From debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Tue Mar 07 00:31:53 2023 Received: (at 61570) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Mar 2023 05:31:53 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44281 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZPvU-00052G-UB for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2023 00:31:53 -0500 Received: from mail-ed1-f68.google.com ([209.85.208.68]:44868) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pZPvT-000524-41 for 61570@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 07 Mar 2023 00:31:51 -0500 Received: by mail-ed1-f68.google.com with SMTP id ay14so44092642edb.11 for <61570@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 21:31:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1678167105; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aFSwizBEEMaPhQOY5D35YFx2qaiKPo9AShP3Dgoyllo=; b=aobQtsfzYU5yf4FBHFBXya7sJRG+YnRrZUzED8M1aqgZirI/6Xsow76QJqwhS5x3zb 4opuOE+x524q/BztbNmnJwZj44FjELsWiWp7N/WUp50qQETs+0qvF/wcUtU4E7X6hZKv GnoVjZU9SYRPIFG83IfoxJYCUq2enge/UZggPRHCB/E7vpbGwZDUTdI/g7QDf97HAGeL DXTebCW/ysmp/qJpNjqUeOmeloDAVQFoZc1DsZ4apNm/oy2Zxyqg2UYL7viTzq3eQc/2 ApfiNBjUrn63Iwc0T8HGv1NHnLFtnJQv9MgKauVa4efBGIUaeVF76i3sBXf3bLYJc1w2 hHqw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678167105; h=mime-version:user-agent:content-transfer-encoding:references :in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=aFSwizBEEMaPhQOY5D35YFx2qaiKPo9AShP3Dgoyllo=; b=RqxTE6peiwSyjRuNJmQNfWD55+SQIhnEgLXoBz0EAGcNneC1bDNBkycWeioIq6zrXb KsBJiu+1Fbs7moPkERSgUn7Hyv901/z5qiodKGPKPQNQj5KVapCbudnYsK9/1rx8j8p9 o9mmZGN3MjUTFCcojnZTe5/BpYUYn7RRHvTP0isJFHjJAgQltF60GyDoQPLGTRNY/4Qb yk4wrrzK7nQYsvYBzuo9VnIxBCGDaGIlaOKZgUPa/fvkBzOFhEYOnrAIMsOYX5kl/yvZ xIST6nEzpw5YQjcgNfcOO8bT7kOHTlxSU+pst+Forxj7J/9uqj8a/dV2Rz4EeL9amKJ/ KKzg== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKV/So3qHCP7gX3SuSt6OAmfukhpIqTx0oIxxDMMrrMXIDdO0bA1 BOjjNKVWWD6ProXz2BvN1+8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set9wOWVi/llo3vNbm56/rdKxiepxxFKfFM3VQW3Lit96427utJjRbSR+UI9KvGGHJJ8EmKJsOg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2028:b0:4af:70a5:55ee with SMTP id ay8-20020a056402202800b004af70a555eemr11277728edb.3.1678167104858; Mon, 06 Mar 2023 21:31:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from lumine.fritz.box (85-127-52-93.dsl.dynamic.surfer.at. [85.127.52.93]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z19-20020a50cd13000000b004bd1fe2cc02sm5985146edi.16.2023.03.06.21.31.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 06 Mar 2023 21:31:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Subject: Re: Backward incompatible changes in mpd-service-type From: Liliana Marie Prikler To: Maxim Cournoyer Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 06:31:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87bkl5z7lt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87y1owsbab.fsf@gmail.com> <8c7394ba-b8fa-eac5-7d3e-3d8160b71894@makinata.eu> <959a4528abf2fec979e3816ff8d175f65d13d1ab.camel@gmail.com> <87bkl5z7lt.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.46.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Debbugs-Envelope-To: 61570 Cc: Bruno Victal , 61570@debbugs.gnu.org X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Sender: "Debbugs-submit" X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) Am Montag, dem 06.03.2023 um 20:13 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > > Am Freitag, dem 17.02.2023 um 07:53 -0500 schrieb Maxim Cournoyer: > > > Else an error rather than a warning when multiple same-name users > > > are defined would be more appropriate, I think. > > Guess what, it used to be a formatted message (i.e. an actual > > error). However, that broke some configs as reported in [1], so I > > demoted it to a warning. >=20 > Interesting.=C2=A0 I didn't know we were usefully (?) abusing duplicate > users and group. As far as I'm aware, we aren't. Even if such uses exist, they raise said warning and probably cause more issues down the line, like with your bug report. > Perhaps we should try to isolate the most common offenders > (services?), fix them up, and then re-introduce the check, perhaps > gradually (e.g. "in 6 months time, duplicated users or groups will > become a configuration error"). The only instance known to me (cups creating a duplicate lp group) was fixed back in 2021. Cheers