pelican-quickstart produces files with store path shebangs

OpenSubmitted by ng0.
Details
3 participants
  • Mark H Weaver
  • ng0
  • zimoun
Owner
unassigned
Severity
normal
N
(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)
20170622123528.7xhnrkj5ksjznp3g@abyayala
In a pelican directory after running pelican-quickstart:
egrep -nr "store"pelicanconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/bf54hnwd8mb63zmssc23fwslf5zvxpxs-python-wrapper-3.5.3/bin/pythondevelop_server.sh:1:#!/gnu/store/k7029k5va68lkapbzcycdzj7m5bjb4b8-bash-4.4.12/bin/bashpublishconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/bf54hnwd8mb63zmssc23fwslf5zvxpxs-python-wrapper-3.5.3/bin/python

We have a couple more bugs like this. If they are already grouped,add this bug to them.-- ng0OpenPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588https://krosos.org/~/ng0/https://www.infotropique.org
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 18 Dec 2020 21:10
(name . ng0)(address . ng0@infotropique.org)(address . 27447@debbugs.gnu.org)
868s9uvprq.fsf@gmail.com
Hi
On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 at 12:35, ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org> wrote:
Toggle quote (11 lines)> In a pelican directory after running pelican-quickstart:>> egrep -nr "store"> …> pelicanconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/bf54hnwd8mb63zmssc23fwslf5zvxpxs-python-wrapper-3.5.3/bin/python> develop_server.sh:1:#!/gnu/store/k7029k5va68lkapbzcycdzj7m5bjb4b8-bash-4.4.12/bin/bash> publishconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/bf54hnwd8mb63zmssc23fwslf5zvxpxs-python-wrapper-3.5.3/bin/python>> We have a couple more bugs like this. If they are already grouped,> add this bug to them.
What are these oyther “couple more bugs like this”?
http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/27447
All the best,simon
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 18 Dec 2020 21:10
control message for bug #27447
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
867dpevprn.fsf@gmail.com
tags 27447 + moreinfoquit
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 11 Jan 13:59 +0100
Re: bug#27447: pelican-quickstart produces files with store path shebangs
(name . ng0)(address . ng0@infotropique.org)(address . 27447-done@debbugs.gnu.org)
86a6tftyrm.fsf@gmail.com
Hi,
On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 21:10, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:
Toggle quote (17 lines)> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 at 12:35, ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org> wrote:
>> In a pelican directory after running pelican-quickstart:>>>> egrep -nr "store">> …>> pelicanconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/bf54hnwd8mb63zmssc23fwslf5zvxpxs-python-wrapper-3.5.3/bin/python>> develop_server.sh:1:#!/gnu/store/k7029k5va68lkapbzcycdzj7m5bjb4b8-bash-4.4.12/bin/bash>> publishconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/bf54hnwd8mb63zmssc23fwslf5zvxpxs-python-wrapper-3.5.3/bin/python>>>> We have a couple more bugs like this. If they are already grouped,>> add this bug to them.>> What are these other “couple more bugs like this”?>> <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/27447>
No moreinfo so I am closing. If I am missing something, then pleasereopen it.

