Hi, Cool you had the number 62000. ;-) On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 12:48, Bruno Victal wrote: > Suspected file: .dir-locals.el > > Using 'package' as a field in define-configuration results in > inconsistent indentation: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (define-configuration/no-serialization mympd-configuration > (package > (file-like mympd) ;;;; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< notice how it's indented with 2 spaces > "The package object of the myMPD server." > empty-serializer) > > (shepherd-requirement > (list-of-symbol '()) ;;;; <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< vs 1 space > "This is a list of symbols naming Shepherd services that this service > will depend on." > empty-serializer) > > ;; ... > ) > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- What do you mean by inconsistent? Do you think that ’sheperd-requirement’ should be management by .dir-locals.el? Well, .dirl-locals.el does not consider the context, IIUC. For instance, (let ((package something)) (package () ) ) Because of .dir-locals.el, the rules looks like that: (not-in-dir-locals.el () ) (package () ) (package/inherit () () ) (add-before () () () ) (let-keywords () () () () ) Or you can see that differently, (not-in-dir-locals.el () () ) (package () () ) (package/inherit () () ) (add-before () () () ) Well, since ’sheperd-requirement’ is not in .dir-locals.el, the indentation seems expected. What do you consider as a bug? Cheer, simon