sorcer fails to build

  • Done
  • quality assurance status badge
Details
3 participants
  • Maxim Cournoyer
  • Ricardo Wurmus
  • Thorsten Wilms
Owner
unassigned
Submitted by
Thorsten Wilms
Severity
normal

Debbugs page

Thorsten Wilms wrote 6 years ago
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
c5fce381-0729-3813-dab8-d038d9c528e7@freenet.de
phase `unpack' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
starting phase `build-faust-sources'
ERROR : can't open architecture file lv2synth.cpp
phase `build-faust-sources' failed after 0.0 seconds
## WARNING: phase `build-faust-sources' returned `#f'. Return values
other than #t
## are deprecated. Please migrate this package so that its phase
## procedures report errors by raising an exception, and otherwise
## always return #t.
builder for
`/gnu/store/kkv8im08v7x5ijd8w4jgmgvcp42a2i8l-sorcer-1.1.3.drv' failed
with exit code 1
build of /gnu/store/kkv8im08v7x5ijd8w4jgmgvcp42a2i8l-sorcer-1.1.3.drv failed
View build log at
'/var/log/guix/drvs/kk/v8im08v7x5ijd8w4jgmgvcp42a2i8l-sorcer-1.1.3.drv.bz2'.
guix build: error: build failed: build of
`/gnu/store/kkv8im08v7x5ijd8w4jgmgvcp42a2i8l-sorcer-1.1.3.drv' failed

---

I found this thread, but that's about the warning, not the actual cause
of failure, AFAICS:

Thanks for handling the previous issues so quickly!
Ricardo Wurmus wrote 6 years ago
(address . t_w_@freenet.de)(address . 33683@debbugs.gnu.org)
874lbnez3v.fsf@elephly.net
Hi Thorsten,

Toggle quote (4 lines)
> phase `unpack' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `build-faust-sources'
> ERROR : can't open architecture file lv2synth.cpp

This is an upstream problem that i’ve reported upstream:


We cannot build the sources with either of the Faust releases, so
there’s little we can do on our end.

The sorcer Faust code looks *very* simple, though, so it may not be too
difficult to write the DSP code in Faust 2 and submit it upstream.

--
Ricardo
Thorsten Wilms wrote 6 years ago
(name . Ricardo Wurmus)(address . rekado@elephly.net)(address . 33683@debbugs.gnu.org)
c03a36c6-337c-a882-4669-c707baee4158@freenet.de
On 09/12/2018 12.08, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:

Toggle quote (10 lines)
> This is an upstream problem that i’ve reported upstream:
>
> https://github.com/openAVproductions/openAV-Sorcer/issues/22
>
> We cannot build the sources with either of the Faust releases, so
> there’s little we can do on our end.
>
> The sorcer Faust code looks *very* simple, though, so it may not be too
> difficult to write the DSP code in Faust 2 and submit it upstream.

OK, thanks. Good that you brought it upstream, but a bit unfortunate
that there wasn't an issue in debbugs.

Is there a policy regarding known unbuildable packages? Perhaps there
could be a mechanism that would spare users from attempting to have the
un-buildable build, which may involve stopping a `guix package -u` or a
`guix package -m manifest-file` in its tracks ...


--
Thorsten Wilms
Maxim Cournoyer wrote 2 years ago
(name . Thorsten Wilms)(address . t_w_@freenet.de)(address . 33683-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
87ttsicxcz.fsf@gmail.com
Hello,

Thorsten Wilms <t_w_@freenet.de> writes:

Toggle quote (18 lines)
> phase `unpack' succeeded after 0.0 seconds
> starting phase `build-faust-sources'
> ERROR : can't open architecture file lv2synth.cpp
> phase `build-faust-sources' failed after 0.0 seconds
> ## WARNING: phase `build-faust-sources' returned `#f'. Return values
> other than #t
> ## are deprecated. Please migrate this package so that its phase
> ## procedures report errors by raising an exception, and otherwise
> ## always return #t.
> builder for
> `/gnu/store/kkv8im08v7x5ijd8w4jgmgvcp42a2i8l-sorcer-1.1.3.drv' failed
> with exit code 1
> build of /gnu/store/kkv8im08v7x5ijd8w4jgmgvcp42a2i8l-sorcer-1.1.3.drv failed
> View build log at
> '/var/log/guix/drvs/kk/v8im08v7x5ijd8w4jgmgvcp42a2i8l-sorcer-1.1.3.drv.bz2'.
> guix build: error: build failed: build of
> `/gnu/store/kkv8im08v7x5ijd8w4jgmgvcp42a2i8l-sorcer-1.1.3.drv' failed

As on Guix 1dce887, sorcer is available from both bordeaux or berlin, so
it appears to build fine.

Closing.

--
Thanks,
Maxim
Closed
?
Your comment

This issue is archived.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 33683@debbugs.gnu.org

To respond to this issue using the mumi CLI, first switch to it
mumi current 33683
Then, you may apply the latest patchset in this issue (with sign off)
mumi am -- -s
Or, compose a reply to this issue
mumi compose
Or, send patches to this issue
mumi send-email *.patch
You may also tag this issue. See list of standard tags. For example, to set the confirmed and easy tags
mumi command -t +confirmed -t +easy
Or, remove the moreinfo tag and set the help tag
mumi command -t -moreinfo -t +help