All the best,simon
Closed
M
M
Mark H Weaver wrote on 14 Jan 00:37 +0100
(address . 27447@debbugs.gnu.org)
87im804dds.fsf@netris.org
reopen 27447thanks
Hi Simon,
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
Toggle quote (21 lines)> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 21:10, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 at 12:35, ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org> wrote:>>>> In a pelican directory after running pelican-quickstart:>>>>>> egrep -nr "store">>> …>>> pelicanconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/bf54hnwd8mb63zmssc23fwslf5zvxpxs-python-wrapper-3.5.3/bin/python>>> develop_server.sh:1:#!/gnu/store/k7029k5va68lkapbzcycdzj7m5bjb4b8-bash-4.4.12/bin/bash>>> publishconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/bf54hnwd8mb63zmssc23fwslf5zvxpxs-python-wrapper-3.5.3/bin/python>>>>>> We have a couple more bugs like this. If they are already grouped,>>> add this bug to them.>>>> What are these other “couple more bugs like this”?>>>> <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/27447>>> No moreinfo so I am closing. If I am missing something, then please> reopen it.
The lack of response about the "couple more bugs like this" does notinvalidate the bug reported in this bug report. I think it was merely asuggestion that this bug might possibly be merged with other similarbugs. The key point is that we don't need an answer to that question toinvestigate/fix this bug.
Unless we have reason to believe that 'pelican-quickstart' is no longerembedding store paths in the generated files, I think we should keepthis bug open. Does that make sense?
Regards, Mark
Z
Z
zimoun wrote on 14 Jan 10:37 +0100
(name . Mark H Weaver)(address . mhw@netris.org)
86h7njsvtn.fsf@gmail.com
Hi Mark,
First, one key point is the dates…
Toggle quote (3 lines)>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 21:10, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 at 12:35, ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org> wrote:
…so more than 3 years without any comment. By without any comment, Imean literally no comment; my email was the first. I can tell you thatmost of the old and forgotten bug reports like this one are simplyemails addressed to incorrect list (bug-guix instead of guix-devel); asa rule of thumb. I am trying hard to avoid some false positive by firstunderstand and second carefully check, so if I do not understand nor beable to check then I let the report as it is. Well, I am sorry if I havefailed to one or the other.
Second, it does not appear to me a bug. The “quickstart” generateslocal configuration files that contain absolute path to the Pythoninterpreter.
Toggle snippet (37 lines)$ guix environment -C --ad-hoc pelican coreutils grep[env]$ mkdir foo && cd foo && ls -ltotal 0
[env]$ pelican-quickstartWelcome to pelican-quickstart v4.2.0.
This script will help you create a new Pelican-based website.
Please answer the following questions so this script can generate the filesneeded by Pelican.
> Where do you want to create your new web site? [.] > What will be the title of this web site? Foo> Who will be the author of this web site? zimoun> What will be the default language of this web site? [en] > Do you want to specify a URL prefix? e.g., https://example.com (Y/n) n> Do you want to enable article pagination? (Y/n) n> What is your time zone? [Europe/Paris] > Do you want to generate a tasks.py/Makefile to automate generation and publishing? (Y/n) y> Do you want to upload your website using FTP? (y/N) N> Do you want to upload your website using SSH? (y/N) N> Do you want to upload your website using Dropbox? (y/N) N> Do you want to upload your website using S3? (y/N) N> Do you want to upload your website using Rackspace Cloud Files? (y/N) N> Do you want to upload your website using GitHub Pages? (y/N) NDone. Your new project is available at /tmp/bar
[env]$ lsMakefile content output pelicanconf.py publishconf.py tasks.py
[env]$ egrep -nr "store"pelicanconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/h8jw9qhyfp6fm6nb3cgh4335qhr31wfz-python-wrapper-3.8.2/bin/pythonpublishconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/h8jw9qhyfp6fm6nb3cgh4335qhr31wfz-python-wrapper-3.8.2/bin/python
Why is it a bug?
Since the test suite is #f, I have not checked if the package is reallyfunctional. But the last updates are in 2019-12-29 and a revamp in2019-01-15 so I assumed the package is functional and this reference inconfig files is not an issue.
Toggle quote (10 lines)>>>> We have a couple more bugs like this. If they are already grouped,>>>> add this bug to them.>>>>>> What are these other “couple more bugs like this”?>>>>>> <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/27447>>>>> No moreinfo so I am closing. If I am missing something, then please>> reopen it.
Third, no moreinfo about the bug itself, which I consider myself asnotabug. And no moreinfo about other cases to examine them case percase. So I closed after waiting couple of weeks.
BTW, the submitter of the report clearly stated they is not working onGuix anymore [1], therefore, they will no provide moreinfo.
1: http://logs.guix.gnu.org/guix/2020-12-01.log#230743

Toggle quote (6 lines)> The lack of response about the "couple more bugs like this" does not> invalidate the bug reported in this bug report. I think it was merely a> suggestion that this bug might possibly be merged with other similar> bugs. The key point is that we don't need an answer to that question to> investigate/fix this bug.
Sorry if it has not appeared as this but I have investigated this bugand from my understanding, it is not a bug. Since no one commented, Ihave moved forward. Again sorry if I have missed something.

Toggle quote (4 lines)> Unless we have reason to believe that 'pelican-quickstart' is no longer> embedding store paths in the generated files, I think we should keep> this bug open. Does that make sense?
Why does embed store paths in configuration files is an issue? Pelicanis a Python application which therefore requires a Python interpreter.Running ’pelican’ against another Python VM than the one it was builtseems a bad idea.
And if the point is run “pelican-quickstart” with one Pelican versionbuilt against one Python VM, and then reuse these generated config fileswith another Pelican version built against another Python VM, in thisuse-case, the bug is upstream because it embeds absolute path which doesnot respect PEP 394 [2]. I agree that in this case, the bug should/muststill be opened until upstream fix.
Well, I am probably missing the story about shebang and Guix.
2: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0394/

All the best,simon
M
M
Mark H Weaver wrote on 15 Jan 00:00 +0100
(name . zimoun)(address . zimon.toutoune@gmail.com)
87a6tb3yz0.fsf@netris.org
Hi Simon,
zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> writes:
Toggle quote (7 lines)> First, one key point is the dates…>>>> On Fri, 18 Dec 2020 at 21:10, zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> wrote:>>>> On Thu, 22 Jun 2017 at 12:35, ng0 <ng0@infotropique.org> wrote:>> …so more than 3 years without any comment.
That a bug has been neglected for years does not imply that it's nolonger a bug, or that we should forget about it.
Toggle quote (44 lines)> Second, it does not appear to me a bug. The “quickstart” generates> local configuration files that contain absolute path to the Python> interpreter.>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---> $ guix environment -C --ad-hoc pelican coreutils grep> [env]$ mkdir foo && cd foo && ls -l> total 0>> [env]$ pelican-quickstart> Welcome to pelican-quickstart v4.2.0.>> This script will help you create a new Pelican-based website.>> Please answer the following questions so this script can generate the files> needed by Pelican.>> >> Where do you want to create your new web site? [.] >> What will be the title of this web site? Foo>> Who will be the author of this web site? zimoun>> What will be the default language of this web site? [en] >> Do you want to specify a URL prefix? e.g., https://example.com (Y/n) n>> Do you want to enable article pagination? (Y/n) n>> What is your time zone? [Europe/Paris] >> Do you want to generate a tasks.py/Makefile to automate generation and publishing? (Y/n) y>> Do you want to upload your website using FTP? (y/N) N>> Do you want to upload your website using SSH? (y/N) N>> Do you want to upload your website using Dropbox? (y/N) N>> Do you want to upload your website using S3? (y/N) N>> Do you want to upload your website using Rackspace Cloud Files? (y/N) N>> Do you want to upload your website using GitHub Pages? (y/N) N> Done. Your new project is available at /tmp/bar>> [env]$ ls> Makefile content output pelicanconf.py publishconf.py tasks.py>> [env]$ egrep -nr "store"> pelicanconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/h8jw9qhyfp6fm6nb3cgh4335qhr31wfz-python-wrapper-3.8.2/bin/python> publishconf.py:1:#!/gnu/store/h8jw9qhyfp6fm6nb3cgh4335qhr31wfz-python-wrapper-3.8.2/bin/python> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--->> Why is it a bug?
It's a bug because these absolute file names will cease to exist afterthe next 'core-updates' merge happens, and more precisely after theolder system generations (or user profiles) are deleted and 'guix gc'subsequently deletes these obsolete store items.
At that point, maybe things will break. I think that would need to beinvestigated before dismissing this bug report.
Toggle quote (6 lines)>>> No moreinfo so I am closing. If I am missing something, then please>>> reopen it.>> Third, no moreinfo about the bug itself, which I consider myself as> notabug.
In many cases, the lack of "moreinfo" prevents us from furtherinvestigating a bug, and in such cases I agree that it is justifiable toclose a bug report. For example, users often report a bug that we areunable to reproduce, and then they stop communicating.
However, this case is quite different. In this case, we already enoughinformation to reproduce and investigate this bug. The "moreinfo" thatyou requested was regarding a side comment that ng0 made about thepossibility of other similar bugs that might be merged with this one.The fact that ng0 never answered that side question doesn't imply thatthe bug he reported is no longer relevant.
I think that there's good reason to believe that this bug is stillrelevant. It certainly has not yet been established here that this bugdoes not exist or is harmless. Therefore, we should not forget aboutit, even if ng0 has moved on.
Does that make sense?
Nonetheless, I very much appreciate your ongoing work on these old bugreports. It is a great help.
Regards, Mark
M
M
Mark H Weaver wrote on 16 Jan 09:17 +0100
(no subject)
(address . control@debbugs.gnu.org)
87lfcti9cb.fsf@netris.org
tags 27447 - moreinfothanks
?