systemd service files installed by guix 0.13.0 cannot used by other distributions

Open

Details

2 participants

???
Leo Famulari

Owner: unassigned

Submitted by: ???

Severity: normal

??? wrote on 23 May 2017 17:33

Recipients:(address . bug-guix@gnu.org)

Message-ID:CAG-RorUA4NG3wdJcStHTCMASJXtk-gWo-aM6+GHfi=V2=o1wyA@mail.gmail.com

I want to update my unofficial guix packages for Arch and Fedora to
0.13.0, but I found the systemd service files installed by guix 0.13.0
use /var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix* instead of
/usr/bin/guix* in ExecStart=. The path /var/guix/profiles don't exist
on systems that don't have guix installed before, and users will have
to manually start guix-daemon and install guix with guix before they
can use the systemd service files. Is it possible to fix systemd
service files, so it can be easily used by packages in other
distributions?

Leo Famulari wrote on 23 May 2017 18:16

Recipients:(name . ???)(address . lantw44@gmail.com)(address . 27037@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:20170523161624.GA15379@jasmine

On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:33:42PM +0800, ??? wrote:

Hi!

Toggle quote (5 lines)

> I found the systemd service files installed by guix 0.13.0

> use /var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix* instead of

> /usr/bin/guix* in ExecStart=. The path /var/guix/profiles don't exist

> on systems that don't have guix installed before

I'm a little confused: is there a situation where Guix is not installed

but '/usr/bin/guix-daemon' exists?

The path '/var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix-daemon'

is guaranteed to exist if you followed the instructions in Binary

Installation [0], which is, as far as I know, the most common way to

install Guix on other distros. So, I think this path is appropriate for

the basic service file we provide.

Toggle quote (3 lines)

> Is it possible to fix systemd service files, so it can be easily used

> by packages in other distributions?

I think that, if you are packaging Guix for other distros, you should
provide your own service file. My experience is that each systemd-based
distro uses systemd's advanced features (e.g. process grouping and
resource limiting) in different ways. So, making your own service file,
in accordance with your distro's standards, will help Guix work in a way
that is more idiomatic to the host distro.

[0] Specifically, it happens during the initial unpacking and renaming:
`mv var/guix /var/ && mv gnu/`
https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Binary-Installation.html

??? wrote on 24 May 2017 17:37

Recipients:(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)(address . 27037@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:8c249c24-b33b-3f41-112c-59e04d96803b@gmail.com

Leo Famulari ? ??2017?05?24? 00:16 ??:

Toggle quote (12 lines)> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:33:42PM +0800, ??? wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
>> I found the systemd service files installed by guix 0.13.0
>> use /var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix* instead of
>> /usr/bin/guix* in ExecStart=. The path /var/guix/profiles don't exist
>> on systems that don't have guix installed before
> 
> I'm a little confused: is there a situation where Guix is not installed
> but '/usr/bin/guix-daemon' exists?

This can happen with source installation. 'make install' installs

/usr/bin/guix* but not /var/guix. /var/guix doesn't exist until

guix-daemon is started.

Toggle quote (7 lines)

> The path '/var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix-daemon'

> is guaranteed to exist if you followed the instructions in Binary

> Installation [0], which is, as far as I know, the most common way to

> install Guix on other distros. So, I think this path is appropriate for

> the basic service file we provide.

I think you mean that the systemd service files included in Guix are

only intended to be used with binary installation process. Do you mean

that using them with traditional 'make install' installation is not

supported?

Toggle quote (11 lines)> 
>> Is it possible to fix systemd service files, so it can be easily used
>> by packages in other distributions?
> 
> I think that, if you are packaging Guix for other distros, you should
> provide your own service file. My experience is that each systemd-based
> distro uses systemd's advanced features (e.g. process grouping and
> resource limiting) in different ways. So, making your own service file,
> in accordance with your distro's standards, will help Guix work in a way
> that is more idiomatic to the host distro.

Yes, I am packaging Guix for Arch and Fedora, and I use the systemd

service files provided by Guix in my packages since version 0.8.3. If

doing so is never supported, I can make my own service files like what I

did for version 0.6 to 0.8.2 and I think this bug can be closed.

Toggle quote (5 lines)> 
> [0] Specifically, it happens during the initial unpacking and renaming:
> `mv var/guix /var/ && mv gnu/`
> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Binary-Installation.html
>

Leo Famulari wrote on 25 May 2017 00:07

Recipients:(name . ???)(address . lantw44@gmail.com)(address . 27037@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:20170524220753.GA27348@jasmine

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:37:27PM +0800, ??? wrote:

Toggle quote (8 lines)

> Leo Famulari ? ??2017?05?24? 00:16 ??:

> > I'm a little confused: is there a situation where Guix is not installed

> > but '/usr/bin/guix-daemon' exists?

