash/References tuple and is thus irrelevant; the narinfo
+ ;; must be ignored.
+ ""
+
+ (let ((prefix (string-append "StorePath: " (%store-prefix)
+ "/aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-foo
+URL: example.nar
+Compression: none\n")))
+ (with-narinfo (string-append prefix
+ "Signature: " (signature-field prefix) "
+NarHash: sha256:aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
+NarSize: 42
+References: bar baz
+Deriver: " (%store-prefix) "/foo.drv
+System: mips64el-linux\n")
+ (string-trim-both
+ (with-output-to-string
+ (lambda ()
+ (with-input-from-string (string-append "have " (%store-prefix)
+ "/aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-foo")
+ (lambda ()
+ (guix-substitute "--query")))))))))
+
(test-equal "query narinfo signed with authorized key"
(string-append (%store-prefix) "/aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa-foo")
--
2.19.2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ZcH/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 13 Dec 2018 23:54
control message for bug #33733
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87pnu582bx.fsf@gnu.org
tags 33733 security
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 13 Dec 2018 23:54
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87o99p82bn.fsf@gnu.org
severity 33733 important
L
L
Ludovic Courtès wrote on 14 Dec 2018 00:39
Re: bug#33733: Irrelevant narinfo signatures are honored
(address . 33733-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87a7l9808k.fsf@gnu.org
Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:

Toggle quote (6 lines)
> The problem is that ‘guix substitute’ will accept such narinfos (when
> they are signed by an authorized key), even though the signature doesn’t
> cover the important parts (namely: StorePath, NarHash, and References;
> the rest is mostly informative.) A fix is attached with tests that
> illustrate the problem.

I pushed the fix as 60b04024f8823192b74c1ed5b14f318049865ac7 and an
update of the ‘guix’ package as
7ef64ec8476e9f13262d7755aff27c97dd2cd683.

I encourage you to upgrade your daemon.

Ludo’.
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 33733@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 33733
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch