Hi Ludo, On ven., 10 mars 2023 at 09:17, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hmm good point. So maybe we need to wrap after all, and also keep > propagated inputs (as an example, (guix build download) uses the > Disarchive modules directly, not the command.) I am proposing to have ’package/inherit’, 1. ’disarchive’: the standalone CLI with wrap 2. ’guile-disarchive’: the library with propagated-inputs WDYT? Cheers, simon