> This can happen with source installation. 'make install' installs

> /usr/bin/guix* but not /var/guix. /var/guix doesn't exist until guix-daemon

> is started.

I see. We discussed this use case previously, which led to the change

which caused your issue:

https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25852#80

In short, we decided to break this for `make install` since we didn't

come up with a better solution at the time.

Toggle quote (10 lines)> > The path '/var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix-daemon'
> > is guaranteed to exist if you followed the instructions in Binary
> > Installation [0], which is, as far as I know, the most common way to
> > install Guix on other distros. So, I think this path is appropriate for
> > the basic service file we provide.
> 
> I think you mean that the systemd service files included in Guix are only
> intended to be used with binary installation process. Do you mean that using
> them with traditional 'make install' installation is not supported?

It's de facto unsupported, since it's not working :) But, I think we

should address this use case, since it is causing problems for

downstream packagers.

Toggle quote (5 lines)

> Yes, I am packaging Guix for Arch and Fedora, and I use the systemd service

> files provided by Guix in my packages since version 0.8.3. If doing so is

> never supported, I can make my own service files like what I did for version

> 0.6 to 0.8.2 and I think this bug can be closed.

I do think you should look into tailoring a service file to those

systems; you might be able to provide Guix on those systems in a more

integrated or idiomatic way.

However, we also try to offer upstream service files in the packages

offered by Guix, so I'd like to find a way to support both the binary

installation and `make install` use cases simultaneously.

Unless somebody proposes a fix in the meantime, I'll look into this more

closely before the next release.

??? wrote on 29 May 2017 16:19

Recipients:(name . Leo Famulari)(address . leo@famulari.name)(address . 27037@debbugs.gnu.org)

Message-ID:eebf6dd4-e00f-1386-269e-6410a0cc336d@gmail.com

Leo Famulari ? ??2017?05?25? 06:07 ??:

Toggle quote (40 lines)> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 11:37:27PM +0800, ??? wrote:
>> Leo Famulari ? ??2017?05?24? 00:16 ??:
>>> I'm a little confused: is there a situation where Guix is not installed
>>> but '/usr/bin/guix-daemon' exists?
>>
>> This can happen with source installation. 'make install' installs
>> /usr/bin/guix* but not /var/guix. /var/guix doesn't exist until guix-daemon
>> is started.
> 
> I see. We discussed this use case previously, which led to the change
> which caused your issue:
> 
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25852#80
> 
> In short, we decided to break this for `make install` since we didn't
> come up with a better solution at the time.
> 
>>> The path '/var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix-daemon'
>>> is guaranteed to exist if you followed the instructions in Binary
>>> Installation [0], which is, as far as I know, the most common way to
>>> install Guix on other distros. So, I think this path is appropriate for
>>> the basic service file we provide.
>>
>> I think you mean that the systemd service files included in Guix are only
>> intended to be used with binary installation process. Do you mean that using
>> them with traditional 'make install' installation is not supported?
> 
> It's de facto unsupported, since it's not working :) But, I think we
> should address this use case, since it is causing problems for
> downstream packagers.
> 
>> Yes, I am packaging Guix for Arch and Fedora, and I use the systemd service
>> files provided by Guix in my packages since version 0.8.3. If doing so is
>> never supported, I can make my own service files like what I did for version
>> 0.6 to 0.8.2 and I think this bug can be closed.
> 
> I do think you should look into tailoring a service file to those
> systems; you might be able to provide Guix on those systems in a more
> integrated or idiomatic way.

I updated my packages to install two systemd service files for

guix-daemon to allow users to choose between /usr/bin/guix-daemon and

/var/guix/profiles/per-user/root/guix-profile/bin/guix-daemon.

Toggle quote (9 lines)

> However, we also try to offer upstream service files in the packages

> offered by Guix, so I'd like to find a way to support both the binary

> installation and `make install` use cases simultaneously.

> Unless somebody proposes a fix in the meantime, I'll look into this more

> closely before the next release.

Is it possible to resolve it by providing a configure option to choose 
between two versions of systemd service files, so guix binary tarballs 
can use /var/guix/profiles but packages of other distributions can use 
/usr/bin?

Your comment

Commenting via the web interface is currently disabled.

To comment on this conversation send an email to 27037@debbugs.gnu.org

is:open	open issues
is:done	closed issues
submitter:<who>	search issue submitter
author:<who>	search by message author
date:yesterday..now	search by issue date
mdate:3m..2d	search by message date