Am Samstag, dem 08.04.2023 um 15:42 -0400 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > Hi, > > Liliana Marie Prikler writes: > > > * gnu/packages/gnome.scm (libsoup-minimal-2): Update to 2.74.3. > > --- > >  gnu/packages/gnome.scm | 4 ++-- > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm > > index 90e33d72b6..4f47e60505 100644 > > --- a/gnu/packages/gnome.scm > > +++ b/gnu/packages/gnome.scm > > @@ -5263,7 +5263,7 @@ (define-public libsoup-minimal > >  ;;; An older variant kept to build the 'rest' package. > >  (define-public libsoup-minimal-2 > >    (package/inherit libsoup-minimal > > -    (version "2.72.0") > > +    (version "2.74.3") > >      (source (origin > >                (method url-fetch) > >                (uri (string-append > > "mirror://gnome/sources/libsoup/" > > @@ -5271,7 +5271,7 @@ (define-public libsoup-minimal-2 > >                                    "libsoup-" version ".tar.xz")) > >                (sha256 > >                 (base32 > > -                > > "11skbyw2pw32178q3h8pi7xqa41b2x4k6q4k9f75zxmh8s23y30p")))) > > +                > > "04rgv6hkyhgi7lak9865yxgbgky6gc635p7w6nhcbj64rx0prdz4")))) > >      (arguments > >       (substitute-keyword-arguments (package-arguments libsoup- > > minimal) > >         ((#:phases phases) > > LGTM.  Hopefully we can get rid of the libsoup-2 stuff after we've > updated all of GNOME to 43 (which had a hard requirement to not rely > on libsoup@2). Well, the goal is to move to 44 directly, but aren't there non-GNOME packages out there running libsoup-2 just like there's stuff still running GTK 2?